LaDonna's 99 FBI files are uploaded RE Apollo

"OM" om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote in message
...
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:43:13 -0700, "And Justice For All"
wrote:

You are very welcome I am just trying to help with the Internet/Usenet aspect of this.

...Which is why you've posted this *twice*, once using your
shame-wrought name, the other using this hypocritical alias.

PLONK

"privacy.net" my ass...

OM

Hi,

www.privacy.net is actually a very cool website and a valid return email is produced.
I have used it on the sci.* groups before.

My apoligies for that. I don't normally post using my real name on any newsgroup.

I make an exception for this science group though. I do not plan on posting here reguraly
so I had changed back to the anonymous information on my OE account. I caught it,
cancelled it and immeditely corrected it within seconds.

It was not intentional and surely reasonable people will understand how that mistake could
happen. Unreasonable people might make a huge issue of it but I won't be responding.

I do apreciate you filtering me though. Now if I could just get you to stop posting my
name daily this group would be a much better place. This is the end of my comms with
you Bob there will not be any back and forth on this issue it was a mistake, they happen.
There shouldn't be any reason for you to rehash this the focus of this post is the link below.

http://www.beadjewelers.com/ladonna.htm

P. Maxson

"P. Maxson" wrote in message ...
"OM" om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote in message
...
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:43:13 -0700, "And Justice For All"
wrote:

You are very welcome I am just trying to help with the Internet/Usenet aspect of this.

...Which is why you've posted this *twice*, once using your
shame-wrought name, the other using this hypocritical alias.

PLONK

"privacy.net" my ass...

OM

Hi,

www.privacy.net is actually a very cool website and a valid return email is produced.
I have used it on the sci.* groups before.

My apoligies for that. I don't normally post using my real name on any newsgroup.

I make an exception for this science group though. I do not plan on posting here reguraly
so I had changed back to the anonymous information on my OE account. I caught it,
cancelled it and immeditely corrected it within seconds.

It was not intentional and surely reasonable people will understand how that mistake could
happen. Unreasonable people might make a huge issue of it but I won't be responding.

I do apreciate you filtering me though. Now if I could just get you to stop posting my
name daily this group would be a much better place. This is the end of my comms with
you Bob there will not be any back and forth on this issue it was a mistake, they happen.
There shouldn't be any reason for you to rehash this the focus of this post is the link below.

http://www.beadjewelers.com/ladonna.htm

P. Maxson

By the way, I notice this thread has not been posted to in two days.
I thought you folks were so hot on "verifiable references?" Well?
Here are 100 documents, one of which is almost 50 pages long, and I
don't see throngs of excited "fact-finders" checking them out. Could
it be you folks are simply full of hot air? Nahhhhh, couldn't be.
You must just be terribly busy. Yeah, that's it. I'm sure you'll get
to it...eventually. Hee hee.
LaDonna

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
m...
I thought you folks were so hot on "verifiable references?"

We're checking things out in order, and stopping when we've reached
something you haven't provided verifiable references for. At the moment,
that would be your "teammates" and the law enforcement officers you spoke to
about Apollo 1. If you can't provide verifiable answers to those items,
there's no reason to believe anything else you claim.

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
You are NOT "checking things out in
order," etc.

At the moment, I'm stopped, because I've reached a question for which you
haven't provided anything verifiable.

Please post *verifiable* information about your "teammates" and the law
enforcement officials you contacted about Apollo 1 so I can move on to your
next unsubstantiated claim.

Just answer the questions with verifiable information that actually supports
your claims, and they'll go away.

GUARANTEED you haven't spent five seconds looking at those documents

Quite a bit more than five seconds, in fact. They don't say what you claim.
I'll discuss them with you *after* I've been able to verify your claim about
contacting law enforcement about Apollo 1.

"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message ...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
You are NOT "checking things out in
order," etc.

At the moment, I'm stopped, because I've reached a question for which you
haven't provided anything verifiable.

Please post *verifiable* information about your "teammates" and the law
enforcement officials you contacted about Apollo 1 so I can move on to your
next unsubstantiated claim.

Just answer the questions with verifiable information that actually supports
your claims, and they'll go away.

GUARANTEED you haven't spent five seconds looking at those documents

Quite a bit more than five seconds, in fact. They don't say what you claim.
I'll discuss them with you *after* I've been able to verify your claim about
contacting law enforcement about Apollo 1.

Put up, or shut up. What did those documents say? Let's forget the
FBI papers for a moment: At what time did Main B zero out for the
first time the day of the fire? What part of the Plugs-Out Test was
the crew conducting when communications first went south that
afternoon? What is the electrical tie between the two?
Of course you cannot answer. You're too busy coming up with lies,
distortions, and red herrings.
LaDonna

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message
...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
You are NOT "checking things out in
order," etc.

At the moment, I'm stopped, because I've reached a question for which
you
haven't provided anything verifiable.

Please post *verifiable* information about your "teammates" and the law
enforcement officials you contacted about Apollo 1 so I can move on to
your
next unsubstantiated claim.

Just answer the questions with verifiable information that actually
supports
your claims, and they'll go away.

GUARANTEED you haven't spent five seconds looking at those documents

Quite a bit more than five seconds, in fact. They don't say what you
claim.
I'll discuss them with you *after* I've been able to verify your claim
about
contacting law enforcement about Apollo 1.

Put up, or shut up. What did those documents say?

They didn't have any *verifiable* references to the law enforcement
personnel you claim you spoke to, *or* verifiable information about your
teammates.

After those questions are answered, I'll be able to discuss your documents
with you.

"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message ...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message
...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
You are NOT "checking things out in
order," etc.

At the moment, I'm stopped, because I've reached a question for which
you
haven't provided anything verifiable.

Please post *verifiable* information about your "teammates" and the law
enforcement officials you contacted about Apollo 1 so I can move on to
your
next unsubstantiated claim.

Just answer the questions with verifiable information that actually
supports
your claims, and they'll go away.

GUARANTEED you haven't spent five seconds looking at those documents

Quite a bit more than five seconds, in fact. They don't say what you
claim.
I'll discuss them with you *after* I've been able to verify your claim
about
contacting law enforcement about Apollo 1.

Put up, or shut up. What did those documents say?

They didn't have any *verifiable* references to the law enforcement
personnel you claim you spoke to, *or* verifiable information about your
teammates.

After those questions are answered, I'll be able to discuss your documents
with you.

Translation: You haven't looked at any of it. BIG surprise.
LaDonna

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message
...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message
...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
You are NOT "checking things out in
order," etc.

At the moment, I'm stopped, because I've reached a question for
which
you
haven't provided anything verifiable.

Please post *verifiable* information about your "teammates" and the
law
enforcement officials you contacted about Apollo 1 so I can move on
to
your
next unsubstantiated claim.

Just answer the questions with verifiable information that actually
supports
your claims, and they'll go away.

GUARANTEED you haven't spent five seconds looking at those
documents

Quite a bit more than five seconds, in fact. They don't say what you
claim.
I'll discuss them with you *after* I've been able to verify your
claim
about
contacting law enforcement about Apollo 1.

Put up, or shut up. What did those documents say?

They didn't have any *verifiable* references to the law enforcement
personnel you claim you spoke to, *or* verifiable information about your
teammates.

After those questions are answered, I'll be able to discuss your
documents
with you.

Translation:

You haven't answered any of it. Big surprise. You really don't get it: if
you won't provide the information to allow such a small claim to be
verified, it shows that you are a liar on everything else. Your own actions
keep you from being taken seriously. Verifying your claim on this would
boost your credibility everywhere else.

The only reason for not providing the information is that it doesn't exist.
Answer it or admit you lied and the question will go away.

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...

Put up, or shut up. What did those documents say? Let's forget the
FBI papers for a moment: At what time did Main B zero out for the
first time the day of the fire? What part of the Plugs-Out Test was
the crew conducting when communications first went south that
afternoon? What is the electrical tie between the two?
Of course you cannot answer. You're too busy coming up with lies,
distortions, and red herrings.

Who are you trying to convince? Nobody on this NG is stupid enough to fall
for your "right back at ya" tactic.

Again: do you have the slightest concern for your credibility? **** like
this doesn't help you *at all*

--
Terrell Miller


"Married men live longer than single men, but married men are a lot more
willing to die."
Proverb

"Terrell Miller" wrote in message .. .
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...

Put up, or shut up. What did those documents say? Let's forget the
FBI papers for a moment: At what time did Main B zero out for the
first time the day of the fire? What part of the Plugs-Out Test was
the crew conducting when communications first went south that
afternoon? What is the electrical tie between the two?
Of course you cannot answer. You're too busy coming up with lies,
distortions, and red herrings.

Who are you trying to convince? Nobody on this NG is stupid enough to fall
for your "right back at ya" tactic.

Again: do you have the slightest concern for your credibility? **** like
this doesn't help you *at all*

Hedrick is not WORTH a "real" answer. He's proven himself to have the
mental and emotional age of about three, and I am insulting
three-year-olds by saying so.
LaDonna