Last Call!

HangEveryRepubliKKKan wrote:
Ahahahaha.. Science is an unstoppable force in the world, and the fact
that Bawana and his KKKonservative Brethren characterize Science as
LIBERAL, just illustrates the insanity of the KKKonservative right.


"½ wit" wrote
BBBBBbbbzzzzzzzzzzzzzzttttt... *WRONG* wrong, all it takes is a few lies,
"Politically Correct limitations" and fudged numbers then SCIENCE is at a
dead stop.

We have just had all of that with the South Korean scientist who claimed
to have made various cloning breakthrought, when in fact his research was
fake. We see this from time to time in science. But since science is self
correcting these petty deceits are found if they do not mesh with reality
and corrected.

"Politically correct limitations" generally don't work. A good example is
the KKKonservative aboliton of government funding for research on embryo
sourced stem cell lines. What this has done is stagnate AmeriKKKan research,
and move the "forbidden" research to other nations that are not as
Christian correct.

This is not to say that there are not or should not be moral and ethical
bounds to scientific research. There are, and should be, and they will
correctly become more pervasive as the ability to manipulate nature in big
ways, improves.

Biotechnology is a particular concern, since bioengineered organisms have
the potential to eradicate large subsets of the biosphere. All primates,
all fish, all mollusks, all ferns, or perhaps all living things.

To a lesser extent nanotechnology and experiments in high energy physics
provide a similar, but as yet vastly smaller risk.


The fact that KKKonservatism is based on anti-science also explains the
KKKonservative's
complete and utter failure to be able to do anything but destroy and kill.
You can't build
anything that works on a foundation of lies. That's why KKKonservatives
break anything they touch.

The KKKonservative movement is dead. It's death was inevitable as it is
at it's core - anti-science - and hence based on non-science nonsense.

HangEveryRepubliKKKan wrote:
HangEveryRepubliKKKan wrote:
Ahahahaha.. Science is an unstoppable force in the world, and the fact
that Bawana and his KKKonservative Brethren characterize Science as
LIBERAL, just illustrates the insanity of the KKKonservative right.


"½ wit" wrote
BBBBBbbbzzzzzzzzzzzzzzttttt... *WRONG* wrong, all it takes is a few lies,
"Politically Correct limitations" and fudged numbers then SCIENCE is at a
dead stop.

We have just had all of that with the South Korean scientist who claimed
to have made various cloning breakthrought, when in fact his research was
fake. We see this from time to time in science. But since science is self
correcting these petty deceits are found if they do not mesh with reality
and corrected.



So says you, what of the ones that aren't discovered right away?

"Politically correct limitations" generally don't work. A good example is
the KKKonservative aboliton of government funding for research on embryo
sourced stem cell lines. What this has done is stagnate AmeriKKKan research,
and move the "forbidden" research to other nations that are not as
Christian correct.


There you go, like the Democrats crush any implications of a connection
between race and intelligence, while that create ones between CO2 and
temperature.

This is not to say that there are not or should not be moral and ethical
bounds to scientific research. There are, and should be, and they will
correctly become more pervasive as the ability to manipulate nature in big
ways, improves.


Kill people to get an answer?
Define people...


Biotechnology is a particular concern, since bioengineered organisms have
the potential to eradicate large subsets of the biosphere. All primates,
all fish, all mollusks, all ferns, or perhaps all living things.

One life is as sacred as a million lives.

To a lesser extent nanotechnology and experiments in high energy physics
provide a similar, but as yet vastly smaller risk.


The fact that KKKonservatism is based on anti-science also explains the
KKKonservative's
complete and utter failure to be able to do anything but destroy and kill.

You ignore the Liberals grasping at what they want the answer to be and
ignoring the science.

You can't build
anything that works on a foundation of lies. That's why KKKonservatives
break anything they touch.


Liberals lie to themselves, what can be worse than that.

The KKKonservative movement is dead. It's death was inevitable as it is
at it's core - anti-science - and hence based on non-science nonsense.

Your still with Alice in Wonderland, catch the rabbit.

"Window Licking" wrote
970,000 to go.... at this rate it might take longer than than their OIL
will last.

Sadly yes, 970,000 more AmeriKKKans may have to be killed before
AmeriKKKan KKKonservatives get the message.

So be it.



British polling agency: More than one million Iraqi deaths since US invasion
By Patrick Martin
15 September 2007
Use this version to print | Send this link by email | Email the author

As part of its campaign to justify a long-term US occupation of Iraq, the
Bush administration has increasingly resorted to warning of chaos and even
genocide in the wake of a withdrawal of American troops. But a new report
suggests that something akin to genocide is already taking place, under
American auspices.

The British polling agency ORB reported Thursday that the death toll in Iraq
since the 2003 US invasion has passed the one million mark.

According to ORB, US-occupied Iraq, with an estimated 1.2 million violent
deaths, has "a murder rate that now exceeds the Rwanda genocide from 1994
(800,000 murdered)," with another one million wounded and millions more
driven from their homes into internal or external exile.

ORB (Opinion Research Business), which has conducted polls in Iraq since
2005, released the findings of a survey of 1,461 adults across the country.
Among other questions, it asked: "How many members of your household, if
any, have died as a result of the conflict in Iraq since 2003 (i.e., as a
result of violence rather than a natural death such as old age)? Please note
that I mean those who were actually living under your roof."

Of those responding, 78 percent said their households had experienced no
violent deaths, 16 percent had experienced one death, 5 percent two deaths,
1 percent three deaths or more. Given the number of households in the
country, 4,050,597 according to 2005 census figures, this works out to
nearly 1.2 million deaths.

By far the worst death rate was in Baghdad, where nearly half of all those
interviewed reported at least one violent death in their household. The
reported death rate in Diyala province (Baquba) was 42 percent, and in
Ninewa province (Mosul), 35 percent.

The survey found that 48 percent of the violent deaths were due to gunshot
wounds, 20 percent to car bombs, 9 percent to aerial bombardment, 6 percent
to other ordnance or explosions, and 6 percent to accidents.

The figure for aerial bombardments is particularly noteworthy since such
deaths-numbering well over 100,000 according to the ORB study-go virtually
unreported in the American media. This is doubtless because such killings
are entirely the work of the US and British occupation forces, the only ones
equipped with helicopters and warplanes.

The ORB survey found a far higher death rate than the figures released by
Western media outlets, the US-established Iraqi government in Baghdad, or
the United Nations. But it dovetails with the public health survey conducted
last year by a team of scientists from Johns Hopkins University and
published in the British medical journal Lancet, which estimated the death
toll (as of early 2006, nearly 18 months ago), at about 665,000.

The Lancet figures were denounced by the US and Iraqi governments and
dismissed by the American media, and the ORB figures are likely to face the
same fate. The study's findings were reported only in passing in Friday's
daily newspapers, most prominently by the Los Angeles Times and Boston
Globe, not at all by the New York Times or Washington Post.

None of the network evening news broadcasts on Friday even mentioned the ORB
report.

Opinion Research Business is not a left-wing or antiwar group, but an
established polling organization, founded in 1994 by Gordon Heald, who
headed Gallup Britain from 1980 to 1994. Its customers include the huge
mining concern Anglo American, the Bank of Scotland, and the Conservative
Party. Its non-executive director is Geoffrey Martin OBE, currently special
adviser to the secretary general on strategic relationships of the British
Commonwealth.

The ORB survey was based on face-to-face interviews conducted between August
12 and August 19 among a nationally representative sample of 1,720 adults
(of whom 1,461 responded), with a standard margin of error of 2.4 percent.
Random sampling was used to select those interviewed in 15 of Iraq's 18
provinces.

For security reasons, no interviews were conducted in Al Anbar or Karbala
provinces, or in the province of Irbil, where Kurdish authorities refused to
allow field interviews. Since Anbar and Karbala are among the bloodiest
battlefields of the war, and Irbil among the quietest, the exclusion of the
three provinces would more likely to lead to an underestimation of the death
toll than an exaggeration.

The ORB study was made public on the same day that President Bush went on
national television to deliver a report on conditions in Iraq that was
nothing short of delusional. With a million Iraqis dead, a million wounded,
and four to five million displaced, Bush hailed the return of "normal life"
to the devastated country. "Sectarian killings are down, and ordinary life
is beginning to return," he said.

The next day Bush and Vice President Cheney appeared before hand-picked
audiences to press their campaign for an unlimited US occupation of Iraq.
Bush spoke at the Marine base at Quantico, Virginia and Cheney at the Gerald
Ford Museum in Michigan and the headquarters of the Central Command in
Florida.

Cheney claimed that the result of a rapid US troop withdrawal would be
"chaos" and "carnage," declaring, "In all the calls we've heard for an
American withdrawal from Iraq, these negative consequences haven't really
been denied, they've simply been ignored."

Cheney raised the specter of Iranian intervention in a post-US Iraq, which
"would unloose an all-out war, with the violence unlikely to be contained
within Iraq. The ensuing carnage would further destabilize the Middle East
and magnify the threat to our friends throughout the region."

Bush, speaking before an audience of 250 Marines and their families in
Quantico, claimed, "We got security in the right direction and we are
bringing our troops home."

Also Friday, the State Department quietly released a report noting that
religious freedom has sharply deteriorated in Iraq over the past year
because of the upsurge in sectarian killings, with minority religions
(Sunnis in Shiite areas, Shiites in Sunni areas, secular Iraqis, Christians
and smaller groups in all areas) subjected to systematic persecution.

The report cited "frequent sectarian violence including attacks on places of
worship," as well as "harassment, intimidation, kidnapping, and killings,"
adding that "non-Muslims (are) especially vulnerable to pressure and
violence, because of their minority status and, often, because of the lack
of a protective tribal structure."

The Democratic Party is fully complicit in the creation of conditions of
near-genocide in Iraq, since the congressional Democratic leadership has
refused to cut off funding for a war which has cost the lives of more than
one million Iraqis, as well as over 3,700 American soldiers.

In response to Bush's Thursday night speech, there were renewed professions
of impotence by leading Senate Democrats. Barack Obama, who began his
campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination touting his antiwar
credentials, said the Democratic-controlled Congress could not force Bush to
accept a deadline for ending the war.

"One way of ending the war would be setting a timetable," he said in a
speech in Iowa. "We're about 15 votes short. Right now it doesn't look like
we're going to get that many votes."

Obama was referring to the 67 votes required in the Senate to override a
presidential veto. He was silent on the fact that there are other
constitutional methods of ending the war, such as refusing to appropriate
the funds to finance it, which the Democratic congressional leadership has
rejected.

Senator Kent Conrad of North Dakota, chair of the Senate Budget Committee,
told Congressional Quarterly, "The truth is we don't have the votes to end
the war." He said Senate Democrats would seek to "move the things that we
can move on domestic issues" in order to "have tangible accomplishments,"
rather than persist in debates on Iraq.

Other senators endorsed this view, including Charles Schumer of New York,
who said, referring to the upcoming 2008 campaign, "This election is shaping
up to be about change. Not only change in Iraq, but change at home." Senator
Ken Salazar of Colorado said, "The Democratic message has to focus on things
that are good for the middle class. The war should not be the only issue."

In the House of Representatives, Speaker Nancy Pelosi has not scheduled any
vote on Iraq war policy this month, although the defense authorization bill
still remains to be adopted for the fiscal year beginning October 1. All
indications are that the congressional Democrats will rubber-stamp both the
authorization and the emergency funding bill for the war, expected to
approach $200 billion, which has not yet been sent to Congress by the Bush
administration.

The silence from the Democratic and Republican parties and the media on the
latest evidence of mass killing and social devastation in Iraq as a result
of the US colonial war and occupation underscores the complicity of the
entire American ruling elite and all of its official institutions in a war
crime of catastrophic proportions.

"HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote
A fine example of Mental Illness. It is far to common in the AmeriKKKan
KKKonservative community these days.

They have been driven mad by their own continual failure.


"Bill Habr" wrote
Can you say projection?

Yup, and I can see that you are a failure as well.

On Oct 26, 10:41 am, kT wrote:
Bawana wrote:
On Oct 26, 7:12 am, kT wrote:
Bawana wrote:
On Oct 26, 2:24 am, kT wrote:
Bawana wrote:
On Oct 25, 9:52 pm, "Rick" wrote:
"kT" wrote in message
...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7060072.stm
Final drinks, Arthur, hurry!
And eat these peanuts.
You need to go out, get drink, have a friendly conversation with people,
meet a girl, smoke a joint, or do something . Your attitude is self
defeating.
All these lib-turd-cult-****s are death worshipers.
It's amazing they can get out of bed and go to work.
Classic Bwanaman. I wonder if you even got the joke.
You're not funny and you don't go to work.
No, but I know how to measure it. I'm in quality control.

...and unemployed. No field work for mental cases? Too bad.

So what are you gonna do after the end of the world?
Help with the spiritual garbage pile fire...dispose of you lib-tard
malignant spirits...
Ah, ... the Bawana 'death cult'.

Always willing to help.

It's called hypocrisy.

No, tard, it's called work that needs to be done.

"½ wit" wrote
We have just had all of that with the South Korean scientist who
claimed to have made various cloning breakthrought, when in fact his
research was fake. We see this from time to time in science. But since
science is self correcting these petty deceits are found if they do not
mesh with reality and corrected.


"½ wit" wrote
So says you, what of the ones that aren't discovered right away?

Then they are eventually identified when theory is found to not correspond
with measurement, or when current experiment doesn't produce results that
confirm previous experiments.


"Politically correct limitations" generally don't work. A good example
is the KKKonservative aboliton of government funding for research on
embryo sourced stem cell lines. What this has done is stagnate AmeriKKKan
research, and move the "forbidden" research to other nations that are not
as Christian correct.

"½ wit" wrote
There you go, like the Democrats crush any implications of a connection
between race and intelligence, while that create ones between CO2 and
temperature.

Everyone knows us black men have huge dicks, and that's why you small
white men try to keep your white women away from us. Instinctively you know
that they wan't a internal cock massage that you aren't equipped to provide
them.

This is not to say that there are not or should not be moral and ethical
bounds to scientific research. There are, and should be, and they will
correctly become more pervasive as the ability to manipulate nature in big
ways, improves.

Biotechnology is a particular concern, since bioengineered organisms
have the potential to eradicate large subsets of the biosphere. All
primates, all fish, all mollusks, all ferns, or perhaps all living
things.

"½ wit" wrote
One life is as sacred as a million lives.

Which one? Which million?


To a lesser extent nanotechnology and experiments in high energy
physics provide a similar, but as yet vastly smaller risk.


The fact that KKKonservatism is based on anti-science also explains the
KKKonservative's
complete and utter failure to be able to do anything but destroy and
kill.

"½ wit" wrote
You ignore the Liberals grasping at what they want the answer to be and
ignoring the science.

Most groups suffer from that kind of problem. But with RepubliKKKans -
particularly anti-evooution - Christian KKKonservaties, the denial of
reality is all pervasive.


You can't build
anything that works on a foundation of lies. That's why KKKonservatives
break anything they touch.

"½ wit" wrote
Liberals lie to themselves, what can be worse than that.

Liar they Political Party is RepubliKKKan. George Bush is the poster
child for the movement.


The KKKonservative movement is dead. It's death was inevitable as it
is
at it's core - anti-science - and hence based on non-science nonsense.

"½ wit" wrote
Your still with Alice in Wonderland, catch the rabbit.

meanwhile the U.S. dollar reached another all time low against the Euro.

ahahahahahahaha.... Everything in AmeriKKKa is going just fine...
Ahahhahhaa

"Barking Up" wrote
how can you be so delusional? You whiners are so scared and panicking
about 3000 soldiers killed,

I'm more concerned about the 1 milllion Iraqi's murdered on the orders of
the Bush Criminal.