A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nasa ******s



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old July 11th 03, 02:41 PM
BenignVanilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nasa ******s

"Frog" wrote in message
...
snip
I'm afraid you dont understand how it works. And you dont seem
to understand the seriousness of your accusation.


Just curious...if I were to refer to people that use remailers to SPAM
newsgroups, as jackasses, would you sue me for comparing you to a beast of
burden?

Monday actualy and its already begun, In a phone call from my
people regarding my faxes to them they explained that it can be
done and surprisingly its not that difficult to do aparantly.

My people get colleagues in your ISP's duristiction to file
a charge of defamtaion and or slander/libel as the last two
come under the first youll probably only be charged with
the former. The court then issues an order to your ISP
for your details. Then you will be served with the charges.


What he said was not slander...He never never stated anything as fact, so I
don't see how it is slanderous. You my friend are a horrible troll. Not very
skilled.

It is up to you to then contact your lawyers/representatives
or do whatever you want. Wether you apear in court to answer
the charge against you is up to you, you could find yourself
in contempt if you dont. I would imagine under the circumstances
and as you will have no evidence to back up your claim that I am
a pedophile your lawyer will probably tell you to apear and
apologise and admit you got it wrong. Then costs against you
will be requested.

Unfortunately I have been advised that this could take
many months, it will not take weeks to resolve.

I have also been advised not to converse with you any further
on this matter as it could be construed that I have led you
on to make further allegations. The phone call letter or kock
at the door will be comming but it may be a while yet.


WHAT!?!?!? You are going to send a kock to his door? That sounds like sexual
harrasment. Please keep your kock to yourself, it does not belong in this
NG.

You
know how lawyers like to drag things out
and as youll be ultimately paying for mine and yours and
my costs and any compensation..well what can I say.

I will know more on Monday but as I say I cannot discuss
this any further with you. All I can now do is sit back and
wait and report any further allegations you make. I also
have to report to my people copies of any further posts you make
regarding this allegation. Including your post above.


Your crack team of lawyers expects you to report on what happens here? They
are not data collecting for the case? Sounds like they are pretty sucky
lawyers to me.

BV.


  #22  
Old July 11th 03, 03:16 PM
Frog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nasa ******s


"BenignVanilla" writes:

"Frog" wrote in message
...
snip
I'm afraid you dont understand how it works. And you dont seem
to understand the seriousness of your accusation.


Just curious...if I were to refer to people that use remailers to SPAM
newsgroups, as jackasses, would you sue me for comparing you to a beast of
burden?


Being accused of one of the most hideous and despicable of
crimes is not a funny matter. I suspect most people here
if accused of such a hidious crime would follow the same
action I am.


Monday actualy and its already begun, In a phone call from my
people regarding my faxes to them they explained that it can be
done and surprisingly its not that difficult to do aparantly.

My people get colleagues in your ISP's duristiction to file
a charge of defamtaion and or slander/libel as the last two
come under the first youll probably only be charged with
the former. The court then issues an order to your ISP
for your details. Then you will be served with the charges.


What he said was not slander...He never never stated anything as fact, so I
don't see how it is slanderous. You my friend are a horrible troll. Not very
skilled.


I'll go with what my people tell me thanks, I doubt I will
ever need legal assistance from you....It may not be slander
but it was sure defamation and I have had that confirmed thank you
by those who know and not some usenet troll such as yourself.
Slander comes under the defamation laws so there may be
two instead of one charge, that will be determined but there
is no doubt from my people that at least one charge will be brought
in due course.


It is up to you to then contact your lawyers/representatives
or do whatever you want. Wether you apear in court to answer
the charge against you is up to you, you could find yourself
in contempt if you dont. I would imagine under the circumstances
and as you will have no evidence to back up your claim that I am
a pedophile your lawyer will probably tell you to apear and
apologise and admit you got it wrong. Then costs against you
will be requested.

Unfortunately I have been advised that this could take
many months, it will not take weeks to resolve.

I have also been advised not to converse with you any further
on this matter as it could be construed that I have led you
on to make further allegations. The phone call letter or kock
at the door will be comming but it may be a while yet.


WHAT!?!?!? You are going to send a kock to his door? That sounds like sexual
harrasment. Please keep your kock to yourself, it does not belong in this
NG.


Troll.....


You
know how lawyers like to drag things out
and as youll be ultimately paying for mine and yours and
my costs and any compensation..well what can I say.

I will know more on Monday but as I say I cannot discuss
this any further with you. All I can now do is sit back and
wait and report any further allegations you make. I also
have to report to my people copies of any further posts you make
regarding this allegation. Including your post above.


Your crack team of lawyers expects you to report on what happens here? They
are not data collecting for the case? Sounds like they are pretty sucky
lawyers to me.


Of course I have been instructed to report any instance of the
accuser repeating or commenting on their allegation, thats just
common sense.....you really need to give reality a chance lad.
If he/she repeats the allegation of course I will report it
and send full faxed copy of the repeated allegation including
full header information, I would be a fool not to as it can
only help my case.


BV.



  #23  
Old July 11th 03, 04:42 PM
Frog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nasa ******s


"BenignVanilla" writes:

"Frog" wrote in message
...
snip
Being accused of one of the most hideous and despicable of
crimes is not a funny matter. I suspect most people here
if accused of such a hidious crime would follow the same
action I am.

snip

For the record...I think frogs are slimey little creatures.


For the record I think kids should be banned from usenet....

You done yourself no favours over the last couple of days
lad, no ones gonna take anything you say from now on
seriously.


BV.



  #24  
Old July 11th 03, 06:51 PM
Frog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nasa ******s


"BenignVanilla" writes:

"Frog" wrote in message
...

"BenignVanilla" writes:

"Frog" wrote in message
...
snip
Being accused of one of the most hideous and despicable of
crimes is not a funny matter. I suspect most people here
if accused of such a hidious crime would follow the same
action I am.
snip

For the record...I think frogs are slimey little creatures.


For the record I think kids should be banned from usenet....

You done yourself no favours over the last couple of days
lad, no ones gonna take anything you say from now on
seriously.


How disappointing. I hope you for one put me in your killfile.


LOL, I have no intentions of killfilling anyone lad, least of
all you, other wise I would not be in a postion to point out
your erronous posts to others, admittedly I may choose to
ignore most of your posts but rest assured I'm watching
and waiting to jump...


BV.



  #25  
Old July 11th 03, 07:21 PM
BenignVanilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nasa ******s

"Frog" wrote in message
...
snip
LOL, I have no intentions of killfilling anyone lad, least of
all you, other wise I would not be in a postion to point out
your erronous posts to others, admittedly I may choose to
ignore most of your posts but rest assured I'm watching
and waiting to jump...

snip

That sounds great. I have no problem with someone maturely pointing out any
errors that I may make. That will only serve to enhance the quality of the
group.

BV.


  #26  
Old July 12th 03, 01:55 PM
Frog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nasa ******s


Mac writes:


Fine.
You have made your threat.


It is not a threat.

Now, take action.


I told you yesterday its already underway...

And, no, it does not need to take "months"


I have been advised it may well take months, lawyers
and courts are not the fasted things on earth you know.

All you have to do is let the Newsgroup know when your attorney
or your solicitor or your lawyer has everything drawn up.


I dont let the newsgroup know anything, you show a complete
lack of understanding of this process, I explained yesterday
what is going to happen as was told to me over the phone
by my people after reading my faxes....I wil know more
on Monday I expect...

Give the name of your legal representative.


I dont give you that information, Your people can contact
my people if they want once you have recived the charge/s
against you. There is no reason for your people to contact
mine or vice versa, it doesnt work like that.


Give the address and telephone of your legal representative.


See above....

Either I or my representative will contact this person and help
expedite delivery.


Again you are showing a completet lack of how this works

That is NOT DISCUSSING THIS FURTHER.


Oh really, in your post you have reposted your
allegation again, you reposted it, now I
have to forward that to my people as it looks
as though you have indeed repeated the allegation...

I sugest you seek proper legal advice BEFOR you comment
on this any further because at the moment your digging
a bigger hole for yourself.

That is simply helping expedite the matter.


The matter is and will be dealt with, I'm in no hurry.

However, please do show the person exactly what was written.


Are you reading what I have said befor because it doesnt
seem that you are....

And have them carefully read it while you continue hiding behind
your Annonymous Remailer while making your comments.
You have made your threat: now, please take action.


Again it is not a threat, and action has begun, I dont
know how manny times I am going to have to say that
until it sinks in with you.

YOU need legal advice, they will no doubt tell you
whatever you do dont repeat the allegation or comment
on it for a third time!!.

Prompt action.


Maybe not Prompt, but it is action.....

---Mac



  #27  
Old July 15th 03, 06:13 AM
Mac
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nasa ******s

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 23:06:40 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
wrote:

On 10 Jul 2003 16:54:39 +0200, Frog wrote:


Mac writes:

On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 17:29:45 GMT, Anonymous
] wrote:
Yeah I bet that stuck in your NASA throat eh Baalke!!....That

us Brits could do something NASA cant.....

When you gonna scrap that waste of money the ISS Baalke
eh you know your just there spinning a story, how about
telling the US of A tax payer what their money is being wasted
on!!!!

************* ********
Poor little troll.
Just as Daniel Joseph Min, he must use the Annonymous ReMailer's
so favored by pedophiles and others who fear the light of day and
must seek the shadows to cast their aspersions in the desperate
hopes of enhancing their own image...

---Mac
******************* **************
LITTLE FROGGY...
Are you saying I am a pedophile???. Copy of post taken
lawyers in the wings waiting........

I'll give you twenty four hours to retract that accusation
or get yourself a good lawyer.

****************************
W. Anglesea:
He hasn't called you a pedophile, but he's shown you up as an idiot.

************* ***********
Well, thank you.
It wasn't too difficult to show that person as an idiot; as a
blustering, supercilious lad... Most of that effort was done
by himself.
Did you note his problems with distinguishing "your" and "you are
=you're"... and in a post spelling "hassle" as "hastle" ??
That probably indicates his grade level while on school break.

I find it amazing that you, and at least the other ten or twelve
people sending me a message, were able to read what was stated
and yet this one critter, and his "attorney", or his "solicitor",
or, whatever, apparently are not able to do so....

It was interesting that most of those writing were also getting a
chuckle out of LITTLE FROGGY's hiding beyind his Annonymous
ReMailer, threatening an attorney, and refusing to divulge the
name of the attorney to help expedite his "actions".
Oh, well.
By the way, Mr. Anglesea, keep posting. I do enjoy working
through the information you provide
---Mac
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moon and Mars expeditions vs. RLV development vthokie Policy 62 March 30th 04 04:51 AM
Pres. Kerry's NASA ed kyle Policy 354 March 11th 04 07:05 PM
NASA's year of sorrow, recovery, progress and success Jacques van Oene Space Shuttle 0 December 31st 03 07:28 PM
NASA Selects Explorer Mission Proposals For Feasibility Studies Ron Baalke Science 0 November 4th 03 10:14 PM
NASA Celebrates Educational Benefits of Earth Science Week Ron Baalke Science 0 October 10th 03 04:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.