|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
explaining the plane-of-ecliptic and Saturn Rings purely from Coulombforce law; #154; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory
So far I have given evidence to disprove the Nebular Dust Cloud theory
NDC, by evidence such as the Moon recession in Dirac's new-radioactivities and evidence such as the cores of planets and the AP-Titius-Bode spacing of planets and satellites. So far I have thus given evidence that disproves the NDC theory, but I have not talked about the strong point of the NDC theory, namely its plane of ecliptic where nearly all the planets, except for Pluto tilted at 17 degrees are in that plane. And that the Rings of Saturn form a planetary ecliptic of small particles. So if the Atom Totality theory with the Dirac new radioactivities to form Solar Systems is true, that an explanation of plane of ecliptic needs to be provided. I see the "plane of ecliptic" as the strongest feature in favor of the NDC theory. So I should endeavor to show that the Atom Totality theory explains the plane of ecliptic and rings of Saturn better than what the Nebular Dust Cloud theory can explain. The NDC explanation is involving angular momentum of the original Nebular Dust Cloud and that this cloud would have an original inherent spin angular momentum where the planetesimals would precipitate out in that plane. Mind you, I do not need to go through this exercise of showing that a Coulomb force as the center of a planet like Saturn as Positron-Space-gravity attracts the ordinary matter and keeps those particles orbiting in a Ring. I need not have to go through that argument since other data disprove the NDC theory. But I feel I should go through this exercise to show that the strong feature of NDC theory is itself flawed. Now I have been putting this exercise off for some long time now for the reason that I have not been able to find a good electromagnetic analogy to easily prove that a Coulomb force of attraction delivers a plane of ecliptic and Saturn Rings. The obvious first analogy is a sheet of paper with iron fillings and all those filings end up resembling Saturn's Rings. But that is 2dimensional and confined by the sheet of paper or in a more elaborate demonstration a sheet in motion. What I really need for a demonstration is a 3 dimensional with small iron spheres all moving in different directions and with a central magnet that causes those balls to orbit. And that given an amount of time t2, those balls will end up orbiting in a plane of ecliptic. The reason for this initial random orbiting becoming all in one plane is because of the Coulomb force by a central magnet is most powerful at its equatorial plane of spin. Now in Dirac new radioactivities, our Solar System was probably not borne in all random orbits of its planets but was already confined to a orderly initial birth, so unlike my demonstration above of all random orbiting motion ending up as a plane of ecliptic, that the Solar System at birth was fairly ordered initially. So if my demonstration is true and accurate, it has a few important implications. It implies the birth of the Sun was far earlier than any of the other planets. Otherwise they would have drifted and escaped the pull of the Sun. So let us say the Sun was borne 10 billion years ago and inner planets 7.5 billion and outer gas giants about 5 billion years ago. Same idea for Saturn Rings in that the Rings came far later after there was a well established planet of Saturn. So here in this chapter of Dirac new radioactivities and CellWell1 and CellWell2, I need to disprove the Nebular Dust Cloud theory by attacking the theory at is most strongest feature-- plane of ecliptic and Saturn Rings. The force of gravity makes different predictions on the creation of the plane of ecliptic as compared to the Positron-Space-gravity. Gravity uses angular momentum of the planetesimals whereas Positron- Space-gravity uses the Coulomb force to align the planets into the plane of ecliptic and the spin of the Sun. So the two competing theories have different predictions as to age of Sun relative to planets. And the two have different force strengths. For a Coulomb force is far stronger by a factor of 10^40 than is gravity. So for the Nebular Dust Cloud theory to explain why all the planets are in the ecliptic plane with Pluto 17 degrees out is a far tougher sell than is the stronger force of a Coulomb which can easily force planets into a ecliptic plane. So here I attack the Nebular Dust Cloud theory at its very strongest feature. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Coulomb force producing a plane of ecliptic in astronomy Experiment#155; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory
In my previous post I spoke of a Positron-Space-Gravity involving a
Coulomb force of attraction as producing the plane of Ecliptic effect for our Solar System and also for Saturn's Rings. In ordinary old gravity it is angular momentum of the planetesimals of the Nebular Dust Cloud theory. In Positron-Space-Gravity it is the combination of the Coulomb force as positrons in the center of a massive object with the spin of that massive object. I have never seen anything in physics of EM to suggest or hint that a attractive Coulomb force can give an arrangement of objects all in a plane of ecliptic. So I have to devise such an experiment and what I am thinking of is 3 dimensional balls suspended in air or in a liquid medium where it is warm enough to cause suspension and movement of the balls but not so hot as to affect the magnetism of the central object. So without the central object magnet the other balls would just randomly move in the liquid medium. But since the central object is magnetic it attracts the other balls and causes them to orbit around and given the spin of the central magnetic object it causes the other balls to eventually end up in a plane of ecliptic around the central object, given a long enough time period of operation. I wish there was a better experiment. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
math for this Coulomb-gravity Experiment #156; 3rd ed; Atom Totality(Atom Universe) theory
On Aug 18, 9:41*am, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote: In my previous post I spoke of a Positron-Space-Gravity involving a Coulomb force of attraction as producing the plane of Ecliptic effect for our Solar System and also for Saturn's Rings. In ordinary old gravity it is angular momentum of the planetesimals of the Nebular Dust Cloud theory. In Positron-Space-Gravity it is the combination of the Coulomb force as positrons in the center of a massive object with the spin of that massive object. I have never seen anything in physics of EM to suggest or hint that a attractive Coulomb force can give an arrangement of objects all in a plane of ecliptic. So I have to devise such an experiment and what I am thinking of is 3 dimensional balls suspended in air or in a liquid medium where it is warm enough to cause suspension and movement of the balls but not so hot as to affect the magnetism of the central object. So without the central object magnet the other balls would just randomly move in the liquid medium. But since the central object is magnetic it attracts the other balls and causes them to orbit around and given the spin of the central magnetic object it causes the other balls to eventually end up in a plane of ecliptic around the central object, given a long enough time period of operation. I wish there was a better experiment. Alright I have some math for this Experiment. Consider a test particle of some iron hollow ball with linear momentum at a 45 degree north latitude at distance y from a magnetic sphere that is spinning. Consider another hollow ball at 45 degrees south latitude at distance 2y from central spinning magnet. The magnet is only strong enough to cause the linear momentum to curve around and for those balls to be captured in orbit. So the question becomes, over time, do the two balls end up in an orbit around the equatorial plane of ecliptic of the central magnet? In other words each orbit of the balls is induced to come closer to the plane of ecliptic due to the equatorial spin of the magnet? The answer is yes as far as I can fathom in that the northern hemisphere ball is caused to come southward to the ecliptic plane and the southern hemisphere ball is caused to go northward and after x amount of orbits the two balls end up in orbit on the plane of ecliptic. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
computing when Pluto will join the Sun's ecliptic plane math forthis Coulomb-gravity Experiment #157; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe)theory
So in my prior post I outlined two test particles inclined at 45
degrees from the equatorial ecliptic plane of a central spinning magnet and asked how many orbits before the magnet reshaped both particles and caused them to lie in the ecliptic plane. We can ask the same question about the planet Pluto (my definition of planet has Pluto qualified). Pluto is tilted about 17 degrees off the plane of ecliptic. So how many years will it take for Pluto to be in conformity and orbit within the plane of ecliptic, provided that Positron-Space-Gravity is the truth? This may hint of an age of the Solar System and that Pluto and the gas giants are of a different age than is the inner planets and Sun. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
conservation of angular momentum only in an atom totality structure#142; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 6 | August 13th 09 04:00 PM |
Ida and moon Dactyl tests of gravity; #139; 3rd ed; Atom Totality(Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 10th 09 09:38 PM |
can solid-body rotation alone prove the Universe is an atom? #131;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 9th 09 05:57 AM |
where is the dark-matter, obviously, the Nucleus of the Atom Totality#127 ; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 7th 09 07:32 PM |
MECO theory reinforced by Atom Totality theory #48 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | May 21st 09 07:51 PM |