#21
|
|||
|
|||
Nasa ******s
"Frog" wrote in message
... snip I'm afraid you dont understand how it works. And you dont seem to understand the seriousness of your accusation. Just curious...if I were to refer to people that use remailers to SPAM newsgroups, as jackasses, would you sue me for comparing you to a beast of burden? Monday actualy and its already begun, In a phone call from my people regarding my faxes to them they explained that it can be done and surprisingly its not that difficult to do aparantly. My people get colleagues in your ISP's duristiction to file a charge of defamtaion and or slander/libel as the last two come under the first youll probably only be charged with the former. The court then issues an order to your ISP for your details. Then you will be served with the charges. What he said was not slander...He never never stated anything as fact, so I don't see how it is slanderous. You my friend are a horrible troll. Not very skilled. It is up to you to then contact your lawyers/representatives or do whatever you want. Wether you apear in court to answer the charge against you is up to you, you could find yourself in contempt if you dont. I would imagine under the circumstances and as you will have no evidence to back up your claim that I am a pedophile your lawyer will probably tell you to apear and apologise and admit you got it wrong. Then costs against you will be requested. Unfortunately I have been advised that this could take many months, it will not take weeks to resolve. I have also been advised not to converse with you any further on this matter as it could be construed that I have led you on to make further allegations. The phone call letter or kock at the door will be comming but it may be a while yet. WHAT!?!?!? You are going to send a kock to his door? That sounds like sexual harrasment. Please keep your kock to yourself, it does not belong in this NG. You know how lawyers like to drag things out and as youll be ultimately paying for mine and yours and my costs and any compensation..well what can I say. I will know more on Monday but as I say I cannot discuss this any further with you. All I can now do is sit back and wait and report any further allegations you make. I also have to report to my people copies of any further posts you make regarding this allegation. Including your post above. Your crack team of lawyers expects you to report on what happens here? They are not data collecting for the case? Sounds like they are pretty sucky lawyers to me. BV. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Nasa ******s
"BenignVanilla" writes: "Frog" wrote in message ... snip I'm afraid you dont understand how it works. And you dont seem to understand the seriousness of your accusation. Just curious...if I were to refer to people that use remailers to SPAM newsgroups, as jackasses, would you sue me for comparing you to a beast of burden? Being accused of one of the most hideous and despicable of crimes is not a funny matter. I suspect most people here if accused of such a hidious crime would follow the same action I am. Monday actualy and its already begun, In a phone call from my people regarding my faxes to them they explained that it can be done and surprisingly its not that difficult to do aparantly. My people get colleagues in your ISP's duristiction to file a charge of defamtaion and or slander/libel as the last two come under the first youll probably only be charged with the former. The court then issues an order to your ISP for your details. Then you will be served with the charges. What he said was not slander...He never never stated anything as fact, so I don't see how it is slanderous. You my friend are a horrible troll. Not very skilled. I'll go with what my people tell me thanks, I doubt I will ever need legal assistance from you....It may not be slander but it was sure defamation and I have had that confirmed thank you by those who know and not some usenet troll such as yourself. Slander comes under the defamation laws so there may be two instead of one charge, that will be determined but there is no doubt from my people that at least one charge will be brought in due course. It is up to you to then contact your lawyers/representatives or do whatever you want. Wether you apear in court to answer the charge against you is up to you, you could find yourself in contempt if you dont. I would imagine under the circumstances and as you will have no evidence to back up your claim that I am a pedophile your lawyer will probably tell you to apear and apologise and admit you got it wrong. Then costs against you will be requested. Unfortunately I have been advised that this could take many months, it will not take weeks to resolve. I have also been advised not to converse with you any further on this matter as it could be construed that I have led you on to make further allegations. The phone call letter or kock at the door will be comming but it may be a while yet. WHAT!?!?!? You are going to send a kock to his door? That sounds like sexual harrasment. Please keep your kock to yourself, it does not belong in this NG. Troll..... You know how lawyers like to drag things out and as youll be ultimately paying for mine and yours and my costs and any compensation..well what can I say. I will know more on Monday but as I say I cannot discuss this any further with you. All I can now do is sit back and wait and report any further allegations you make. I also have to report to my people copies of any further posts you make regarding this allegation. Including your post above. Your crack team of lawyers expects you to report on what happens here? They are not data collecting for the case? Sounds like they are pretty sucky lawyers to me. Of course I have been instructed to report any instance of the accuser repeating or commenting on their allegation, thats just common sense.....you really need to give reality a chance lad. If he/she repeats the allegation of course I will report it and send full faxed copy of the repeated allegation including full header information, I would be a fool not to as it can only help my case. BV. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Nasa ******s
"BenignVanilla" writes: "Frog" wrote in message ... snip Being accused of one of the most hideous and despicable of crimes is not a funny matter. I suspect most people here if accused of such a hidious crime would follow the same action I am. snip For the record...I think frogs are slimey little creatures. For the record I think kids should be banned from usenet.... You done yourself no favours over the last couple of days lad, no ones gonna take anything you say from now on seriously. BV. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Nasa ******s
"BenignVanilla" writes: "Frog" wrote in message ... "BenignVanilla" writes: "Frog" wrote in message ... snip Being accused of one of the most hideous and despicable of crimes is not a funny matter. I suspect most people here if accused of such a hidious crime would follow the same action I am. snip For the record...I think frogs are slimey little creatures. For the record I think kids should be banned from usenet.... You done yourself no favours over the last couple of days lad, no ones gonna take anything you say from now on seriously. How disappointing. I hope you for one put me in your killfile. LOL, I have no intentions of killfilling anyone lad, least of all you, other wise I would not be in a postion to point out your erronous posts to others, admittedly I may choose to ignore most of your posts but rest assured I'm watching and waiting to jump... BV. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Nasa ******s
"Frog" wrote in message
... snip LOL, I have no intentions of killfilling anyone lad, least of all you, other wise I would not be in a postion to point out your erronous posts to others, admittedly I may choose to ignore most of your posts but rest assured I'm watching and waiting to jump... snip That sounds great. I have no problem with someone maturely pointing out any errors that I may make. That will only serve to enhance the quality of the group. BV. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Nasa ******s
Mac writes: Fine. You have made your threat. It is not a threat. Now, take action. I told you yesterday its already underway... And, no, it does not need to take "months" I have been advised it may well take months, lawyers and courts are not the fasted things on earth you know. All you have to do is let the Newsgroup know when your attorney or your solicitor or your lawyer has everything drawn up. I dont let the newsgroup know anything, you show a complete lack of understanding of this process, I explained yesterday what is going to happen as was told to me over the phone by my people after reading my faxes....I wil know more on Monday I expect... Give the name of your legal representative. I dont give you that information, Your people can contact my people if they want once you have recived the charge/s against you. There is no reason for your people to contact mine or vice versa, it doesnt work like that. Give the address and telephone of your legal representative. See above.... Either I or my representative will contact this person and help expedite delivery. Again you are showing a completet lack of how this works That is NOT DISCUSSING THIS FURTHER. Oh really, in your post you have reposted your allegation again, you reposted it, now I have to forward that to my people as it looks as though you have indeed repeated the allegation... I sugest you seek proper legal advice BEFOR you comment on this any further because at the moment your digging a bigger hole for yourself. That is simply helping expedite the matter. The matter is and will be dealt with, I'm in no hurry. However, please do show the person exactly what was written. Are you reading what I have said befor because it doesnt seem that you are.... And have them carefully read it while you continue hiding behind your Annonymous Remailer while making your comments. You have made your threat: now, please take action. Again it is not a threat, and action has begun, I dont know how manny times I am going to have to say that until it sinks in with you. YOU need legal advice, they will no doubt tell you whatever you do dont repeat the allegation or comment on it for a third time!!. Prompt action. Maybe not Prompt, but it is action..... ---Mac |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Nasa ******s
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 23:06:40 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
wrote: On 10 Jul 2003 16:54:39 +0200, Frog wrote: Mac writes: On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 17:29:45 GMT, Anonymous ] wrote: Yeah I bet that stuck in your NASA throat eh Baalke!!....That us Brits could do something NASA cant..... When you gonna scrap that waste of money the ISS Baalke eh you know your just there spinning a story, how about telling the US of A tax payer what their money is being wasted on!!!! ************* ******** Poor little troll. Just as Daniel Joseph Min, he must use the Annonymous ReMailer's so favored by pedophiles and others who fear the light of day and must seek the shadows to cast their aspersions in the desperate hopes of enhancing their own image... ---Mac ******************* ************** LITTLE FROGGY... Are you saying I am a pedophile???. Copy of post taken lawyers in the wings waiting........ I'll give you twenty four hours to retract that accusation or get yourself a good lawyer. **************************** W. Anglesea: He hasn't called you a pedophile, but he's shown you up as an idiot. ************* *********** Well, thank you. It wasn't too difficult to show that person as an idiot; as a blustering, supercilious lad... Most of that effort was done by himself. Did you note his problems with distinguishing "your" and "you are =you're"... and in a post spelling "hassle" as "hastle" ?? That probably indicates his grade level while on school break. I find it amazing that you, and at least the other ten or twelve people sending me a message, were able to read what was stated and yet this one critter, and his "attorney", or his "solicitor", or, whatever, apparently are not able to do so.... It was interesting that most of those writing were also getting a chuckle out of LITTLE FROGGY's hiding beyind his Annonymous ReMailer, threatening an attorney, and refusing to divulge the name of the attorney to help expedite his "actions". Oh, well. By the way, Mr. Anglesea, keep posting. I do enjoy working through the information you provide ---Mac |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moon and Mars expeditions vs. RLV development | vthokie | Policy | 62 | March 30th 04 04:51 AM |
Pres. Kerry's NASA | ed kyle | Policy | 354 | March 11th 04 07:05 PM |
NASA's year of sorrow, recovery, progress and success | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | December 31st 03 07:28 PM |
NASA Selects Explorer Mission Proposals For Feasibility Studies | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 4th 03 10:14 PM |
NASA Celebrates Educational Benefits of Earth Science Week | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | October 10th 03 04:14 PM |