Press briefing on alleged Apollo secrets

The following announcement appears on the National Press Club
website:

http://npc.press.org/calendar/caldbe...?eventid=14033

Event Date: Oct. 30, 2007
Event Name: NASA Cover-Ups Continue
Event Type: News Conference
Time: 9:00 AM
Sponsored by: Enterprise Mission
Event Location: Zenger Room
Details: Fired NASA Whistleblower to Reveal New Apollo Secrets Kept
Classified by Space Agency for Over 40 Years.

Dr. Ken Johnston, former Manager of the Data and Photo Control
Division at NASA's Lunar Receiving Laboratory during the manned Apollo
Lunar Exploration Effort in the 1970's, was abruptly terminated
Tuesday morning, October 23rd, from NASA's prestigious "Solar System
Ambassador" (SSA) Program at JPL. The firing was direct reprisal for
Johnston's published account in a New York Times Best Seller, "Dark
Mission: the Secret History of NASA," of how NASA ordered him, 40
years ago, to destroy key Apollo lunar images and data -- rather than
allow them to be preserved for academic study and public view.
Johnston will testify at an Enterprise Mission sponsored National
Press Club news conference this Tuesday, October 30th (Zenger Room,
9:00 AM) , how he disobeyed these NASA orders, secretly preserving the
critical Apollo images. Johnston will then show some of the "missing"
Apollo frames -- which confirm the existence of long-rumored "ancient
artificial ruins and technology on the Moon," discovered by the Apollo
astronauts but legally classified under the 1958 Space Act by NASA for
over 40 years.

Johnston will be joined by Richard C. Hoagland, former NASA consultant
and CBS News Science Science Advisor during the Apollo lunar missions.
Hoagland is coauthor of "Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA,"
and head of The Enterprise Mission. Hoagland will present an imaging
analysis of Johnston's 40-year-old rescued Apollo images, comparing
them to modern versions apparently currently being "leaked" by other
"whistleblowers" on official NASA websites. He will also demonstrate
and analyze one of the secret technologies retrieved by the Apollo
crews, relating to the artificial control of gravity.

On Oct 30, 5:44 am, Axel Harvey wrote:
The following announcement appears on the National Press Club
website:

http://npc.press.org/calendar/caldbe...?eventid=14033

Event Date: Oct. 30, 2007
Event Name: NASA Cover-Ups Continue
Event Type: News Conference
Time: 9:00 AM
Sponsored by: Enterprise Mission
Event Location: Zenger Room
Details: Fired NASA Whistleblower to Reveal New Apollo Secrets Kept
Classified by Space Agency for Over 40 Years.

Dr. Ken Johnston, former Manager of the Data and Photo Control
Division at NASA's Lunar Receiving Laboratory during the manned Apollo
Lunar Exploration Effort in the 1970's, was abruptly terminated
Tuesday morning, October 23rd, from NASA's prestigious "Solar System
Ambassador" (SSA) Program at JPL. The firing was direct reprisal for
Johnston's published account in a New York Times Best Seller, "Dark
Mission: the Secret History of NASA," of how NASA ordered him, 40
years ago, to destroy key Apollo lunar images and data -- rather than
allow them to be preserved for academic study and public view.
Johnston will testify at an Enterprise Mission sponsored National
Press Club news conference this Tuesday, October 30th (Zenger Room,
9:00 AM) , how he disobeyed these NASA orders, secretly preserving the
critical Apollo images. Johnston will then show some of the "missing"
Apollo frames -- which confirm the existence of long-rumored "ancient
artificial ruins and technology on the Moon," discovered by the Apollo
astronauts but legally classified under the 1958 Space Act by NASA for
over 40 years.

Johnston will be joined by Richard C. Hoagland, former NASA consultant
and CBS News Science Science Advisor during the Apollo lunar missions.
Hoagland is coauthor of "Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA,"
and head of The Enterprise Mission. Hoagland will present an imaging
analysis of Johnston's 40-year-old rescued Apollo images, comparing
them to modern versions apparently currently being "leaked" by other
"whistleblowers" on official NASA websites. He will also demonstrate
and analyze one of the secret technologies retrieved by the Apollo
crews, relating to the artificial control of gravity.

Interesting as to how GOOGLE/NOVA space.history and any other usenet
group as hosting this topic was so quick to cut us off at the pass,
just before this "NASA Cover-Ups Continue" of their National Press
Club thing got underway. I'm also getting traumatised by those extra
butt-loads of their PC spermware/****ware that's trying every other
dirty trick in their Old Testament book in order to terminate my
usenet access. Meanwhile, other usenet groups are much less affected.

I have no personal doubts as to the possibility of there being
"ancient artificial ruins and technology on the Moon," as discovered
by our orbiting Apollo robotics (thought not as via astronauts) and
perhaps as having been legally classified under the 1958 Space Act by
NASA for over 40 years.

As to the demonstration and analyzing one of those supposed secret
technologies retrieved by the Apollo crews, relating to the artificial
control of gravity, is entirely proof positive of the ongoing ruse/
sting nature of this ongoing hocus-pocus fiasco, of the silly hype
worth of infowar/infomercial spewing that's at the very disinformation
root of most all things NASA and pretend-atheists at the same time.

There is simply no possible way that Ken or Richard are rogue agents
working outside of MI5/NSA/CIA~NASA orchestration or moderation, and
still alive to be sharing such secrets (far less crimes would get such
folks put into our secret prisons and if need be waterboarded to death
without so much as any speck of due process). It does our NASA much
good having such a insider ruse/sting ongoing, because it only makes
NASA look all that more believable. However, if this press event
brings further attention to our physically dark and somewhat salty old
moon that's always saturated in gamma, plus especially X-ray and
double IR nasty by day, then so be it.
- Brad Guth -

BTW, you folks do recall what happened to that certain other original
NASA safety engineer whistleblower and of his entire family, don't
you?

Not only did those pesky MIB manage to arrange that rather unfortunate
encounter with a locomotive, but also having scrubbed out his entire
safety report, as well as that of his field office and most of
everything else got scrubbed off the face of Earth, almost like he
never existed.

Perhaps something similar will happen to Dr. Ken Johnston. (does Ken
Johnston have a reliable posse that's packing heat?)

Or, is this simply another pretend sort of whistleblower ruse thing
that our government and NASA are really good at pulling off. (at least
if I were NASA, it's exactly what kind of stealth damage-control that
I'd be doing right about now)

It seems as though anything that further supports the notions of our
NASA/Apollo astronauts actually walking moonsuit butt naked on that
moon of ours is good enough, even if it comes by way of other
rusemasters trying to pull off whatever can suggest that we'd walked
on that dusty old moon with our unfiltered optics and Kodak film that
was somehow immune to such raw UV or even UV secondary/recoil photons,
and otherwise simply couldn't notice or much less record Venus.

It'll be interesting as to a head count and ID of those attending this
Enterprise Mission event.
- Brad Guth -

In all fairness, there may have been those lunar transported ETs, as
of once upon a time situated onboard our interstellar migrating icy
proto-moon, wheeas that's technically doable for the likes of
accommodating our frail DNA having survived such an exposed trek. A
thick layer of ice not only makes a perfectly terrific thermal
insulator, but it's also going to function darn good on behalf of
cosmic radiation shielding (a whole lot better off than any combined
terrestrial atmosphere and magnetosphere worth of Van Allen bets can
accommodate, as well as such ice [especially if it's made extra cold
and thus of hard salty ice] being rather nicely impact resistant).

This following press event should have been well enough over by now,
with at the very least some viable info along with one or more of
those supposed taboo NASA/Apollo images that we've never before seen,
as for getting usenet posted by at least one soul. I wonder what's
taking so long? (didn't anyone show up?)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...a4f5446390fdcc

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...7f86034fb4b63a

Interesting as to how GOOGLE/NOVA sci.space.history and any other
usenet group as hosting this topic was so quick to cut us off at the
pass, and just in time before this "NASA Cover-Ups Continue" of their
National Press Club thing got underway. For the record, I'm also
getting summarily traumatised by those extra butt-loads of their PC
spermware/****ware that's trying every other dirty trick in their Old
Testament book in order to terminate my usenet access, or at least
capable of remote terminating my mouse. Meanwhile, other usenet
groups without having this topic have been much less affected if at
all.

I have no personal doubts as to the possibility of there having been
"ancient artificial ruins and technology on the Moon," as discovered
by our orbiting Apollo robotics (thought not as recorded via
astronauts) and perhaps as such having been legally classified under
the 1958 Space Act by NASA for the past 40+ years.

As to the demonstration and analyzing one of those supposed secret
technologies retrieved by the Apollo crews, relating to the artificial
control of gravity, is entirely proof positive of the ongoing ruse/
sting nature of this forever hocus-pocus fiasco, of the silly hype
worth of infowar/infomercial spewing that's at the very disinformation
root of most all things NASA and pretend-atheists at the same time.

There is simply no possible way that Ken or Richard are actually rogue
agents working outside of MI5/NSA/CIA~NASA orchestration or
moderation, and still alive to be sharing such supposed secrets (far
less crimes would get such folks put into our secret prisons and if
need be waterboarded to death without so much as any speck of due
process). I would believe that it does our NASA much good having such
a insider ruse/sting ongoing, because it only makes everything else
NASA look all that more believable. However, if this press event
brings further attention to our physically dark and somewhat salty old
moon that's always saturated in gamma, plus especially X-ray and
double IR nasty by day, then so be it.

BTW, you folks do recall what happened to that certain other original
NASA safety engineer whistleblower and of his entire family, don't
you?

Not only did those pesky MIB manage to arrange that rather unfortunate
encounter with a locomotive, but also having scrubbed out his entire
safety report, as well as that of his field office and most of
everything else got scrubbed off the face of Earth, almost like he
never existed.

Perhaps something similar will happen to Dr. Ken Johnston. (does Ken
Johnston have a reliable posse that's packing heat?) Or, is this
simply another pretend sort of whistleblower ruse thing that our
government and NASA are really good at pulling off. (at least if I
were NASA, it's exactly what kind of stealth damage-control that I'd
be doing right about now)

It seems as though anything that further supports the notions of our
NASA/Apollo astronauts actually walking moonsuit butt naked on that
moon of ours is good enough, even if it comes by way of other
rusemasters trying to pull off whatever can suggest that we'd walked
on that dusty old moon with our unfiltered optics and Kodak film that
was somehow immune to such raw UV or even UV secondary/recoil photons,
and otherwise simply couldn't notice or much less record Venus.

It'll be downright interesting as to a head count and ID of those
attending this Enterprise Mission news event. I wonder what sort of
back page of which obscure newspaper or publication it'll get reported
upon? (perhaps Play Boy or LeapFrog will run something in pop-up
format)
- Brad Guth -

In all possible fairness, there may have been those lunar transported
ETs, as of once upon a time situated onboard our interstellar
migrating icy proto-moon, wheeas that's technically doable for the
likes of accommodating our frail DNA having to survive such an exposed
trek. A thick layer of ice not only makes a perfectly terrific
thermal insulator, but it's also going to function darn good on behalf
of cosmic radiation shielding (a whole lot better off than any
combined terrestrial atmosphere and magnetosphere worth of Van Allen
bets can accommodate, as well as such ice [especially if it's made
extra cold and thus of hard salty ice] being rather nicely impact
resistant).

This following press event should have been well enough over by now,
with at the very least some viable info along with one or more of
those supposed taboo NASA/Apollo images that we've never before seen,
as for their getting usenet posted by at least one soul. I wonder
what's taking so long? (didn't anyone bother to show up?)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...a4f5446390fdcc

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...7f86034fb4b63a

Interesting as to how GOOGLE/NOVA sci.space.history and any other
usenet group as hosting this topic was so quick to cut us off at the
pass, and just in time before this "NASA Cover-Ups Continue" of their
National Press Club thing got underway. For the record, I'm also
getting summarily traumatised by those extra butt-loads of their PC
spermware/****ware that's trying every other dirty trick in their Old
Testament book in order to terminate my usenet access, or at least
capable of remote terminating my mouse. Meanwhile, other usenet
groups without having this topic have been much less affected if at
all.

I have no personal doubts as to the possibility of there having been
"ancient artificial ruins and technology on the Moon," as discovered
by our orbiting Apollo robotics (thought not as recorded via
astronauts) and perhaps as such having been legally classified under
the 1958 Space Act by NASA for the past 40+ years.

As to the demonstration and analyzing one of those supposed secret
technologies retrieved by the Apollo crews, relating to the artificial
control of gravity, is entirely proof positive of the ongoing ruse/
sting nature of this forever hocus-pocus fiasco, of the silly hype
worth of infowar/infomercial spewing that's at the very disinformation
root of most all things NASA and pretend-atheists at the same time.

There is simply no possible way that Ken or Richard are actually rogue
agents working outside of MI5/NSA/CIA~NASA orchestration or
moderation, and still alive to be sharing such supposed secrets (far
less crimes would get such folks put into our secret prisons and if
need be waterboarded to death without so much as any speck of due
process). I would believe that it does our NASA much good having such
a insider ruse/sting ongoing, because it only makes everything else
NASA look all that more believable. However, if this press event
brings further attention to our physically dark and somewhat salty old
moon that's always saturated in gamma, plus especially X-ray and
double IR nasty by day, then so be it.

BTW, you folks do recall what happened to that certain other original
NASA safety engineer whistleblower and of his entire family, don't
you?

Not only did those pesky MIB manage to arrange that rather unfortunate
encounter with a locomotive, but also having scrubbed out his entire
safety report, as well as that of his field office and most of
everything else got scrubbed off the face of Earth, almost like he
never existed.

Perhaps something similar will happen to Dr. Ken Johnston. (does Ken
Johnston have a reliable posse that's packing heat?) Or, is this
simply another pretend sort of whistleblower ruse thing that our
government and NASA are really good at pulling off. (at least if I
were NASA, it's exactly what kind of stealth damage-control that I'd
be doing right about now)

It seems as though anything that further supports the notions of our
NASA/Apollo astronauts actually walking moonsuit butt naked on that
moon of ours is good enough, even if it comes by way of other
rusemasters trying to pull off whatever can suggest that we'd walked
on that dusty old moon with our unfiltered optics and Kodak film that
was somehow immune to such raw UV or even UV secondary/recoil photons,
and otherwise simply couldn't notice or much less record Venus.

It'll be downright interesting as to a head count and ID of those
attending this Enterprise Mission news event. I wonder what sort of
obscure back page of which newspaper or publication it'll get reported
upon? (perhaps Play Boy or LeapFrog will run something in pop-up
format)
- Brad Guth -

On Oct 30, 10:45 pm, BradGuth wrote:
In all possible fairness, there may have been those lunar transported
ETs, as of once upon a time situated onboard our interstellar
migrating icy proto-moon, wheeas that's technically doable for the
likes of accommodating our frail DNA having to survive such an exposed
trek. A thick layer of ice not only makes a perfectly terrific
thermal insulator, but it's also going to function darn good on behalf
of cosmic radiation shielding (a whole lot better off than any
combined terrestrial atmosphere and magnetosphere worth of Van Allen
bets can accommodate, as well as such ice [especially if it's made
extra cold and thus of hard salty ice] being rather nicely impact
resistant).

This following press event should have been well enough over by now,
with at the very least some viable info along with one or more of
those supposed taboo NASA/Apollo images that we've never before seen,
as for their getting usenet posted by at least one soul. I wonder
what's taking so long? (didn't anyone bother to show up?)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s..._frm/thread/f3...

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...ead/666efb808a...

Interesting as to how GOOGLE/NOVA sci.space.history and any other
usenet group as hosting this topic was so quick to cut us off at the
pass, and just in time before this "NASA Cover-Ups Continue" of their
National Press Club thing got underway. For the record, I'm also
getting summarily traumatised by those extra butt-loads of their PC
spermware/****ware that's trying every other dirty trick in their Old
Testament book in order to terminate my usenet access, or at least
capable of remote terminating my mouse. Meanwhile, other usenet
groups without having this topic have been much less affected if at
all.

I have no personal doubts as to the possibility of there having been
"ancient artificial ruins and technology on the Moon," as discovered
by our orbiting Apollo robotics (thought not as recorded via
astronauts) and perhaps as such having been legally classified under
the 1958 Space Act by NASA for the past 40+ years.

As to the demonstration and analyzing one of those supposed secret
technologies retrieved by the Apollo crews, relating to the artificial
control of gravity, is entirely proof positive of the ongoing ruse/
sting nature of this forever hocus-pocus fiasco, of the silly hype
worth of infowar/infomercial spewing that's at the very disinformation
root of most all things NASA and pretend-atheists at the same time.

There is simply no possible way that Ken or Richard are actually rogue
agents working outside of MI5/NSA/CIA~NASA orchestration or
moderation, and still alive to be sharing such supposed secrets (far
less crimes would get such folks put into our secret prisons and if
need be waterboarded to death without so much as any speck of due
process). I would believe that it does our NASA much good having such
a insider ruse/sting ongoing, because it only makes everything else
NASA look all that more believable. However, if this press event
brings further attention to our physically dark and somewhat salty old
moon that's always saturated in gamma, plus especially X-ray and
double IR nasty by day, then so be it.

BTW, you folks do recall what happened to that certain other original
NASA safety engineer whistleblower and of his entire family, don't
you?

Not only did those pesky MIB manage to arrange that rather unfortunate
encounter with a locomotive, but also having scrubbed out his entire
safety report, as well as that of his field office and most of
everything else got scrubbed off the face of Earth, almost like he
never existed.

Perhaps something similar will happen to Dr. Ken Johnston. (does Ken
Johnston have a reliable posse that's packing heat?) Or, is this
simply another pretend sort of whistleblower ruse thing that our
government and NASA are really good at pulling off. (at least if I
were NASA, it's exactly what kind of stealth damage-control that I'd
be doing right about now)

It seems as though anything that further supports the notions of our
NASA/Apollo astronauts actually walking moonsuit butt naked on that
moon of ours is good enough, even if it comes by way of other
rusemasters trying to pull off whatever can suggest that we'd walked
on that dusty old moon with our unfiltered optics and Kodak film that
was somehow immune to such raw UV or even UV secondary/recoil photons,
and otherwise simply couldn't notice or much less record Venus.

It'll be downright interesting as to a head count and ID of those
attending this Enterprise Mission news event. I wonder what sort of
obscure back page of which newspaper or publication it'll get reported
upon? (perhaps Play Boy or LeapFrog will run something in pop-up
format)
- Brad Guth -

Thus far, still no public press coverage, or much less of anything
from LeapFrog about squat of what's supposedly so moon like for real
about those xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated terrain photographs of
our guano island pretend it's a moon setting. Even close Kodak shots
of that supposed modified rock are not telling us what and/or how any
of that thick and sticky moon dust managed to get out of those deep
cracks, and of that supposed artificial tower item is just looking too
gosh darn hocus pocus, as though it was something in the guano island
background or on stage that wasn't supposed to be there, as otherwise
it's made of whatever's nearly as black as or darker than coal.

There's actually some extremely weird stuff as robotic photographed
from orbit that's entirely believable as being somewhat artificial
looking, and otherwise just plain old naturally weird about our
physically dark and nasty moon that's oddly somewhat salty.
- Brad Guth -