A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIET missions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old April 26th 08, 07:52 AM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

On Apr 25, 11:10 pm, J Waggoner wrote:
Frankly if you want to embarrass yourself go ahead. The Chinese
certainly haven't come out and said we didn't land either. and in 1968
BEFORE Nixon visited were supporting the North Vietnamese....

So are you saying NASA duped Mao Tse Dung and Leonid Breshnev ?

AND ANSWER THAT QUESTION DON"T AVOID IT )

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:46:51 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth

wrote:
On Mar 22, 10:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote:
When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this
fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all
probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions.
This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed
remnants. Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on
display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the
open minded, the more evidence the merrier....


On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said
Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary
Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC).


Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's
sightseeing abilities should set the record straight.
Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship


VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration
Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018.


LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That
includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch
down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent
Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC
see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson
told SPACE.com.


"We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages
sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the
overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve
such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see
the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said.


Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky,
LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the
Moon's crater-pocked terrain.


Heading "Down Memory Lane"
Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html


Mythbusters should also check this one out.


Now we're being so kindly informed once again, and this time by the
warm and fuzzy plus otherwise wizardly likes of Eric Chomko, as well
as from the full swarm like support of all else that's Borg like pro-
NASA, that of whatever albedo is actually dependent upon the viewing
distance, and even as much as not hardly worth mentioning as having to
do with the angle of solar illumination.


Phobos in color and 3D http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s..._frm/thread/ea...


Apparently, even sunrise or sunset angles of local illumination for
Eric Chomko only increases the reflective nature of a given surface
that's otherwise on average nearly coal like, especially of those
pesky off-world kinds of places that simply don't have to play by
those pesky regular laws of physics, and to make things a whole lot
worse, is if using a polarized optical element gives the local terrain
of our moon yet another minimum boost of 2:1 or greater albedo. No
wonder that NASA/Apollo moon looked so EVA locally reflective, as
though exactly like a certain 0.65~0.75 albedo worth of a guano
island, as well as for why those various colors of known items looked
exactly as though having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated.


I don't want others to think that I'm nearly as smart as Eric Chomko,
although actual terrestrial coal seems smarter than Eric, not to
mention corporate Kodak or any other commercial film supplier. Of
course, we all know that not one outside living soul (meaning other
than dominated by and/or in debt to NASA/Apollo) has ever set their
naked eye or much less of any perfectly failsafe (meaning zero harm)
digital scanner upon any one of all those thousands of NASA/Apollo
mission related Kodak moments.


If some of us didn't know better, you'd think our NASA and of those
having "the right stuff" were trying really hard to hide something.
. - Brad Guth


It takes two to tango, although the more the better.

Are you actually going to suggest that our cold-war wasn't mutually
orchestrated, and thus wasn't perpetrated for government job security
and the profits taken by those playing along?
.. - Brad Guth
  #32  
Old April 26th 08, 11:26 AM posted to sci.space.history
Dale Carlson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 211
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIET missions

On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:10:25 -0500, J Waggoner
wrote:

Frankly if you want to embarrass yourself go ahead. The Chinese
certainly haven't come out and said we didn't land either. and in 1968
BEFORE Nixon visited were supporting the North Vietnamese....

So are you saying NASA duped Mao Tse Dung and Leonid Breshnev ?

AND ANSWER THAT QUESTION DON"T AVOID IT )


Geez, Adlai, chill....
  #33  
Old April 26th 08, 06:51 PM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

On Apr 25, 9:03 pm, "Scott Hedrick" wrote:
"J Waggoner" wrote in message

...

Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's
sightseeing abilities should set the record straight.


Why? They'll claim those images were faked as well.

Don't make the assumption that *data* is the issue here. They have *faith*
that the moon landings were a hoax, and any data to the contrary is
obviously faked.

** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**


Now you are being such a silly brown-nosed minion of DARPA (aka
Semitic Third Reich). Why the hell would such multiple forms of
independently peer replicated science be thought of as bogus?

You must have been thinking of those bogus Muslim WMD, because that's
the whole truth and nothing but the truth that you can take to any one
of your offshore bank accounts, that which directly benefit from the
artificially inflated $120/barrel of bloody crude oil, and otherwise
favor the systematic global screwing of humanity and trashing of our
badly failing environment at the same time.
.. - Brad Guth
  #34  
Old June 2nd 08, 01:05 AM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

Why is this good topic getting ready to fall off the edge of Earth (so
to speak)?

Where's all of the Usenet/newsgroup spunk?
.. - Brad Guth


On Apr 26, 10:51 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Apr 25, 9:03 pm, "Scott Hedrick" wrote:

"J Waggoner" wrote in message


.. .


Take note. For you "Apollolandings were ahoax" believers LROC's
sightseeing abilities should set the record straight.


Why? They'll claim those images were faked as well.


Don't make the assumption that *data* is the issue here. They have *faith*
that themoonlandings were ahoax, and any data to the contrary is
obviously faked.


** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**


Now you are being such a silly brown-nosed minion of DARPA (aka
Semitic Third Reich). Why the hell would such multiple forms of
independently peer replicated science be thought of as bogus?

You must have been thinking of those bogus Muslim WMD, because that's
the whole truth and nothing but the truth that you can take to any one
of your offshore bank accounts, that which directly benefit from the
artificially inflated $120/barrel of bloody crude oil, and otherwise
favor the systematic global screwing of humanity and trashing of our
badly failing environment at the same time.
. - Brad Guth


  #35  
Old June 2nd 08, 01:07 AM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

On Apr 25, 9:03 pm, "Scott Hedrick" wrote:
"J Waggoner" wrote in message

...

Take note. For you "Apollolandings were ahoax" believers LROC's
sightseeing abilities should set the record straight.


Why? They'll claim those images were faked as well.

Don't make the assumption that *data* is the issue here. They have *faith*
that themoonlandings were ahoax, and any data to the contrary is
obviously faked.


You know darn good and will that such is not the case, never has
been.
.. - BG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS "later that it was all a hoax" [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 4 June 7th 05 01:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.