|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Time to Think ‘Horizontal’ for Future Space Launches
On Sep 21, 12:46*pm, Doug Freyburger wrote:
It's just like the mountain based rail launcher on the old puppet show Fireball XL-5! *I liked that show just as much as All Thunderbrids Are Go. Of course, this concept has been around for quite a while. There was the rocket launched from a rail in the movie "When Worlds Collide" as one example. I think that back in the 1930s, it was taken for granted that a rocket to be launched into space would need to be launched from a very long rail. Burroughs' Venus novels had the premise of a wealthy American building such a launch rail privately in Mexico or somewhere in Latin America. The German propaganda film from 1937, Weltraumschiff 1 Startet, also involved a launch rail. As did the covers of several science-fiction magazines from the 1930s, if I'm not mistaken. John Savard |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Time_to_Think_Horizontal_for_Future_Space_Launches ?
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:49:59 -0700 (PDT), I wrote, in part:
There was the rocket launched from a rail in the movie "When Worlds Collide" as one example. I see these posts made it to USENET, although for some reason they were not visible on Google Groups. Previously, on this forum, I noted that even if an electromagnetic launch from a rail is not currently feasible on Earth, it is vastly easier to attain a method of cheap access to space of that kind than it would be to build a "space elevator". Well, in searching for information on the history of the old idea of using a launch rail, I found this site: http://www.g2mil.com/skyramp.htm which notes that while electromagnetic launches are not now practical, the use of a rocket sled or pneumatic launches are a good idea. John Savard http://www.quadibloc.com/index.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Time_to_Think_Horizontal_for_Future_Space_Launches ?
On 9/22/2010 3:05 PM, John Savard wrote:
Previously, on this forum, I noted that even if an electromagnetic launch from a rail is not currently feasible on Earth, it is vastly easier to attain a method of cheap access to space of that kind than it would be to build a "space elevator". Well, in searching for information on the history of the old idea of using a launch rail, I found this site: http://www.g2mil.com/skyramp.htm which notes that while electromagnetic launches are not now practical, the use of a rocket sled or pneumatic launches are a good idea. The Air Force looked into this under SDI (even made a CGI video of a launch of a Scramjet TAV zooming along a desert rail launcher that they used for recruiting) but decided it was a non-starter. One interesting aspect of this could be related to something that Sandia Laboratories came up with as SDI was winding down, called the SERAPHIM maglev rail system: http://www.monorails.org/webpix%202/Seraphim101401.pdf That's a very interesting choice of names, as the U-2's classified name was "Angel" and the A-12's was "Archangel"...Seraphim are the next rank up from Archangels; so maybe this was related to the launch rail for a scramjet powered successor for strategic reconnaissance/strike? Since the scramjet might be fueled by liquid hydrogen, you could submerge the magnetic drive coil system in the LH2 tank and make it superconducting. Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time to Think ‘Horizontal’ for Future Space Launches | [email protected] | Policy | 577 | December 15th 10 04:55 PM |
Time travel into the future | Hannu Poropudas | Astronomy Misc | 3 | July 20th 07 02:58 PM |
NASA Announces Future Shuttle Launches Will Be Sudden And Without Warning | rk | Space Shuttle | 0 | January 12th 06 05:58 AM |
Time to put the Space Shuttle painlessly to sleep .... and return to SPACE work that's got a future ! | Alec | Space Station | 0 | August 13th 05 08:10 PM |
Time to put the Space Shuttle painlessly to sleep .... and return to SPACE work that's got a future ! | Alec | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 13th 05 08:08 PM |