A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Albert Einstein Institute Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 7th 20, 11:10 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Albert Einstein Institute Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity

Albert Einstein Institute's text below unwittingly disproves Einstein's relativity. We have the formula

(frequency measured by receiver) = (speed of light relative to receiver) / (distance between pulses).

Since "distances between subsequent pulses are not affected", and the frequency increases for the moving receiver, the speed of the light pulses relative to the moving receiver increases as well, in accordance with the above formula.

Albert Einstein Institute: "In the above paragraphs, we have only considered moving sources. In fact, a closer look at cases where it is the receiver that is in motion will show that this kind of motion leads to a very similar kind of Doppler effect. Here is an animation of the receiver moving towards the source:

https://www.einstein-online.info/wp-...ein-Online.gif

By observing the two indicator lights, you can see for yourself that, once more, there is a blue-shift - the pulse frequency measured at the receiver is somewhat higher than the frequency with which the pulses are sent out. This time, the distances between subsequent pulses are not affected, but still there is a frequency shift." http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/doppler.html

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
  #2  
Old August 7th 20, 04:34 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Albert Einstein Institute Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity

Einstein's ideology is so all-powerful that the Albert Einstein Institute can safely tell the truth sometimes (the scientific community neither notices nor cares):

Albert Einstein Institute: "...you do not need general relativity to derive the correct prediction for the gravitational redshift. A combination of Newtonian gravity, a particle theory of light, and the weak equivalence principle (gravitating mass equals inertial mass) suffices. [...] The gravitational redshift was first measured on earth in 1960-65 by Pound, Rebka, and Snider at Harvard University..." http://www.einstein-online.info/spot...te_dwarfs.html

Yes, the Pound-Rebka experiment proved that the speed of light falling in gravity varies as per Newton's theory:

R. V. Pound and J. L. Snider, Effect of Gravity on Gamma Radiation: "It is not our purpose here to enter into the many-sided discussion of the relationship between the effect under study and general relativity or energy conservation. It is to be noted that no strictly relativistic concepts are involved and the description of the effect as an "apparent weight" of photons is suggestive. The velocity difference predicted is identical to that which a material object would acquire in free fall for a time equal to the time of flight." http://virgo.lal.in2p3.fr/NPAC/relat...iers/pound.pdf

"To see why a deflection of light would be expected, consider Figure 2-17, which shows a beam of light entering an accelerating compartment. Successive positions of the compartment are shown at equal time intervals. Because the compartment is accelerating, the distance it moves in each time interval increases with time. The path of the beam of light, as observed from inside the compartment, is therefore a parabola. But according to the equivalence principle, there is no way to distinguish between an accelerating compartment and one with uniform velocity in a uniform gravitational field. We conclude, therefore, that A BEAM OF LIGHT WILL ACCELERATE IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD AS DO OBJECTS WITH REST MASS. For example, near the surface of Earth light will fall with acceleration 9.8 m/s^2." http://web.pdx.edu/~pmoeck/books/Tipler_Llewellyn.pdf

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Richard Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 August 4th 20 01:56 PM
Albert Einstein Institute Inadvertently Disproves Relativity Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 September 30th 17 01:28 PM
ALBERT EINSTEIN INSTITUTE DEBUNKS EINSTEIN Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 July 12th 15 09:47 PM
ALBERT EINSTEIN INSTITUTE REFUTES RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 August 6th 14 08:27 AM
THE ALBERT EINSTEIN INSTITUTE REFUTES ALBERT EINSTEIN Tonico Astronomy Misc 0 April 1st 12 01:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.