|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
You are such a poor shot that you couldn't throw an AA battery from orbit and have a hope of even hitting the earth.
"Anonymous" wrote in message . com...
[snip] Both ideas make use of several feet of compressible carbon such as was on the legs of the lunar lander modules to cushion the landing on earth - Pilots who have to make rough landings generally choose parachutes. That way your own legs soften the laanding, and you get more control over the landing site as well. So I would remove the soft landing requirement and replace it with explosive bolts which open the capsule at 15Km altitude, a small oxygen bottle, and a good parachute with a reserve and an emergency life raft. either on land or in the water. The landing area for the orbital canister would probably have to be largely random on earth - so if you came down in a volcano or a North Korean military camp you would just be plain out of luck. Guidance would be a good idea, I think. But how is this for an idea: Instead of using a retrorocket to deorbit, you could deploy a large and very light parachute while still in orbit. I am thinking in terms of 10000m^2 or so of thin plastic sheet. It could be deployed by a puff of CO2 gas from a small bottle, and then finally inflated by aerodynamic drag at altitude. This would be unlikely to work from 600Km but it might be a goer at 200Km. What do you think? [snip] I'm guessing that the biggest problems with this idea would be in order: 1 - Time to atmosphere would be too great for the amount of air. As long as you can recirculate your oxygen and extract excess CO2 this should not be a great issue. A couple of days on a tank of air sounds feasible to me. 2 - Danger to people on earth from canister hitting them Despite our best efforts at filling up the earth this is still not a major issue. Most of the earth, especially the oceans is quite empty. 3 - Heat build up inside the canister This might be an issue during the "cruise phase" before re-entry because the occupant will be generating heat and this can be difficult to dispose of in vacuum. If you mean heating during re-entry then I would not be as concerned. Ablative heat shields do a good job of disposing of frictional heat. 4 - Deceleration forces to great to survive A badly designed capsule will expose the occupant to 100G or so which is not fatal unless it goes on for too long. With a good aerodynamic design it should be possible to maintain altitude during aerobraking and keep G loads under 100m/s/s or so. 5 - Looking at Earth to fire a re-entry burst is not good enough to hit it. You only really have to fire roughly backwards to break out of orbit. This should not be hard. Aiming for a particular landing sight might be more difficult. I can imagine a simple flight control system which works out the orbital elements from GPS data and then chooses the right time for the de-orbit burn to put the landing close to a designated safe location, many of which would be pre-programmed into it. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|