|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
BBC Article on the ISS toilet
This BBC article is full of facts, but are all of them correct?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8158350.stm In particular is it true that "The main toilet, a multi-million-dollar Russian-built unit, was flown up and installed on the US side of the space station last year."? Does it really cost so much? I mean, the unit itself cost so much? I also don't remember that last year "a Russian cosmonaut complained that he was no longer allowed to use the US toilet because of billing and cost issues." but that is probably my fault. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
BBC Article on the ISS toilet
IC2 wrote:
This BBC article is full of facts, but are all of them correct? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8158350.stm In particular is it true that "The main toilet, a multi-million-dollar Russian-built unit, was flown up and installed on the US side of the space station last year."? Does it really cost so much? I mean, the unit itself cost so much? Yes. I also don't remember that last year "a Russian cosmonaut complained that he was no longer allowed to use the US toilet because of billing and cost issues." but that is probably my fault. It is true. The US started charging in retaliation for Russia charging for US astronauts to use the Russian toilet. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
BBC Article on the ISS toilet
I think the issue of who uses what toilet is seen as a huge joke up on
station. No matter what the bean counters say, when you gotta go... As for cost, well, both toilets seem to use the same bits, and goodness knows how much the items cost. From listening to the comms yesterday, it sounds to me like the Russians wanted to do as they often do on their toilet, a quick clean out and a restart, but the americans, not wanting to merely delay the next failure, decided it would be best to replace the items just in case. There did seem to be some jokular banter on station about the various attitudes on the ground, though of course it was not said in so many words, I gather that the politics of the ground based folk never ceases to amaze the astronauts, who tolerate their masters ways in much the same way that we tolerate mosquitos. grin. Brian -- Brian Gaff - Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff' in the display name may be lost. Blind user, so no pictures please! "IC2" wrote in message ... This BBC article is full of facts, but are all of them correct? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8158350.stm In particular is it true that "The main toilet, a multi-million-dollar Russian-built unit, was flown up and installed on the US side of the space station last year."? Does it really cost so much? I mean, the unit itself cost so much? I also don't remember that last year "a Russian cosmonaut complained that he was no longer allowed to use the US toilet because of billing and cost issues." but that is probably my fault. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
BBC Article on the ISS toilet
Brian Gaff wrote:
I think the issue of who uses what toilet is seen as a huge joke up on station. No matter what the bean counters say, when you gotta go... I think it may also have to do with the original ISS contracts whereby Russia agreed to support the US segment for ECLSS and Soyuz for a certain number of years and/or until a certain assembly stage. Assuming the USA urine recycler works reliably enough to be in production (as opposed to being in testing/debugging), wouldn't the USA invite the russians to bring their urine to the USA segment for processing ? And since the Russians have the only working trash can (Progress) where non-urine output from the toilets can be disposed, I would think that both would work in a symbiotic relationship for the toilets, especially since both toilets share a lot of commonality for parts, servicing. On the other hand, if a toilet has to be maintained after each X uses, then the scheduling for maintenance may be thrown off if crews start to use the other toilet because that would bring its maintenance task forwards. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
BBC Article on the ISS toilet
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message om... I had to laugh tyesterday when they found the russian and American spares in the same bag, and when the part number was read out, the ground said theat the part number they needed was the american one, not the Russian one which meant nothing to them, even though the two parts were in fact identical. There did seem to be a certain amount aof suppressed impatience on station to my ears. It sounds like both toilets are the same Russian design. Why there would be separate US and Russian part numbers on the two identical parts, who the heck knows. Maybe the Russians are charging NASA for spare toilet parts. Nice racket. Jeff -- "Take heart amid the deepening gloom that your dog is finally getting enough cheese" - Deteriorata - National Lampoon |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
BBC Article on the ISS toilet
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
BBC Article on the ISS toilet
"Jeff Findley" wrote:
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message . com... I had to laugh tyesterday when they found the russian and American spares in the same bag, and when the part number was read out, the ground said theat the part number they needed was the american one, not the Russian one which meant nothing to them, even though the two parts were in fact identical. There did seem to be a certain amount aof suppressed impatience on station to my ears. It sounds like both toilets are the same Russian design. Why there would be separate US and Russian part numbers on the two identical parts, who the heck knows. Almost certainly because the US and Russia use different part and numbering tracking schemes. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/ -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
BBC Article on the ISS toilet
"Derek Lyons" wrote in message ... "Jeff Findley" wrote: "Brian Gaff" wrote in message .com... I had to laugh tyesterday when they found the russian and American spares in the same bag, and when the part number was read out, the ground said theat the part number they needed was the american one, not the Russian one which meant nothing to them, even though the two parts were in fact identical. There did seem to be a certain amount aof suppressed impatience on station to my ears. It sounds like both toilets are the same Russian design. Why there would be separate US and Russian part numbers on the two identical parts, who the heck knows. Almost certainly because the US and Russia use different part and numbering tracking schemes. Agreed. But if one part has a US number and the other a Russian number, that implies ownership. One could imagine a scenario where that same part breaks again on the US toilet, only to have the Russians tell NASA, "Sorry, but you already used your spare part. You'll have to buy a new one and we'll ship it up on the next Progress/Shuttle flight." Jeff -- "Take heart amid the deepening gloom that your dog is finally getting enough cheese" - Deteriorata - National Lampoon |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
BBC Article on the ISS toilet
Jeff Findley wrote:
Agreed. But if one part has a US number and the other a Russian number, that implies ownership. One could imagine a scenario where that same part breaks again on the US toilet, only to have the Russians tell NASA, "Sorry, but you already used your spare part. You'll have to buy a new one and we'll ship it up on the next Progress/Shuttle flight." And this is why the ISS project is a good learning experience. It isn't just how to design an electrical/data interface with other partners, but also how to properly manage its operation. The managers will eventually realise the foolisheness of their current "it's mine" policy and end up working with each other to share toilets and spare parts. There may be some accounting behind the scenes if the americans buy a part from the russians and end up lending it to the russians in space to fix their toilet. Having separate spare part inventories for the same device is rather silly, especially when you consider the limited cargo upmass they will have once shuttle is retired. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ISS toilet row | Pat Flannery | History | 2 | April 21st 09 09:32 PM |
ISS toilet lunacy | Pat Flannery | History | 11 | August 14th 08 08:45 PM |
ISS toilet lunacy | Pat Flannery | Space Station | 9 | August 14th 08 05:14 PM |
ISS toilet lunacy | Pat Flannery | Policy | 9 | August 14th 08 05:14 PM |
W. Ferris article in Sky and Telescope August 2003 article on ODM | PrisNo6 | Amateur Astronomy | 25 | August 11th 03 08:02 PM |