A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIET missions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old March 24th 08, 05:18 PM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

On Mar 22, 9:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote:
When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this
fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all
probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions.
This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed
remnants. Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on
display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the
open minded, the more evidence the merrier....

On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said
Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary
Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC).

Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's
sightseeing abilities should set the record straight.
Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship

VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration
Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018.

LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That
includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch
down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent
Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC
see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson
told SPACE.com.

"We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages
sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the
overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve
such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see
the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said.

Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky,
LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the
Moon's crater-pocked terrain.

Heading "Down Memory Lane"
Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html



Where's Venus hiding within Apollo missions 11, 14 and 16?

Why are all the public simulators forbidden to include Venus as
otherwise easily seen from our physically dark moon?
.. - Brad Guth
  #12  
Old March 24th 08, 06:08 PM posted to sci.space.history
Eric Chomko[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,853
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

On Mar 24, 12:18*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 22, 9:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote:





When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this
fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all
probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions.
This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed
remnants. * Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on
display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! * *We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the
open minded, the more evidence the merrier....


On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said
Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary
Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC).


Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's
sightseeing abilities should set the record straight.
Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship


VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration
Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018.


LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That
includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch
down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent
Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC
see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson
told SPACE.com.


"We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages
sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the
overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve
such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see
the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said.


Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky,
LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the
Moon's crater-pocked terrain.


Heading "Down Memory Lane"
Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html


Where's Venus hiding within Apollo missions 11, 14 and 16?

Why are all the public simulators forbidden to include Venus as
otherwise easily seen from our physically dark moon?



Brad you're as bad as those cheezy Sci-Fi films that made all objects
in space seem close to one another, so as to make space travel appear
like terrestial travel. The moon, even if it were in between the earth
and Venus and the earth were at inferior conjunction with the Venus;
the moon would still 99 times as far away from Venus as it is Earth.

Do you actually believe that the numbers of 260,000 miles as an
approximate lunar distance and the inferior conjunction distance of
Earth and Venus as 26,000,000 miles is some sort of CIA/MI5 ruse?
These numbers are approximate for calculation purposes, but they
clearly are accurate with a few percentage points and make the 1/100
ratio of moon distance/Venus distance to the earth accurate.

Why would astronauts see Venus any better from the moon as we do other
than the atmospere?
  #13  
Old March 24th 08, 07:29 PM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions



Eric Chomko wrote:
On Mar 24, 12:18�pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 22, 9:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote:





When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this
fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all
probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions.
This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed
remnants. � Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on
display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! � �We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the
open minded, the more evidence the merrier....


On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said
Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary
Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC).


Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's
sightseeing abilities should set the record straight.
Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship


VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration
Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018.


LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That
includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch
down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent
Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC
see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson
told SPACE.com.


"We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages
sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the
overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve
such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see
the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said.


Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky,
LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the
Moon's crater-pocked terrain.


Heading "Down Memory Lane"
Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html


Where's Venus hiding within Apollo missions 11, 14 and 16?

Why are all the public simulators forbidden to include Venus as
otherwise easily seen from our physically dark moon?


Brad you're as bad as those cheezy Sci-Fi films that made all objects
in space seem close to one another, so as to make space travel appear
like terrestial travel.


What's "cheezy Sci-Fi" about the regular laws of physics and the best
available science that's peer replicated outside of NASA?

The moon, even if it were in between the earth
and Venus and the earth were at inferior conjunction with the Venus;
the moon would still 99 times as far away from Venus as it is Earth.

Do you actually believe that the numbers of 260,000 miles as an
approximate lunar distance and the inferior conjunction distance of
Earth and Venus as 26,000,000 miles is some sort of CIA/MI5 ruse?


Lacking in brain food, are we? Is going way out of context the status
quo norm for you?

Where the hell did you come up with that silly "CIA/MI5 ruse" of
yours.


These numbers are approximate for calculation purposes, but they
clearly are accurate with a few percentage points and make the 1/100
ratio of moon distance/Venus distance to the earth accurate.


I agree, that Venus at times gets to within 100X the distance of our
moon, thus you'll get no argument from me.

CIA/MI5 are merely the official MIB in charge of all the cloak and
dagger right stuff of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, of which
includes the smoke and mirrors worth of those NASA/Apollo moon landing
hoax aspects.


Why would astronauts see Venus any better from the moon as we do other
than the atmospere?


How could they have missed something that has got such an impressive
albedo of better than roughly twice that of Earth, and at times being
easily within the same optical lens FOV, along with either including
Earth and/or that of our physically dark moon?

It would have been technically impossible for those unfiltered Kodak
moments to have so entirely missed getting a darn good look-see of
having included Venus, as having clearly recorded such upon that Kodak
film with plenty of DR(dynamic range) to burn, so to speak.
. - Brad Guth

  #14  
Old March 25th 08, 11:25 PM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

Where the heck are all of those perfectly good NASA/Apollo moon
landing hoax topics going? It's as though this Earth is actually
flat, whereas such topics and of their authors along with each and
every one of those 700 boxes of our NASA/Apollo mission data just fell
off the edge.

Perhaps we should take a little reflective quiet time to fully
appreciate upon the recent intellectual and anti-science imposed
gauntlets of this Usenet topic/author stalking and science blockage,
whereas instead of the truth we're seeing forced topic stacking of
such wordy disinformation crapolla so that the general public or media
doesn't get an honest wind or otherwise bother to look deep enough
into this mainstream cesspool of Usenet, as to discover what's really
going down the drain.

It's exactly like the cloak and dagger worth of those NASA Apollo
false or dishonest topics having those key search words of NASA,
Apollo, moon landing and hoax continually included within each and
every one of those phony postings of obviously bogus topics, that
which also include naughty smut and porn related context, as clearly
intended in order to cause automatic filtering of what public schools
ever get to read, as well as to divert the honest research intentions
of others, by way of those hidden or cloak and dagger means that
essentially wash-out or force-purge all previous forms of perfectly
serious related topics out of their Google/NOVA archives, and thus
getting removed from their infowar and otherwise mainstream hype
configured Usenet, so that only the mainstream status quo of topics in
100% support of government and of their faith-based NASA/Apollo side
of this issue remains accessible to the public.

Do yourself a basic favor by simply accomplishing a Google Usenet/
Group search of ' apollo hoax ' or try ' moon landing ' and then use
the "sort by date" feature. It's downright funny, isn't it.

In them good old days of applying this form of government and
theological extremist oversight, or merely orchestrated clownism, as
such this tactic was mainstream swarm like accomplished via witch and
book burnings that achieved their form of mainstream damage-control
trickery of that dark-side era, as well as if need be having put those
of their own kind on a stick for yet another shock and awe worth of a
faith-based PR stunt wasn't overlooked.

BTW, my for-real phone of 253-8576061 and email of bradguth@gmail or
bradguth@yahoo (among others) has always been answered by myself, so
if you're not getting through or you believe that I'm not answering my
phone or otherwise not reading or much less returning your email, it's
simply not the least bit intentionally because of myself, but instead
it's more than likely of those calls or emails of yours have been
getting systematically intercepted, modified and/or diverted by those
in charge, and otherwise skewed by those having the most to lose,
especially if they're not doing their spook and mole like jobs at
keeping the rest of us supposed village idiots snookered and
dumbfounded past the point of no return.

If this bad situation of censorship that's clearly getting worse isn't
exactly of what those global domination Zionists and of their puppet
Hitler warlord (aka partner in crimes against humanity) had in mind,
as having since been replaced by our very own warlord(GW Bush) and of
his born-again faith of brown-nosed minions, then what the hell is?

Seems via those presidential signings and of all those DHS powers of
God has entirely excluded or having banished all others from taking
proper action. Again, it's all very Third Reich and otherwise warlord
and otherwise Old Testament of being Zionist global domination like.

-

Here's another good one for the old status quo gipper of remote Usenet
censorship, and/or of robo-moderation that's oddly not getting the
least bit opposed by way of those in charge of snookering and/or
traumatizing humanity and our frail environment to death. In other
words of my somewhat dyslexic wisdom, it seems that we few good-guys
are the only ones telling it like it is.

m...: (obvious MI5/CIA spook/mole) has this context to offer:
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...0677c2204ec90a
It doesn't matter, rec.photo.digital.* just hashed this out.
You might care to take a look at:
Killing all posts from Google Groups


"Killing all posts from Google Groups" seems all very warm and fuzzy
Hitler or Zionist of yourself, isn't it.

How about your mainstream status quo of faith-based warlords doing
their usual book and witch burnings at the stake again, or at least
good old waterboarding of those that post such obvious spam?

Or how about their PACWEST of ISP backbone data services having
terminated wide areas of dial-up access on behalf of whatever MI5/CIA
is requesting. It's exactly as though those ENRON qualified
executives were hired in order to pull off yet another sweet deal of
packing our hard earned loot into their offshore bank accounts, by way
of forcing dial-up users to go DSL, or else.

Obviously our Usenet contributor "m..." and others of their incest
mutated kind voted for GW Bush and company of brown-nosed clowns and
minions, that would gladly kill off whomever for their next buck.

I would argue on behalf of a basic robo-moderator function that could
just as easily uncover and divert and/or extract such clearly spam
posted crapolla topics to a similar named group, such as merely having
the .spam added on, as in sci.space.policy.spam should work rather
nicely without ever causing total censorship or author banishment
issues.

BTW, the best of our "Top 10 Space Conspiracy Theories" is still the
ongoing NASA/Apollo moon landing hoax of our mutually perpetrated cold-
war for profit and global domination century, yet oddly these topics
of perfectly keen interest are in fact getting robo-purged from
Usenet, replaced with officially posted spam that's bogus as well as
such porn and smut loaded topics only sucks and blows, as clearly
intended by those in charge.

If smart folks as supposedly having all of "the right stuff" had in
fact been upon the moon and having taken all of those thousands of
unfiltered Kodak moments (from that physically dark as coal surface as
well as from orbit), then do tell us where the hell Venus was hiding
as of missions A11, A14 and A16?

Of all the other sorts of gabi40, Clint Eastwood, susi40, susi40001,
susi40006, mirror server, dlcz, kgkgjkgkgkfgk and perhaps countless
other trash or spam topics getting forced into the Usenet stack,
whereas oddly these silly clownish efforts of their mainstream damage-
control do not seem to bother any of those in charge of this or any
other Usenet group. Why is that? (seems rather Zionist, or worse,
doesn't it)

Are these clownish methods of stuffing or force-feeding such topics as
faith-based approved, so as to intentionally block out or displace all
others from the index worth of other legit topics, or is this Usenet
group by group trashing tactic merely of something MI5/CIA approved?

As much the same as our team of cloak and dagger wizards having
terminated the robust portion of ESA'a Venus Express PFS instrument,
it's yet another interesting note about our physically dark and nasty
moon, in that all the supposed better science (far better off than
anything NASA/Apollo or of anything NASA since Apollo) and of
otherwise perfectly fine expertise of the JAXA/Selene mission is still
after all of this on-orbit science is officially sequestered, as
though forced into being taboo/nondisclosure within one of our NASA
space toilets. (perhaps as parked right next to those 700 missing
boxes of their Apollo moon landing hoax missions and of all those
pesky Muslim WMD)

In addition to what little I've discovered, and my having been trying
within my best dyslexic encrypted ways to share this new and improved
science about Venus and our moon for the past 8+ years and counting,
it seems there's lots more to behold about good old Earth that's worth
our knowing and sharing, such as the many interesting discoveries and
subsequent topics within the following link: Archaeology Answers
About Ancient Civilizations Indus River Valley Ancient Maps of the
World Ancient India Civilizations Ancient China Civilization Egypt
Ancient Gods Strange Pictures Dead Men's Secrets Lost Technology and
more...
www.beforeus.com

Other than my having deductively interpreted via honest
observationology as to what looks so perfectly intelligent/artificial
of the Venus tarmac, township/community of large structures, plus the
surrounding infrastructure and of that nearby bridge as looking so
gosh darn rational, I can't be absolutely certain about such other
intelligent life still existing/coexisting on Venus. However, at
least the regular laws of physics and of the best available science
can't possibly exclude such, because even us frail humans along with a
sufficient degree of applied technology could make a go of it,
especially as for representing ETs capable of getting ourselves to/
from Venus would in of itself offer more than sufficient technological
expertise for safely accommodating an extended stay in spite of all
that geothermally forced environment of Venus being so geologically
newish, CO2/S8 vapor hot and otherwise downright nasty from the bottom
up, and otherwise not as we've been informed as being entirely
greenhouse roasted from the top down. The planet Venus has been
losing its core energy at the rate of 20.5 w/m2 (roughly 256 fold
greater than Earth), because Venus is simply geothermally active and
thus hotter than hell.
.. - Brad Guth
  #15  
Old March 26th 08, 02:31 PM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

Mythbustin' the Moon Hoax
"Update: I've been told the episode does not air April 25. The air
date has not been set yet, but I'll make sure I announce it when it
is!"

· # Forreston 17 Mar 2008 at 11:55 am "I wonder if this will ever be
aired. It would be interesting to find out what they prove or
disprove. After seeing the air date change to TBA, I wonder just how
much was a hoax!"

http://www.duggback.com/space/Mythbu...anding_hoaxes/

Unfortunately, this forever ongoing infowar of supposed Apollo moon
landing hoax Mythbustin' doesn't bother to cover several of the most
important and easily peer replicated factors, that'll just as easily
prove our NASA/Apollo wizards never set a human footprint on the
moon. Remember, if they had absolute proof positive on behalf of all
that's NASA/Apollo, as such it would have been mainstream published
along with multiple peer replicated support that's entirely
independent from any sort of NASA or other government loot or
background moderation. Unfortunately, not even Google/NOVA is the
least bit independent.
. - Brad Guth
  #16  
Old March 27th 08, 05:54 PM posted to sci.space.history
Michael Gallagher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 232
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIET missions

On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:17:13 -0500, J Waggoner
wrote:

.... We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked .....


Exactly, so don't get your hopes up.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #17  
Old March 27th 08, 07:04 PM posted to sci.space.history
Eric Chomko[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,853
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

On Mar 27, 12:54*pm, Michael Gallagher wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:17:13 -0500, J Waggoner
wrote:

.... *We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked .....


Exactly, so don't get your hopes up.


But we will have new data so they'll have to explain how it was faked
and maybe a few will actually believe that we landed after the LRO
encounter. Then again there may be that strange phenomenon where a few
believers become doubters but I suspect that that will bew few and far
in between.
  #18  
Old March 27th 08, 08:08 PM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

On Mar 27, 8:54 am, Michael Gallagher wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:17:13 -0500, J Waggoner
wrote:

.... We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked .....


Exactly, so don't get your hopes up.


And you're telling us where and/or how our NASA/Apollo wizards with
all of their "right stuff" managed to hide Venus? (obviously not,
because technically such is impossible)

What's your sorry excuse for the JAXA/Selene mission as having been
made taboo/nondisclosure rated?
.. - Brad Guth
  #19  
Old March 27th 08, 08:10 PM posted to sci.space.history
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

On Mar 27, 10:04 am, Eric Chomko wrote:
On Mar 27, 12:54 pm, Michael Gallagher wrote:

On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:17:13 -0500, J Waggoner
wrote:


.... We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked .....


Exactly, so don't get your hopes up.


But we will have new data so they'll have to explain how it was faked
and maybe a few will actually believe that we landed after the LRO
encounter. Then again there may be that strange phenomenon where a few
believers become doubters but I suspect that that will bew few and far
in between.


Independent interpreted data that's peer replicated outside of your
hocus-pocus NASA isn't a problem, and never has been.
.. - Brad Guth

  #20  
Old March 28th 08, 02:36 AM posted to sci.space.history
Eric Chomko[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,853
Default Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions

On Mar 27, 3:10*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 27, 10:04 am, Eric Chomko wrote:

On Mar 27, 12:54 pm, Michael Gallagher wrote:


On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:17:13 -0500, J Waggoner
wrote:


.... *We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked .....


Exactly, so don't get your hopes up.


But we will have new data so they'll have to explain how it was faked
and maybe a few will actually believe that we landed after the LRO
encounter. Then again there may be that strange phenomenon where a few
believers become doubters but I suspect that that will bew few and far
in between.


Independent interpreted data that's peer replicated outside of your
hocus-pocus NASA isn't a problem, and never has been.



Brad, do you think that the Russians, who have sent numerous probes
and rovers to the moon, would allow the US nemisis to start/continue
with an Apollo ruse without exposing the farce?

What exactly do you want? If JAXA/Selene jibes with LRO, and proves
that we did in fact put 12 white men on the moon, will you then
repent?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS "later that it was all a hoax" [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 4 June 7th 05 01:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.