A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 29th 04, 08:23 AM
Hossein Javadi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

In Quantum mechanics and Relativity have been accepted that field and
mass-energy are two separable items. But Force, Energy and Mass are
equivalent in Theory of CPH. Also in classical physics attractive and
repulsive gravitational force are independence and there is not any
relationship between repulsive gravitational force and the limitation
of speed in universe. In General Relativity gravity replacement by
space-time and gravity is not a fundamental force. But in Theory of
CPH gravity force is a fundamental force and it produces other
fundamental forces. Also repulsive gravitational force and limit of
speed are depending to each other in Theory of CPH. Also universe
expanding and accelerating universe are result able of limitation of
speed in Theory of CPH. So, Dark Energy is result able of the above
equivalence deduction.


For download article please do right click on address, then chive save
Target as… and save it on your pc.

Following are addresses.

Theory of CPH with form DPF
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_th...s/PDFofCPH.pdf

Black Hole with form DPF
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_th...e-explodes.pdf

Dark Energy with form DPF
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_th...ark-energy.pdf

Theory of CPH in Persian language with form DPF
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_th...es/Persian.pdf

Also, articles did upload on following site;

Http://Cph.fateback.com/cph.htm

Sincerely
Hossein Javadi
  #2  
Old January 29th 04, 03:50 PM
Wfoley2
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

1-800-EAT-****
Clear, Dark, Steady Skies!
(And considerate neighbors!!!)


  #3  
Old January 29th 04, 03:50 PM
Wfoley2
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

1-800-EAT-****
Clear, Dark, Steady Skies!
(And considerate neighbors!!!)


  #4  
Old January 29th 04, 03:50 PM
Wfoley2
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

1-800-EAT-****
Clear, Dark, Steady Skies!
(And considerate neighbors!!!)


  #5  
Old January 30th 04, 02:58 AM
Mitch Alsup
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

(Hossein Javadi) wrote in message . com...
Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

In Quantum mechanics and Relativity have been accepted that field and
mass-energy are two separable items.


No, the very basis of reletivity is that:

E = m * c**2

Mass and energy are very intimately related, and when mass gains lots
of kinetic energy (like very close to the speed of light) then it
starts to act like energy (e.g. waves).

But Force, Energy and Mass are
equivalent in Theory of CPH.


Energy and Force equivalent- ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Force exerted over a distance is work, work through time is energy.
Any theory that posits force and energy are hte same is false.

Also in classical physics attractive and
repulsive gravitational force are independence and there is not any
relationship between repulsive gravitational force and the limitation
of speed in universe.


Could you restate this sentence and use words scientists actually
use, so I can try to figure out what is being stated.

In General Relativity gravity replacement by
space-time and gravity is not a fundamental force.


Sort of--gravity is the bending of space time from mass and energy.
A change of this bending will cause gravitational waves to ripple
through space at the speed of light.

But in Theory of
CPH gravity force is a fundamental force and it produces other
fundamental forces.


Is there any evidence backing CPH?
Does CPH make any fundamentally different predictions than GR?
If so, how would one go about trying to measure these differences?

Also repulsive gravitational force and limit of
speed are depending to each other in Theory of CPH.


Sounds quite circular if you ask me.

Also universe
expanding and accelerating universe are result able of limitation of
speed in Theory of CPH. So, Dark Energy is result able of the above
equivalence deduction.


Could you restate this sentence and use words scientists actually
use, so I can try to figure out what is being stated.
  #6  
Old January 30th 04, 02:58 AM
Mitch Alsup
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

(Hossein Javadi) wrote in message . com...
Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

In Quantum mechanics and Relativity have been accepted that field and
mass-energy are two separable items.


No, the very basis of reletivity is that:

E = m * c**2

Mass and energy are very intimately related, and when mass gains lots
of kinetic energy (like very close to the speed of light) then it
starts to act like energy (e.g. waves).

But Force, Energy and Mass are
equivalent in Theory of CPH.


Energy and Force equivalent- ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Force exerted over a distance is work, work through time is energy.
Any theory that posits force and energy are hte same is false.

Also in classical physics attractive and
repulsive gravitational force are independence and there is not any
relationship between repulsive gravitational force and the limitation
of speed in universe.


Could you restate this sentence and use words scientists actually
use, so I can try to figure out what is being stated.

In General Relativity gravity replacement by
space-time and gravity is not a fundamental force.


Sort of--gravity is the bending of space time from mass and energy.
A change of this bending will cause gravitational waves to ripple
through space at the speed of light.

But in Theory of
CPH gravity force is a fundamental force and it produces other
fundamental forces.


Is there any evidence backing CPH?
Does CPH make any fundamentally different predictions than GR?
If so, how would one go about trying to measure these differences?

Also repulsive gravitational force and limit of
speed are depending to each other in Theory of CPH.


Sounds quite circular if you ask me.

Also universe
expanding and accelerating universe are result able of limitation of
speed in Theory of CPH. So, Dark Energy is result able of the above
equivalence deduction.


Could you restate this sentence and use words scientists actually
use, so I can try to figure out what is being stated.
  #7  
Old January 30th 04, 02:58 AM
Mitch Alsup
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

(Hossein Javadi) wrote in message . com...
Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

In Quantum mechanics and Relativity have been accepted that field and
mass-energy are two separable items.


No, the very basis of reletivity is that:

E = m * c**2

Mass and energy are very intimately related, and when mass gains lots
of kinetic energy (like very close to the speed of light) then it
starts to act like energy (e.g. waves).

But Force, Energy and Mass are
equivalent in Theory of CPH.


Energy and Force equivalent- ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Force exerted over a distance is work, work through time is energy.
Any theory that posits force and energy are hte same is false.

Also in classical physics attractive and
repulsive gravitational force are independence and there is not any
relationship between repulsive gravitational force and the limitation
of speed in universe.


Could you restate this sentence and use words scientists actually
use, so I can try to figure out what is being stated.

In General Relativity gravity replacement by
space-time and gravity is not a fundamental force.


Sort of--gravity is the bending of space time from mass and energy.
A change of this bending will cause gravitational waves to ripple
through space at the speed of light.

But in Theory of
CPH gravity force is a fundamental force and it produces other
fundamental forces.


Is there any evidence backing CPH?
Does CPH make any fundamentally different predictions than GR?
If so, how would one go about trying to measure these differences?

Also repulsive gravitational force and limit of
speed are depending to each other in Theory of CPH.


Sounds quite circular if you ask me.

Also universe
expanding and accelerating universe are result able of limitation of
speed in Theory of CPH. So, Dark Energy is result able of the above
equivalence deduction.


Could you restate this sentence and use words scientists actually
use, so I can try to figure out what is being stated.
  #8  
Old January 30th 04, 05:53 AM
Wfoley2
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

I repeat,
1-800-eat-****.
Crank, Crackpot, Quack, etc., etc., etc.
Clear, Dark, Steady Skies!
(And considerate neighbors!!!)


  #9  
Old January 30th 04, 05:53 AM
Wfoley2
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

I repeat,
1-800-eat-****.
Crank, Crackpot, Quack, etc., etc., etc.
Clear, Dark, Steady Skies!
(And considerate neighbors!!!)


  #10  
Old January 30th 04, 05:53 AM
Wfoley2
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

I repeat,
1-800-eat-****.
Crank, Crackpot, Quack, etc., etc., etc.
Clear, Dark, Steady Skies!
(And considerate neighbors!!!)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY GRAVITYMECHANIC2 Astronomy Misc 2 April 30th 04 10:26 PM
PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY GRAVITYMECHANIC2 Astronomy Misc 2 April 23rd 04 06:32 PM
disaster warning Anonymous Astronomy Misc 1 January 23rd 04 09:31 PM
Invention: Action Device To Generate Unidirectional Force. Abhi Astronomy Misc 21 August 14th 03 09:57 PM
PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY GRAVITYMECHANIC2 Astronomy Misc 0 July 20th 03 04:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.