|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification
Perhaps simply excise "(e.g. as is done for random groups data)"? The
less said about random groups, the better :-) Rob -- On Jun 16, 2008, at 7:20 AM, Eric Greisen wrote: Mark Calabretta wrote: On Thu 2008/06/12 14:13:44 -0400, William Pence wrote in a message to: FITSBITS 1. Change the first sentence in section 8.1 from Rather than store world coordinates separately for each datum (e.g. as is done for random groups data), the regular lattice structure of a FITS image offers the possibility of defining rules for computing world coordinates at each point. to Rather than store world coordinates separately for each datum, one may define rules for computing world coordinates at each point. This change is not acceptable to me. The underlying basis of the world coordinate formalism is that the data has a regular structure, unlike random groups for example. Metrics don't come into it, at least not at this level. Regards, Mark _______________________________________________ fitsbits mailing list http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/fitsbits I did not like the former wording since random groups does have a regular lattice with WCS under the same rules as images along with the random parameters which need not have rules. Eric Greisen _______________________________________________ fitsbits mailing list http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/fitsbits |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | William Pence[_2_] | FITS | 0 | June 12th 08 07:13 PM |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | Steve Allen | FITS | 0 | May 30th 08 04:55 AM |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | Jonathan McDowell | FITS | 0 | May 29th 08 04:12 PM |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | Eric Greisen | FITS | 0 | May 29th 08 03:45 PM |
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification | Jonathan McDowell | FITS | 0 | May 29th 08 02:18 AM |