A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 7th 18, 07:15 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,895
Default The Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False

Here is vigorous motion of water in an electric field, obviously able to produce work - e.g. by rotating a waterwheel:

"The Formation of the Floating Water Bridge including electric breakdowns"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17UD1goTFhQ

The work will be done at the expense of:

(A) electric energy.

(B) ambient heat, in violation of the second law of thermodynamics.

(C) Who cares.

The correct answer is obviously (B). Post-truth scientists unanimously consider (C) as the correct answer.

https://bissolijr.files.wordpress.co...ssed.jpg?w=570

Pentcho Valev
Ads
  #2  
Old December 7th 18, 09:24 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,895
Default The Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False

If a catalyst affects the forward and the reverse reactions differently - e..g. accelerates one more than the other - then the second law of thermodynamics is violated. Here the catalyst speeds up the forward but SUPPRESSES the reverse reaction:

https://images.nature.com/m685/natur...mms3500-f1.jpg

Unidirectional suppression of hydrogen oxidation on oxidized platinum clusters
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms3500

A similar violation:

"In 2000, a simple, foundational thermodynamic paradox was proposed: a sealed blackbody cavity contains a diatomic gas and a radiometer whose apposing vane surfaces dissociate and recombine the gas to different degrees (A_2 ⇌ 2A). As a result of differing desorption rates for A and A_2 , there arise between the vane faces permanent pressure and temperature differences, either of which can be harnessed to perform work, in apparent conflict with the second law of thermodynamics. Here we report on the first experimental realization of this paradox, involving the dissociation of low-pressure hydrogen gas on high-temperature refractory metals (tungsten and rhenium) under blackbody cavity conditions. The results, corroborated by other laboratory studies and supported by theory, confirm the paradoxical temperature difference and point to physics beyond the traditional understanding of the second law." https://link.springer.com/article/10...701-014-9781-5

Pentcho Valev
  #3  
Old December 9th 18, 02:02 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,895
Default The Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False

Water rises and then goes down as the capacitor is switched on and off:

Liquid Dielectric Capacitor https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6KAH1JpdPg

Rise in level of liquid dielectric in capacitance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHNmzcYp6JE&t=358s

The system can do mechanical work by regularly lifting floating weights. The work will be done at the expense of ambient heat (clearly not at the expense of electric energy - in the second video this is more than obvious), in violation of the second law of thermodynamics.

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Second Law of Thermodynamics: Both False and Invincible Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 October 4th 18 03:32 PM
Why the False Second Law of Thermodynamics Still Holds Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 November 2nd 17 10:17 AM
Second Law of Thermodynamics: Paradoxical or False? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 5 September 21st 17 02:48 PM
Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 September 17th 16 02:00 PM
THE FALSE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 January 2nd 14 01:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.