|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Request for some astrophotography
A friend of mine decided to buy one of those "get a star named after
you" things from the International Star Registry (This this a rip-off?). Anyhow they have her the star at 11h 10m 52s 37deg 43' 46" in the constallation of Ursa Major. I'm unable to take pictures since I don't have a guided scope. I would very much appreciate it if someone would consider taking some sort of picture of the star and whatever is in the vancinity. It would be a wonderful surprise for her, even if it is just a white dot on a black background I know this is a long shot, but you guys are great here Regards Nigel -- www.myoldcontacts.com - Tell your friends to tell their friends www.sysadmininc.com - Consultancy, Service, Sales, Networking... www.british-expats.com - Connect with British Expats World Wide www.kxez.com/shows_britishinvasion.php - 9-11pm Sunday. KXEZ 92.1 FM "I reject your reality and substitute it with my own" --Adam Savage. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Request for some astrophotography
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:20:01 GMT, Nigel Reed
wrote: A friend of mine decided to buy one of those "get a star named after you" things from the International Star Registry (This this a rip-off?). Anyhow they have her the star at 11h 10m 52s 37deg 43' 46" in the constallation of Ursa Major. I'm unable to take pictures since I don't have a guided scope. I would very much appreciate it if someone would consider taking some sort of picture of the star and whatever is in the vancinity. It would be a wonderful surprise for her, even if it is just a white dot on a black background You can get an image from one of the online catalogs. It appears there is nothing at the coordinates you gave, but who knows what date they are for? ISR probably doesn't bother with that information. There is a 8.5 magnitude star a couple of arcminutes from there, HD97155. Here's an image from the Palomar Sky Survey: http://aladin.u-strasbg.fr/AladinPre...ent=HD%2097155 _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Request for some astrophotography
Many of the stars they sell for names ( yes it IS a scam, totaly worthless )
can't be seen unless you've got the usage of something like the 200 inch hale telescope. -- The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond Telescope Buyers FAQ http://home.inreach.com/starlord Astronomy Net Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/astronomy_net In Garden Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/ingarden Blast Off Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/starlords On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:20:01 GMT, Nigel Reed wrote: A friend of mine decided to buy one of those "get a star named after you" things from the International Star Registry (This this a rip-off?). Anyhow they have her the star at 11h 10m 52s 37deg 43' 46" in the constallation of Ursa Major. I'm unable to take pictures since I don't have a guided scope. I would very much appreciate it if someone would consider taking some sort of picture of the star and whatever is in the vancinity. It would be a wonderful surprise for her, even if it is just a white dot on a black background |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Request for some astrophotography
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:02:48 -0800, "Starlord"
wrote: Many of the stars they sell for names ( yes it IS a scam, totaly worthless ) can't be seen unless you've got the usage of something like the 200 inch hale telescope. I don't know if they are still using the HST Guide Star Catalog as their source- they were for a long time. That catalog is full of errors, including "stars" that are actually film defects. Still, while most are wholly unremarkable, all of the stars are brighter than mag 16, so even the dimmest should be visible in meter class scopes. I guess that the majority of stars "sold" are actually visible with typical amateur apertures, and any could be imaged using an exposure time of less than a minute. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Request for some astrophotography
Chris L Peterson wrote:
Still, while most are wholly unremarkable, all of the stars are brighter than mag 16, so even the dimmest should be visible in meter class scopes. I guess that the majority of stars "sold" are actually visible with typical amateur apertures, and any could be imaged using an exposure time of less than a minute. It's difficult to tell if this star is actually on the star chart I have because the Deg " ' is on a curve. http://cartman.wehostmuds.com/~nigel/starmap.jpg It's the one with a star around it (how appropriate!) Regards Nigel -- www.myoldcontacts.com - Tell your friends to tell their friends www.sysadmininc.com - Consultancy, Service, Sales, Networking... www.british-expats.com - Connect with British Expats World Wide www.kxez.com/shows_britishinvasion.php - 9-11pm Sunday. KXEZ 92.1 FM "I reject your reality and substitute it with my own" --Adam Savage. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Request for some astrophotography
Starlord wrote: Many of the stars they sell for names ( yes it IS a scam, totaly worthless ) can't be seen unless you've got the usage of something like the 200 inch hale telescope. -- Hi Dennis: Well, not exactly. That's going a little far. The stars these outfits sell are still visible in most amateur scopes with ease--if you have the _exact_ coordinates and a good finder chart. If it "required" a 200 inch scope to "see" the stars, that would mean the companies had got down to magnitude 20+. They haven't sold that many yet. As far as "worthless," as I've said before and will say again, "worthless" is in the eye and mind of the beholder. ;-) Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ and _The Urban Astronomer's Guide_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Join the SCT User Mailing List. http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/sct-user See my home page at http://skywatch.brainiac.com/astroland/index.htm for further info For Uncle Rod's Astro Blog See: http://journals.aol.com/rmollise/UncleRodsAstroBlog/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Request for some astrophotography
Hay, I'll sell anyone a Star, and I'll do those scammers one better, my
Stars are in M31! ( Which I own anyway ). (Watch the flames now -- The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond Telescope Buyers FAQ http://home.inreach.com/starlord Astronomy Net Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/astronomy_net In Garden Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/ingarden Blast Off Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/starlords "RMOLLISE" wrote in message ups.com... Starlord wrote: Many of the stars they sell for names ( yes it IS a scam, totaly worthless ) can't be seen unless you've got the usage of something like the 200 inch hale telescope. -- Hi Dennis: Well, not exactly. That's going a little far. The stars these outfits sell are still visible in most amateur scopes with ease--if you have the _exact_ coordinates and a good finder chart. If it "required" a 200 inch scope to "see" the stars, that would mean the companies had got down to magnitude 20+. They haven't sold that many yet. As far as "worthless," as I've said before and will say again, "worthless" is in the eye and mind of the beholder. ;-) Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ and _The Urban Astronomer's Guide_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Join the SCT User Mailing List. http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/sct-user See my home page at http://skywatch.brainiac.com/astroland/index.htm for further info For Uncle Rod's Astro Blog See: http://journals.aol.com/rmollise/UncleRodsAstroBlog/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Request for some astrophotography
Starlord wrote:
Hay, I'll sell anyone a Star, and I'll do those scammers one better, my Stars are in M31! ( Which I own anyway ). Dennis, Don't you have to go there and homestead it to stake a claim? Phil |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Request for some astrophotography
If that guy can sell 1ac plots of the moon, I surly can sell stars from M31.
-- The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond Telescope Buyers FAQ http://home.inreach.com/starlord Astronomy Net Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/astronomy_net In Garden Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/ingarden Blast Off Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/starlords "Phil Wheeler" wrote in message ... Starlord wrote: Hay, I'll sell anyone a Star, and I'll do those scammers one better, my Stars are in M31! ( Which I own anyway ). Dennis, Don't you have to go there and homestead it to stake a claim? Phil |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Request for some astrophotography
Semi-serious question: can the HST or Keck resolve individual stars in
M31? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Meade LX90-LNT or Celestron C8-SGT for DSO Astrophotography ? | Nuno | UK Astronomy | 7 | April 6th 05 08:41 AM |
For Sale: Nikon CoolPix 5000 Astrophotography Setup | Mike Schriber | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 20th 04 01:02 AM |
Digital vs. Film in Astrophotography | Jason Donahue | Amateur Astronomy | 216 | January 5th 04 04:34 PM |
Digital vs. Film in Astrophotography | Jason Donahue | CCD Imaging | 35 | January 5th 04 03:11 PM |
Astrophotography telescope for amateur photographer | brulu | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | August 7th 03 03:54 AM |