|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Scientists think our Solar System is unlikely combo to host life
Well, they talk about all kinds of variables such as the Sun's magnetic
field and the Earth's magnetic field. They mention a lot of stuff that has already been discussed in these forums in the past, such as the requirement that an Earth-like planet have a magnetic field to protect its atmosphere against depletion by stellar winds. They also mention that it would be more likely that a planet more massive than the Earth is more likely to host life than Earth is, which has also been discussed here that Earth is probably at the lowest end of the mass scale for a life-bearing world. They think a more likely combo is a K-class orange dwarf paired with a Super-Earth of 2-3x Earth mass. In about a million years we'll be able to see one of those up close, as Gliese 710 will come to within 1 light-year of us and become our closest stellar neighbour. One interesting thing mentioned is that at birth the Sun was rotating 10 times faster than it is today. Therefore it had much larger magnetic fields and more UV production. Any idea why the Sun slowed down over the years? How did it lose its angular momentum? Yousuf Khan Sun, Earth Are Unlikely Pair to Support Life | Universe Today "Edward Guinan, a professor of astronomy and astrophysics at Villanova University in Pennsylvania, and his collaegues have been studying Sun-like stars as windows into the origin of life on Earth, and as indicators of how likely life is elsewhere in the cosmos. The work has revealed that the Sun rotated more than ten times faster in its youth (over four billion years ago) than today. The faster a star rotates, the harder the magnetic dynamo at its core works, generating a stronger magnetic field, so the young Sun emitted X-rays and ultraviolet radiation up to several hundred times stronger than it does today." http://www.universetoday.com/2009/08...-support-life/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Scientists think our Solar System is unlikely combo to host life
On Aug 10, 3:49*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Well, they talk about all kinds of variables such as the Sun's magnetic field and the Earth's magnetic field. They mention a lot of stuff that has already been discussed in these forums in the past, such as the requirement that an Earth-like planet have a magnetic field to protect its atmosphere against depletion by stellar winds. They also mention that it would be more likely that a planet more massive than the Earth is more likely to host life than Earth is, which has also been discussed here that Earth is probably at the lowest end of the mass scale for a life-bearing world. They think a more likely combo is a K-class orange dwarf paired with a Super-Earth of 2-3x Earth mass. In about a million years we'll be able to see one of those up close, as Gliese 710 will come to within 1 light-year of us and become our closest stellar neighbour. One interesting thing mentioned is that at birth the Sun was rotating 10 times faster than it is today. Therefore it had much larger magnetic fields and more UV production. Any idea why the Sun slowed down over the years? How did it lose its angular momentum? Rotation speed is conserved. Spin can increase but rotation cannot decrease. Mitch Raemsch * * * * Yousuf Khan Sun, Earth Are Unlikely Pair to Support Life | Universe Today "Edward Guinan, a professor of astronomy and astrophysics at Villanova University in Pennsylvania, and his collaegues have been studying Sun-like stars as windows into the origin of life on Earth, and as indicators of how likely life is elsewhere in the cosmos. The work has revealed that the Sun rotated more than ten times faster in its youth (over four billion years ago) than today. The faster a star rotates, the harder the magnetic dynamo at its core works, generating a stronger magnetic field, so the young Sun emitted X-rays and ultraviolet radiation up to several hundred times stronger than it does today."http://www.universetoday.com/2009/08/10/sun-earth-are-unlikely-pair-t... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Scientists think our Solar System is unlikely combo to host life
In article ,
Yousuf Khan writes: One interesting thing mentioned is that at birth the Sun was rotating 10 times faster than it is today. Therefore it had much larger magnetic fields and more UV production. Any idea why the Sun slowed down over the years? How did it lose its angular momentum? One idea that used to be popular was magnetic coupling to an accretion disk. I don't know whether or not this hypothesis is still current. Rotation of solar-type stars shows a negative correlation with age, so there is pretty good evidence it slows down somehow. (Unless more recent observations have changed the picture -- I'm at least a few years out of date on this subject.) -- Help keep our newsgroup healthy; please don't feed the trolls. Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123 Cambridge, MA 02138 USA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Scientists think our Solar System is unlikely combo to host life
Steve Willner wrote:
In article , Yousuf Khan writes: One interesting thing mentioned is that at birth the Sun was rotating 10 times faster than it is today. Therefore it had much larger magnetic fields and more UV production. Any idea why the Sun slowed down over the years? How did it lose its angular momentum? One idea that used to be popular was magnetic coupling to an accretion disk. I don't know whether or not this hypothesis is still current. Rotation of solar-type stars shows a negative correlation with age, so there is pretty good evidence it slows down somehow. (Unless more recent observations have changed the picture -- I'm at least a few years out of date on this subject.) Wouldn't the period of slowdown then have ended pretty much when the accretion disk disappeared? If old stars are slowing down with age, then there must be a friction source within its own solar system. Such things as planets exerting tidal forces on their star? During that time if the planets are slowing down their sun, then they must be gaining energy and getting farther out in their orbits. Yousuf Khan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Scientists think our Solar System is unlikely combo to host life
On Aug 10, 4:49*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Well, they talk about all kinds of variables such as the Sun's magnetic field and the Earth's magnetic field. They mention a lot of stuff that has already been discussed in these forums in the past, such as the requirement that an Earth-like planet have a magnetic field to protect its atmosphere against depletion by stellar winds. They also mention that it would be more likely that a planet more massive than the Earth is more likely to host life than Earth is, which has also been discussed here that Earth is probably at the lowest end of the mass scale for a life-bearing world. They think a more likely combo is a K-class orange dwarf paired with a Super-Earth of 2-3x Earth mass. In about a million years we'll be able to see one of those up close, as Gliese 710 will come to within 1 light-year of us and become our closest stellar neighbour. One interesting thing mentioned is that at birth the Sun was rotating 10 times faster than it is today. Therefore it had much larger magnetic fields and more UV production. Any idea why the Sun slowed down over the years? How did it lose its angular momentum? * * * * Yousuf Khan Sun, Earth Are Unlikely Pair to Support Life | Universe Today "Edward Guinan, a professor of astronomy and astrophysics at Villanova University in Pennsylvania, and his collaegues have been studying Sun-like stars as windows into the origin of life on Earth, and as indicators of how likely life is elsewhere in the cosmos. The work has revealed that the Sun rotated more than ten times faster in its youth (over four billion years ago) than today. The faster a star rotates, the harder the magnetic dynamo at its core works, generating a stronger magnetic field, so the young Sun emitted X-rays and ultraviolet radiation up to several hundred times stronger than it does today."http://www.universetoday.com/2009/08/10/sun-earth-are-unlikely-pair-t... Why are you still excluding the Sirius star/solar system? Are we going to go blind if we look at Sirius A? ~ BG |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Scientists think our Solar System is unlikely combo to host life
On Aug 12, 8:53*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Steve Willner wrote: In article , *Yousuf Khan writes: One interesting thing mentioned is that at birth the Sun was rotating 10 times faster than it is today. Therefore it had much larger magnetic fields and more UV production. Any idea why the Sun slowed down over the years? How did it lose its angular momentum? One idea that used to be popular was magnetic coupling to an accretion disk. *I don't know whether or not this hypothesis is still current. *Rotation of solar-type stars shows a negative correlation with age, so there is pretty good evidence it slows down somehow. (Unless more recent observations have changed the picture -- I'm at least a few years out of date on this subject.) Wouldn't the period of slowdown then have ended pretty much when the accretion disk disappeared? If old stars are slowing down with age, then there must be a friction source within its own solar system. Such things as planets exerting tidal forces on their star? During that time if the planets are slowing down their sun, then they must be gaining energy and getting farther out * in their orbits. * * * * Yousuf Khan It just doesn't add up, does it. ~ BG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Scientists think our Solar System is unlikely combo to host life
SW Rotation of solar-type stars shows a negative correlation
SW with age, In article , Yousuf Khan writes: If old stars are slowing down with age, then there must be a friction source within its own solar system. Yes, of course. The correlation I mentioned holds (or did, last time I heard about it) only for young stars, which might still have disks. But as I wrote before, I'm several years out of date on this, and I expect a lot more is known now. Anybody want to chime in with an update? -- Help keep our newsgroup healthy; please don't feed the trolls. Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123 Cambridge, MA 02138 USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Our scientists never look outside our solar system for other sourcesof light and heat. | Hank Kroll | Astronomy Misc | 3 | March 14th 08 05:34 PM |
Life Elsewhere in Solar System Could Be Different From Life as WeKnow It (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 3 | July 11th 07 03:53 PM |
Life Elsewhere in Solar System Could Be Different From Life as We Know It (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee[_1_] | News | 0 | July 7th 07 04:22 PM |
Scientists Find Possible Birth of Tiniest, Known Solar System | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 30th 05 05:05 PM |
Scientists find possible birth of tiniest known solar system | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 30th 05 04:28 PM |