|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Which do you think would be most cost efficient. 1) Creating a reflective dust cloud round the Earth 2) Placing some kind of umbrella in orbit round the Earth 3) Placing a much smaller umbrella at the stable point between the Earth and Sun. Option 1 would probably continuously need topping up. Option 2 would need to surround the whole Earth to give an effective shield with only that on the Sun facing side working at one time. Rather a hazzard to space flight as well. Option 3 would need more fuel to place in position, but would be much smaller thus might be more efficient. Rand Simberg wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 22:09:11 GMT, in a place far, far away, lid (John Savard) made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: Why, yes, there are. We _can_ tread more gently on the Earth without attempting to curtail human material well-being to an unrealistic extent. There are other ways to produce energy besides the use of fossil fuels. Yes, and as the cost of fossil fuels rises, we will continue to shift over to them more and more. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CEV PDQ | Scott Lowther | History | 829 | June 12th 05 07:17 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 4th 05 04:21 AM |
CRACK THIS CODE!!! WHY DID IT HAPPEN READ THIS DISTRUCTION!!!! | zetasum | History | 0 | February 3rd 05 12:28 AM |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |