|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt29 MECO theory evidence; poor reporting by NOVA on blackhole#384 Atom Totality 4th ed
Chapter 29 MECO theory to explain high energy sources and dispel black- hole theory as science-fiction Subject: NOVA doing science-fiction instead of science "Monster of the Milky Way" Come to eat supper tonight and this NOVA show was on, "Monster of the Milky Way" about black-holes. It had been on several times in years past but I turned it off because, I do not believe any black holes exist and that imagination has just run amok over this topic. I cringe at all the statements as if black holes are foregone conclusions. And that these black-hole theorists can hog the center stage with their fake theory. And hog so that alternative theories that cast huge doubt are never invited to speak out. For instance the recent MECO theory by several astronomers proves no black-holes in that galaxy and that the MECO emits a conical north and south polar vortices the same as what black-holes are conjectured to emit. But all in all, I watched the program even though it was hard going and alot of cringing. But let me point out how weak their argument is. How awfully weak and that they never deserved a hour long NOVA show. Usually these type of shows have at least a 40% or 30% of scientist who cast doubt on what the topic is but in this NOVA it was pure 100% time on those convinced and what I would call deluded black hole theorists. But let me mention the tiny shred of evidence that holds that program together. It was mentioned that if there are stars in a region where it is suspected a black-hole that the star would accelerate in its orbit and be hugely deflected. So they looked in the Sagittarus region of the Milky Way and they found with their adaptive imaging that it looked as though there was a body near Sagittarus that had this huge deflection. And from that shred of evidence we have a huge group of so called scientists ( I call them science-fictionalists) dominating the astronomy with their black hole theory. You see, if someone were to have been placed on that PBS NOVA program to counter that claim would have simply said. Look, take any region of the Milky Way where there are a dense population of stars and you will easily find the same sort of accelerated deflection and where it is ludicrous to think there is a black-hole nearby. So in other words, the meager shred of evidence of acceleration of stars near Sagitarus is nothing special. That the astronomy community fell into a huge logic-hole (sorry for the pun). A logic hole that they were looking for accelerated star near Sagitarus, but then, looking near any other place in the cosmos will get the very same sought for accelerated star. So that logic cannot give those scientists in that program evidence of a black-hole, nor that an accelerated star is just as likely to happen near a MECO. And coupled with the fact that MECO theory has bold evidence that black-holes cannot exist and that if you see a bipolar funnel near a star does not mean it is a black-hole but rather it could be a MECO. So in this entire NOVA show on black-holes is a modern day science propaganda and not a science good program. This used to bother me alot. But I realize that in science, usually the first theories proffered to explain something are usually wrong theories and that the correct and true theories have to take time to oust and remove the fiction theory. Black-holes are a fiction theory but it is alright that they hog the limelight, because in the future, those so called scientists will be laughed at, not congratulated. So we need deluded people to stretch their necks out on preposterous theories like black-holes, whilst the real scientists with MECO slowly and gradually trashcan the delusionists. And it is alright that the MECO theorists get no attention, get no respect, and lie low for years while the delusionists hog away. It is alright, because in the future, it is the delusionists that be studied for "what not to do to be a scientist" Subject: MECO data should have been aired NOVA doing science- fiction instead of science "Monster of the Milky Way" Some at Harvard, and other scientists found MECO's where originally it was thought to be black-holes. They published their work and are now focusing on the Milky Way center to show that there lies a MECO in our galactic center. A MECO is not a black-hole and a MECO does not violate the laws of physics, for which a blackhole violates all the laws of physics. So it is very much preposterous for NOVA to air a full hour of deluded scientists who are fixated on black-holes when MECOs exist and are a better scientific explanation. That entire hour of NOVA rested on a pitiful shred of evidence of Andrea Ghez's alleged being able to unscramble fuzzy dots and noise near our very fuzzy galactic nucleus of a few meager dots that looked to being accelerated. Well, hells bells, I can get the same meager results by looking at almost any binary star system where I can find the one star being accelerated. Sirius A and B are the same setup as Ghez's and McNamara's accelerated stars in the nucleus, so why not say that Sirius A is a black hole. So for NOVA to delete the MECO work done to date in a program filled with nothing but black-hole delusionists is science reporting at its worst. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MECO theory supported by Atom Totality #330 Atom Totality | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 18th 11 08:23 PM |
4th ed. Chapt 15 MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #308 ATOM TOTALITY | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 18th 10 07:24 AM |
Chapt 15 MECO theory replacing black-holes #307 ATOM TOTALITY,ONE-ATOM-UNIVERSE theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 17th 10 05:13 AM |
4th ed. Chapt 15 MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #306 ATOM TOTALITY | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 17th 10 04:52 AM |
MECO theory reinforced by Atom Totality theory #48 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | May 21st 09 07:51 PM |