A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

More Fodder for the 9/11 Conspiracy



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old September 16th 17, 05:20 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,511
Default More Fodder for the 9/11 Conspiracy

"Bast" wrote in message news
snip


*** Just for you, numbnutz (or whatever the femme equivalent is):
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/d...eist?q=Atheist
Perhaps you should pull your noggin out of your butt.
I am an Atheist. There is no God, no Superior being (barring
advanced Alien intelligence) and there are no miracles.
Evolution triumphs over ignorance and superstition.







So you ARE open to the option that there is superior alien intelligence ?
Not from this earth but from the sky, with advanced knowledge and abilities
to perform tasks that seem impossible.

*** With about as many galaxies in the visible sky as there are stars
in the Milk Way, and each of those stars having planets, the chances
of extraterrestrial life are not only likely, but a assured, especially
since
some of the galaxies have a 10 B year head start.

Isn't that the very definition of a GOD ?
*** and NO, a higher intelligence is not synonymous with a godly deity.

And how do you know a ship didn't come to earth years ago, and the occupants
became the gods we speak of today ?

*** That too is very possible. In fact the sudden rise of human
intelligence
could well support such a theory. But science is based on facts, and unlike
your 9/11 theory, which is in its entirety base on the mad ramblings of a
half a brain, the Alien visitor theory to date has no physical proof to
support
it. Unlike the Climate Change voodoo computer models, I'd rather wait for
solid evidence of alien presence, rather than jump on the bandwagon after
watching a mind numbing 5 hour video of some halfwit's wet dream.

Maybe the Von Daniken "Chariots of the Gods" book and followers or the
movie "The gods must be crazy" are on the right track.

*** Could be ... only time will tell

Oh oh....You may not be an athiest after all.

*** There you go again. Life in the Universe is the rule rather than the
exception. We haven't been anywhere yet. The Moon is a wasteland
and there may be microbial life on Mars, but until the little guy with
his hammer gets there to look under the rocks, we just don't know.
But there is no grand master orchestrating the whole shebang from
his throne in the ether, and even if angels with wings, big boobs and
pouty lips do sound appealing, I'll err on the safe and sane side, which
is the opposite of the one you and the noTroll are on.



  #32  
Old September 16th 17, 07:00 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default More Fodder for the 9/11 Conspiracy



Hägar wrote:
"Bast" wrote in message news
snip


*** Just for you, numbnutz (or whatever the femme equivalent is):
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/d...eist?q=Atheist
Perhaps you should pull your noggin out of your butt.
I am an Atheist. There is no God, no Superior being (barring
advanced Alien intelligence) and there are no miracles.
Evolution triumphs over ignorance and superstition.







So you ARE open to the option that there is superior alien intelligence
? Not from this earth but from the sky, with advanced knowledge and
abilities to perform tasks that seem impossible.

*** With about as many galaxies in the visible sky as there are stars
in the Milk Way, and each of those stars having planets, the chances
of extraterrestrial life are not only likely, but a assured, especially
since
some of the galaxies have a 10 B year head start.

Isn't that the very definition of a GOD ?
*** and NO, a higher intelligence is not synonymous with a godly deity.

And how do you know a ship didn't come to earth years ago, and the
occupants became the gods we speak of today ?

*** That too is very possible. In fact the sudden rise of human
intelligence
could well support such a theory. But science is based on facts, and
unlike your 9/11 theory, which is in its entirety base on the mad
ramblings of a half a brain, the Alien visitor theory to date has no
physical proof to support
it. Unlike the Climate Change voodoo computer models, I'd rather wait
for solid evidence of alien presence, rather than jump on the bandwagon
after watching a mind numbing 5 hour video of some halfwit's wet dream.

Maybe the Von Daniken "Chariots of the Gods" book and followers or the
movie "The gods must be crazy" are on the right track.

*** Could be ... only time will tell

Oh oh....You may not be an athiest after all.

*** There you go again. Life in the Universe is the rule rather than the
exception. We haven't been anywhere yet. The Moon is a wasteland
and there may be microbial life on Mars, but until the little guy with
his hammer gets there to look under the rocks, we just don't know.
But there is no grand master orchestrating the whole shebang from
his throne in the ether, and even if angels with wings, big boobs and
pouty lips do sound appealing, I'll err on the safe and sane side, which
is the opposite of the one you and the noTroll are on.








And there you go again reading more into a post than I actually said.
I never said that life was the rule throughout the universe.
However, even you should realize that the basis of ALL religions is that
life on earth is "special' and god(s) made mankind the execption in the
void.

So if as you say you think that life is limited to this blue ball in the
immenseness of the universe, and that each of us is "special".
You are the one that has your own version of religion.


As for me I'll just say life in the universe is a role of the dice.
But if you roll the dice enough times, you are bound to get a similar result
more than once.

Not dismissing the chance that what is called Aliens, may just be an evolved
life form from millennia in the future of earth who did not come from
another planet. only "historians" from another time.
They may not even be human descendants and look very different, as humans
will probably have destroyed themselves by then, and something else took
over at the top of the food chain.

......"Planet of the Hagars" ?,....on that thought I might as well just drink
the bleach now.


  #33  
Old September 16th 17, 05:30 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,511
Default More Fodder for the 9/11 Conspiracy

"Bast" wrote in message news
snip


over at the top of the food chain.

......"Planet of the Hagars" ?,....on that thought I might as well just drink
the bleach now.


Once again you didn't get it. Since I'm tired of arguing with someone

of the "half-a-brain" legacy, I'm throwing in the towel. Stupidity can't be
beat, not even with sound logic. That's why, on any "Planet of the Hagars"
your ilk would be back in the kitchen, or making babies and serving as bar
wenches ... and you certainly would not the right to vote, on anything.
Peace once again ...

  #34  
Old September 17th 17, 04:00 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default More Fodder for the 9/11 Conspiracy



Hägar wrote:
"Bast" wrote in message news
snip


over at the top of the food chain.

....."Planet of the Hagars" ?,....on that thought I might as well just
drink the bleach now.


Once again you didn't get it. Since I'm tired of arguing with
someone

of the "half-a-brain" legacy, I'm throwing in the towel. Stupidity
can't be beat, not even with sound logic. That's why, on any "Planet
of the Hagars" your ilk would be back in the kitchen, or making babies
and serving as bar wenches ... and you certainly would not the right to
vote, on anything. Peace once again ...







Good, Now I can get back to my book.
"WHAT HAPPENED - By Hillary Rotten Clinton"

I actually downloaded a copy from the web. And HELL NO, I didn't pay for it.
Hitlery already stole enough money from us taxpayers.

So far it's hillarious, although I doubt it was meant to be.


  #35  
Old September 17th 17, 04:08 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,511
Default More Fodder for the 9/11 Conspiracy

"Bast" wrote in message news
Hägar wrote:
"Bast" wrote in message news
snip


over at the top of the food chain.

....."Planet of the Hagars" ?,....on that thought I might as well just
drink the bleach now.


Once again you didn't get it. Since I'm tired of arguing with
someone

of the "half-a-brain" legacy, I'm throwing in the towel. Stupidity
can't be beat, not even with sound logic. That's why, on any "Planet
of the Hagars" your ilk would be back in the kitchen, or making babies
and serving as bar wenches ... and you certainly would not the right to
vote, on anything. Peace once again ...




Good, Now I can get back to my book.
"WHAT HAPPENED - By Hillary Rotten Clinton"

I actually downloaded a copy from the web. And HELL NO, I didn't pay for it.
Hitlery already stole enough money from us taxpayers.

So far it's hillarious, although I doubt it was meant to be.


As greedy as the bitch is, I seriously doubt that you found a "free"

version on the Net. Am I surprised you would consider to even read
such drivel ... no. The my "half a brain" made me do it excuse would
come in handy, though.

  #36  
Old September 17th 17, 02:15 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default More Fodder for the 9/11 Conspiracy



Hägar wrote:
"Bast" wrote in message news
Hägar wrote:
"Bast" wrote in message news
snip


over at the top of the food chain.

....."Planet of the Hagars" ?,....on that thought I might as well just
drink the bleach now.


Once again you didn't get it. Since I'm tired of arguing with
someone

of the "half-a-brain" legacy, I'm throwing in the towel. Stupidity
can't be beat, not even with sound logic. That's why, on any "Planet
of the Hagars" your ilk would be back in the kitchen, or making babies
and serving as bar wenches ... and you certainly would not the right to
vote, on anything. Peace once again ...




Good, Now I can get back to my book.
"WHAT HAPPENED - By Hillary Rotten Clinton"

I actually downloaded a copy from the web. And HELL NO, I didn't pay
for it. Hitlery already stole enough money from us taxpayers.

So far it's hillarious, although I doubt it was meant to be.


As greedy as the bitch is, I seriously doubt that you found a "free"

version on the Net. Am I surprised you would consider to even read
such drivel ... no. The my "half a brain" made me do it excuse would
come in handy, though.







Just because you are too af-feared of big brother, doesn't mean the rest of
us don't have plenty of options to find pretty much any content we want for
no additional cost.
We of Kekistan have been opressed by you normies for far too long.
As for why I am reading it.
I want the ammunition to shut down any hitlery supporters who try to say I'm
a Nazi, for wanting to see America be great again.

Besides,....it's a hillary-ious read. I'm sure she even blames sewage
lagoons for her defeat.
And her twisting of the message from "1984" is just beyond belief in irony.

You may just follow the masses of other sheep to form an opinion.
I prefer to know exactly why I might be against or for something, and know
that my own opinion is really my own.


9/11 was still an inside job too.
The apollo mon landings were faked.
There were never any WMD's in the middle east
And Hitlery is one of the biggest bull****ting thieves washington has ever
produced




  #37  
Old October 19th 17, 03:55 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Sarah Ehrett
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 119
Default More Fodder for the 9/11 Conspiracy

On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:34:30 -0400, "Bast"
wrote:



Hägar wrote:
A wet-dream come true for Bast, the resident "L"
queen, who should get her/its jollies over this one:

https://boblivingstonletter.com/aler...-lost-edition/

What they forget to tell you is that:

1) The real GOP haters will insist that GWB is the
dumbest MoFo that ever walked the Earth, was a
drunk and a Coke head, and his daddy bought him
the diplomas from Yale and Harvard. Nobody has
yet explained how such a doofus could successfully
pilot a military fighter jet.


GW Bush flew an F-102 Delta Dagger.

The Convair F-102 Delta Dagger was an American interceptor aircraft
that was built as part of the backbone of the United States Air
Force's air defenses in the late 1950s. Entering service in 1956,
**its main purpose was to intercept invading Soviet strategic bomber
fleets during the Cold War.** Designed and manufactured by Convair,
1,000 F-102s were built.

** A hint to Bast and all the other kooks as to why GW Bush didn't fly
in Vietnam. He was part of the home defense.

Who saying Bushie could fly a jet ???


The United States Air Force.


snip remainder Bast kook spew
  #38  
Old October 19th 17, 03:55 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Sarah Ehrett
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 119
Default More Fodder for the 9/11 Conspiracy

On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 18:46:06 -0700, Hägar wrote:

"palsing" wrote in message
...

On Monday, September 11, 2017 at 11:33:33 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote:

Who saying Bushie could fly a jet ???


Lots and lots of people. This is really not up for debate...

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/...h-record_x.htm

http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...ard-byron-york

"Bush joined in May 1968. He went through six weeks of basic training–a
full-time job–at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Tex. Then he
underwent 53 weeks of flight training–again, full time–at Moody Air Force
Base in Valdosta, Ga. Then he underwent 21 weeks of fighter interceptor
training–full time–at Ellington Air Force Base in Houston. Counting other,
shorter, postings in between, by the end of his training period Bush had
served two years on active duty. Certified to fly the F-102 fighter plane,
Bush then began a period of frequent–usually weekly–flying. The F-102 was
designed to shoot down other fighter planes, and the missions Bush flew were
training flights, mostly over the Gulf of Mexico and often at night, in
which pilots took turns being the predator and the prey.”If you’re going to
practice how to shoot down another airplane, then you have to have another
airplane up there to work on,” recalls retired Col. William Campenni, who
flew with Bush in 1970 and 1971. “He’d be the target for the first half of
the mission, and then we’d switch.” During that period Bush’s superiors gave
him consistently high ratings as a pilot. “Lt. Bush is an exceptional
fighter interceptor pilot and officer,” wrote one in a 1972 evaluation.
Another evaluation, in 1971, called Bush “an exceptionally fine young
officer and pilot” who “continually flies intercept missions with the unit
to increase his proficiency even further.” And a third rating, in 1970, said
Bush “clearly stands out as a top notch fighter interceptor pilot” and was
also “a natural leader whom his contemporaries look to for leadership.”


*** I have, to some degree or other, brought all of these facts
to the attention of the Nay-Sayers. It seems they are very much
confused by facts that everyone can look up and confirm and
would sink their narrative like a leaky boat.


Ok but then there is Bast who is just outright bat **** crazy.


Their unbridled
hatred for George Bush and equal disdain for Dick Cheney
probably has to do with their wealth and independence.
Bush could demonstrate walking on water and he would
still be crucified as Satan by these narrow minded windbags
of Liberal origin.


  #39  
Old October 19th 17, 02:43 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default More Fodder for the 9/11 Conspiracy



Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:34:30 -0400, "Bast"
wrote:



Hägar wrote:
A wet-dream come true for Bast, the resident "L"
queen, who should get her/its jollies over this one:

https://boblivingstonletter.com/aler...-lost-edition/

What they forget to tell you is that:

1) The real GOP haters will insist that GWB is the
dumbest MoFo that ever walked the Earth, was a
drunk and a Coke head, and his daddy bought him
the diplomas from Yale and Harvard. Nobody has
yet explained how such a doofus could successfully
pilot a military fighter jet.


GW Bush flew an F-102 Delta Dagger.

The Convair F-102 Delta Dagger was an American interceptor aircraft
that was built as part of the backbone of the United States Air
Force's air defenses in the late 1950s. Entering service in 1956,
**its main purpose was to intercept invading Soviet strategic bomber
fleets during the Cold War.** Designed and manufactured by Convair,
1,000 F-102s were built.

** A hint to Bast and all the other kooks as to why GW Bush didn't fly
in Vietnam. He was part of the home defense.

Who saying Bushie could fly a jet ???


The United States Air Force.





Oh,.....you mean the same people who claim they couldn't stop planes from
crashng into the towers and then an hour later into the Pentagon ????
Bush Money, buys a lot of bull****.


  #40  
Old October 19th 17, 03:14 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Sarah Ehrett
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 119
Default More Fodder for the 9/11 Conspiracy

On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:43:28 -0400, "Bast"
wrote:



Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:34:30 -0400, "Bast"
wrote:



Hägar wrote:
A wet-dream come true for Bast, the resident "L"
queen, who should get her/its jollies over this one:

https://boblivingstonletter.com/aler...-lost-edition/

What they forget to tell you is that:

1) The real GOP haters will insist that GWB is the
dumbest MoFo that ever walked the Earth, was a
drunk and a Coke head, and his daddy bought him
the diplomas from Yale and Harvard. Nobody has
yet explained how such a doofus could successfully
pilot a military fighter jet.


GW Bush flew an F-102 Delta Dagger.

The Convair F-102 Delta Dagger was an American interceptor aircraft
that was built as part of the backbone of the United States Air
Force's air defenses in the late 1950s. Entering service in 1956,
**its main purpose was to intercept invading Soviet strategic bomber
fleets during the Cold War.** Designed and manufactured by Convair,
1,000 F-102s were built.

** A hint to Bast and all the other kooks as to why GW Bush didn't fly
in Vietnam. He was part of the home defense.

Who saying Bushie could fly a jet ???


The United States Air Force.





Oh,.....you mean the same people who claim they couldn't stop planes from
crashng into the towers and then an hour later into the Pentagon ????


Your mental illness aside, GW Bush trained and was a very skilled
pilot of an F-102 aircraft. You've been told this many many times
and people have provided you with verifiable links confirming Bush's
military service.

Only you know why you insist on acting like an idiot on Usenet.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More Fodder for the Global Warming weenies ... Hägar Misc 3 February 10th 15 03:35 PM
Fantasy Fodder for the Goth ... Hägar Misc 2 July 8th 14 01:41 AM
More Fodder for the Enviro-Whackos Brad Guth[_3_] Misc 0 July 23rd 13 02:10 AM
Yet another "Moon Shot" topic fodder question OM History 4 June 22nd 04 08:36 PM
More fodder for Linux/Microsoft debate Richard Amateur Astronomy 20 February 14th 04 06:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.