|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fly away - with the new quickie (tm)
Okay, first - the theme song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAeYTC_uY54 Now, Imagine a 3 m diameter shell that has a surface gravity of 1,000 gees. g = GM/r^2 so M = g*r^2/G G = 6.67e-11 r = 1.5 g =9.8022 * 1,000 therefore M = 330 billion metric tons. Now this shell has an orbital velocity equal to; v = (GM/r)^(1/2) = 121.26 m/sec Which is really very modest Thus, spinning this sphere at this speed converts the sphere into a ring, and reduces the tidal forces along the spin axis of this ring. We end up with a very flat 15 meter diameter ring with a 10 meter diameter hole in the center. The spinning ring consists of a material imbedded with trillions of charged black hole pairs that spin and orbit one another in a way that produces controlled jets of neutrino particles, which impart a thrust to the pair, which is communicated to the atomic matrix in which the black hole dusts are imbedded. The dust particles are 'recharged' with mass by tapping into the zero point energy - taking advantage of the intense Casimir effect between two black holes. In this way, a continuing stream of neutrinos originates throughout the body of the disk flying in all directions at the disk temperature. The charged spinning and orbiting black hole pairs exhibit an external magnetic field and respond to an externally applied magnetic field by aligning with it. When aligned, all the micro-jets of neutrinos are also aligned. So in this way, a propulsive volume exists throughout the spinning disk, controlled by electro magnetic signals sent into the disk. Since the surface gravity of the disk along its spin axis approaches 1,000 gees due to its tremendous mass, it is possible to have an object fall toward the disk as it accelerates and feel no force while doing so due to its small size and tremendous mass. By controlling the distance and accleration rates around this fixed field, objects may be picked up gravitationally or released gravitationally with interaction times of fractions of a second. For example, at 1,000 gees, in 1/100th seconds a disk could move only 1 meter and accelerate to over 350 kph. So, I propose the quickie - a remotely controlle disk only 15 m in diameter that operates at up to 1 million gees. In response to being called by a GPS enabled cell phone, the quickie(tm) arrives and transports you to any point on Earth in less than 3 seconds. (less time than it takes for the transporter sequence to complete on the TV series Star Trek) Basically, quickies circulating above the Earth responding to GPS cell phone signals swoop down and gravitationally attach to the calling party - and waft them to their destination and release them. Attach and release with a static gravity field is easily achieved if distance time and acceleration are finely controlled. At 1 million gees - the entire cosmos is circumnavigated in 23 minutes - ship time. The galaxy is traversed in only a few minutes ship time. Any planet in the solar system may be visited in less than 1 minute. Ship time may be correlated with star time at your destination by navigating appropriately through a time violating region - which likely occur at the center's of many many supermassive black holes at the center of many many galaxies. The question is; if we have this technology at any point in time, where are they? lol. Perhaps if we could receive a signal somehow from the future describing the control protocols, quickies(tm) would flood our skies and allow us to fly away! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fly away - with the new quickie (tm)
Alright, some have asked me how the gravity falls off along the spin
axis of the spinning disk. This would be the gravity produced by an annular disk which is easily computed http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/np...8b385f7e103173 There is a region down the spin axis that rises quadratically with very little tidal force. With a 3 m diameter disk, at 1 million gees surface gravity - gravity falls off to 1 millionth this value in 1 km. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Fly away - with the new quickie (tm)
How the heck do you tap into zero point energy?
By linking up a number of properties in the universe to achieve the end you want. CASIMIR EFFECT - PRESSURE FROM THE VACUUM Consider the Casimir Effect Basically, you put two plates close to one another and there is a pressure created between them by the states excluded between them. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir..._and_wormholes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir...#Vacuum_energy TIDAL FORCE - PRESSURE TO SPIN Now, consider that a pair of spinning objects orbiting one another (like the Earth Moon system) can convert spin into orbital motion via tidal effects between the two bodies. The same is true of black holes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_force Combined with the first process, an external pressure will cause a spin up of the interacting bodies. PENROSE PROCESS - SPIN TO PARTICLES Now, consider that spinning black holes can convert angular momentum to sensible energy via the Pentrose Process. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_process RELATIVISTIC JET - high speed directed neutrino jet. The Penrose Process can produce a relativisitic jet of subatomic particles. The smaller the area of the event horizon, the simpler the particle. For sub-atomic sized black holes, particles are principally neutrinos. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_jet PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER Tiny black holes orbiting one another in an orbit that is smaller than the nucleus of an atom feel a significant Casimir force between them. This force, through tidal action is converted to spin in the black holes. This spin is converted to a jet of relativisitic neutrinos. NEUTRINO ROCKET - TIME DOMAIN MULTIPLEXING In steady state, this neutrino jet occurs only in pairs with no net momentum. A source of hard to detect energy, but not thrust.. However, by causing pairs of black holes to interact a jet from one bh is intercepted by another bh. Bh's may also be made to operate with a specific periodicity - turning their jets on and off in response to conditions. Bh's may be made to orbit one another in a periodic way so as to generate a jet that produces net momentum. Consider two bh's that each have two jets, four jets in all. Each bh singly, does not produce a net thrust, momentum is conserved. Now let's put the two together. There is a left bh, and a right bh. Still no net thrust. The jet from each is directed left or right. So, the left bh has a jet directed left, and one right, which is intercepted by the right bh. The bh on the right also produces two jets, the left jet gets intercepted by the left bh, and the right jet escapes the system. Still no net thrust. Now consider this two bh system operates in such a way that the neutrino jets from each bh operates periodically. The left bh is on for a second and off for a second. And while the left bh is off, the right bh is on, and vice versa. Now for a second the left jet is the only jet leaving the system. A second later, the right jet is the ony jet leaving the system. In the course of two seconds, there is still no net momentum, but within the interval there is an imbalance, like a swing or a pendulum. Now, set the system in rotational motion - so that it orbits with a period of two seconds. Now, the active jet is always pointing in the same direction - producing net thrust. This of course requires engineering several aspects of the bh system - but there is notihing in principle that says this cannot be done. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Once a system of interacting black holes is created it is given a charge and placed in an atomic lattice where it resides. The nucleus of an atom is 1e-15 m in diameter. Schwarschild radius is Rs = 2GM/c^2 1e-15 = 2*6.67e-11*m/9e+16 solving for M M = 674e+9 kg As = 3.1e-30 m2 Planck distance is 1e-35 m M = 6.74e-9 kg As = 3.1e-70 m2 A proton masses 1.6e-27 kg - so both of these are far larger mass than anything on that scale. Furthermore, the number of these objects placed in a crystal lattice are quite small to attain the densities outlined in the first posting. These range from nearly a billion tonnes to a nanogram. ARE THEY STABLE? There is no reason in principle that these systems once set up cannot be as stable as atoms. The amount of energy exchanged, or put out - ripped from the vacum scales with the Hawking radiation they all emit from their surface, though this can be enhanced through the penrose effect to nearly arbitrarily high power levels. T = h-bar * c^3 / (8 pi GM k) h-bar = 1.05e-34 J s c = 3e8 m/s pi = 3.14159 G = 6.67e-11 m3/(kg s2) k = 1.38e-23 J/K = 122.54e+21/M P = A*sigma*T^4 sigma = 5.67e-8 J/s/m2/K4 Fermi sized 1e-15 m M = 674e+9 kg As = 3.1e-30 m2 P = 5.57e-8* 3.1e-30* (122.54e+21/6.74e+11)^4 = 188.6 MW Which produces 1/2 Newton against a half billion tonnes. The radiation isn't doing much! Planck distance is 1e-35 m M = 6.74e-9 kg As = 3.1e-70 m2 P = 5.57e-8 *3.1e-70*(122.54e+21/6.74e-9)^4 = 1.88e+188 Watts At 300 MW per Newton - this is an unbelievable amount of force - that would tear anything apart. Clearly, between the planck scale and the fermi-scale - there is an engineering scale of black hole that is suitable for our purposes. at the 10^-18 meters to 10^-20 meters. the 100,000 tonne to 1,000 tonne range, that produces a 100 billion newtons to 1 trillion newtons of force - sufficient to accelerate the system at 1,000 gees to 100,000 gees. With bulk densities of 100 billion tonnes per cubic meter this requires 1 million to 100 million bh systems per cubic meter to create the sorts of systems described above. If these systems are made from iron-56 compressed by relativistic collision of shaped pieces each requires a block of iron ranging from 5 meters to 25 meters in size. Creating enough engineered bh systems to produce the disk described above requires a lump of pure iron-56 approximately 3 km across. Extractomg emergy through the Penrose Process in the form of additional black holes allows the system to self replicate once a system that taps the zero point energy is operational, vastly reducing their cost, and increasing their number. .. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
astro: M33 quickie | John N. Gretchen III | Astro Pictures | 1 | August 2nd 08 11:59 AM |
ASTRO: a quickie M51 from the backyard last night | Richard Crisp[_1_] | Astro Pictures | 7 | April 13th 08 04:07 PM |
Observing - A quickie report on tonight. | Mark Smith | Amateur Astronomy | 20 | May 31st 04 11:18 PM |
Obs report, 1 Sep 2003: A Labor Day quickie | Brian L. Rachford | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 2nd 03 08:20 AM |