|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Venus for dummies (1.0) / Brad Guth (GuthVenus)
On Feb 20, 4:48*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Feb 20, 2:59*pm, Brad Guth wrote: Be my guest and apply your very own photographic enlargement software, as to viewing this one small but rather interesting area of Venus, using your independent deductive expertise as to enlarge or magnify this mountainous area of Venus that I’ve focused upon, shouldn’t be asking too much. *Most of modern PhotoZoom and other photographic software variations tend to accomplish this enlargement process automatically (including iPhone and Safari), although some extra filtering and dynamic range compensations can further improve on the end result (no direct pixel modifications are ever necessary). “GuthVenus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in question: *https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...Guth#slideshow... *http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif *https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...8634/BradGuth# *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”, GuthVenus What part of looking critically at the surface of Venus is upsetting to you? Too bad the nearby planet Venus is always so taboo/non-disclosure rated. Earth From Space / NOVA According to the latest science capability as having been reported to us via NOVA, of looking at a given planet from space (via satellite), extracting one inch radar resolution as to terrestrial ocean surface levels and thereby interpreting its hidden terrain (far below sea level), while an even more advanced Canadian satellite imaging via radar accomplishes better than a quarter inch resolution mapping above sea level, are each state of the art forms of remote imaging science that we can take to the observationology bank.http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/space/e...rom-space.html This new and improved imaging capability means that a modern satellite mission of “Magellan 2.0” should nowadays be capable of accomplishing at least as good as 25 mm radar mapping resolution of Venus, and accomplishing this without our having to reinvent a damn thing. Of course you’d still have to be smart enough as to interpreting radar derivative composites of the given terrain, as hopefully differentiating between any potentially artificial or unnatural attributes as opposed to whatever should be perfectly natural, because without some deductive interpretation skill is where nothing remote imaged via camera, radar, laser altimeters or even by the naked eye can ever be trusted to interpret as artificial or natural. *In other words, without basic image interpreting skills, might as well hire the blind to deal with all of our science observationology issues. This is where all of my critics come off as being extra special, all- knowing and first-hand expertise at absolutely everything, which of course they are in fact capable of delivering nothing of the kind. Instead they impose FUD and maintain absolute authority over the rest of us, because that’s their real job. In this instance of a NOVA public media production, I can only support and applaud those of the NOVA team and their combined investigative scientific efforts on behalf of further educating the rest of us about the global energy balance and its subsequent diversity of a highly complex environment forced upon our planet, that which probably can not manage as for sustaining 7+ billion humans without its solar influx plus constant internal resupply of minerals, microbes and diatoms to go along with the mostly passive solar influx, not to mention tidal issues along with all the other secondary/recoil influx of everything from IR to gamma that’s coming off our naked moon that is also modulating our entire planet at least twice more so than is the tidal forces of our sun. Of course using a composite rigid airship as a shuttle like probe of such extended exploratory capability hosting our science instruments, as safely and efficiently cruising below those acidic clouds (perhaps as well as for using others of somewhat conventional balloon/blimp configured as capable of easily getting their science payloads above them clouds), as such should not be banished or otherwise excluded from this ongoing need of our exploiting such extreme off-world locations, like Venus which offers us so much in mineral and/or raw element diversity. The vast majority of this new and improved imaging science is of course public funded, and even televised production from NOVA is mostly public funded as well as otherwise indirectly commercially funded via Google and those higher prices that we get to pay for various goods and services. *This kind of science infomercial production doesn’t come cheap, not to mention the national broadcasting service itself isn’t without public and/or consumer added cost issues, that this and the next generation always get to pay for. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”,GuthVenus “GuthVenus” at 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in question:https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...Guth#slideshow... http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...8634/BradGuth# At some near point in time (especially as a very resource demanding global population exceeds 10 billion), our terrestrial resources are going to become too bloody and otherwise too spendy for most of us. Of course oligarchs could care less because, they actually get richer and more powerful with global inflation and proxy wars. In case some of you know-it-all pucks missed the fundamental pretext or concept as represented by this topic; to further clarify it’s not about how to topic/author stalk in order to systematically fail this topic from the very get go, nor is this about how to selectively obfuscate and intentionally do everything conceivably wrong on purpose, just so that you get to brag to yourself and others of your kind that are equally FUD and oligarch capable of proving that only failure, doom and gloom is but the one and only option regardless of the intended path and motivation of what this topic has to offer those few of us willing to conceive of future opportunities, whereas instead of our having to constantly dwell and/or focus only upon each and every conceivable negative that most any moron can just as easily elaborate upon, as we few intelligent folks can elect to look forward and consider the value of the positive/constructive attributes instead of focusing only upon the doom and gloom. For those that wish only to promote the utmost FUD of naysay constrictive and/or doom and gloom worthy outcomes, you can go right ahead and create as many of those silly topics as you like, and you can even pretend that anyone other than yourself actually gives a tinkers damn. Meanwhile, the extremely nearby planet Venus should offer more obtainable value and greater bang for the buck than all the other planets and moons of our solar system combined, especially since our NASA is not willing to help anyone get back on our supposedly inert and monochromatic moon, or even to utilize its L1. So, imagine that we have full access to the very best terrestrial science, technology and materials (as mostly having been public-funded thus far) for assisting in our quest of adapting ourselves and otherwise as much as possible terraforming Venus to suit our future needs, as well as best suited for even sustaining life as we know it right here on Earth. With added resources, our planet can manage to survive with 10+ billion humans, regardless of the GW and/or AGW issues. Of course we could also be utilizing our moon if it wasn’t for the mutually perpetrated cold-war era making it so taboo/nondisclosure rated. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Venus for dummies (1.0) / Brad Guth (GuthVenus) | Brad Guth[_3_] | Policy | 0 | February 21st 13 03:21 PM |
Venus for dummies (1.0) / Brad Guth (GuthVenus) | Brad Guth[_3_] | Policy | 2 | February 9th 13 02:24 PM |
Venus for dummies (1.0) / Brad Guth (GuthVenus) | Brad Guth[_3_] | History | 2 | February 9th 13 02:24 PM |
Venus for dummies (1.0) / Brad Guth (GuthVenus) | Brad Guth[_3_] | Policy | 1 | January 27th 13 02:55 PM |
Venus for dummies (6.0) / Brad Guth (GuthVenus) | Sylvia Else | Policy | 10 | October 10th 12 03:24 PM |