|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
NASA, SpaceX Set First Dragon Launch To ISS
On Dec 25, 3:41*pm, Alan Erskine wrote:
On 25/12/2011 1:11 PM, Matt Wiser wrote: It'll survive. No question. Now, you may now go back to your fantasy world. You keep wailing about something that is irrevelant to HSF. There's a few like you over on sci.military.naval and rec.aviation.military who do the same thing: wail about topics not relevant to what's being discussed. Or they're living in their fantasy world and not bothering to take into account the fact that the policy or procurement suggestions they offer have two chances of being put forward by either Congress or POTUS: Slim and none. The stuff you keep pushing has zero chance of being adopted, so why do you keep pressing for it? Hoping that lightning will strike twice? Said it befo NO BUCK ROGERS, NO BUCKS. Cut and dry, that is it. I think Bob's been really quite good lately. *It can be said you are also in a fantasy world of your own - it depends on perspective. As for HSF being just for NASA, I doubt they will get anywhere with SLS/Orion. *I firmly believe that Dragon and Dreamchaser will be the transport of choice until Stratolaunch (combined with Dreamchaser?) get into gear. *Then, costs _will_ be less than 10% of current LVs. I agree that HSF will survive, but will not use NASA/government-specific systems for much longer. *NASA's budget might stay the same, but don't forget they do research into all sorts of other things; aviation, space and other areas. Clearly, they do, and have done wonders in those fields. But, and this is the key he SLS and Orion are for BEO. The other stuff you mention is for LEO. Alan, in case you haven't heard, there's only ONE Congresscritter pushing EELV and depot-based strategies for BEO, and that's Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA). As I've pointed out earlier, his motives are not completely pu several Commercial Space outfits have facilities in SoCal, and either have facilities in his district, or there's employees of those firms who do live there. (Hawthorne is part of his district). Musk made a lot of enemies back in the Augustine hearings by daring NASA to buy his stuff exclusively-and some of those enemies are in Congress. And remember that the key Senators and Congressmen who make the legislation for NASA are from "space states." Either you convince them that EELV/depots are the way to go or you don't. So far, nobody's convinced them. Good luck trying. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
NASA, SpaceX Set First Dragon Launch To ISS
On 26/12/2011 5:39 PM, Matt Wiser wrote:
Clearly, they do, and have done wonders in those fields. But, and this is the key he SLS and Orion are for BEO. The other stuff you mention is for LEO. Doesn't have to be just LEO - Dragon is designed for re-entry at Martian velocities, not just Lunar or LEO. My idea of a 55 tonne LV is right in the range of Falcon Heavy - Lunar is easy. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
NASA, SpaceX Set First Dragon Launch To ISS
Boobert, you're either in a fantasy world or are a Luddite, and/or pessimist. No use for any of the above. You're clearly upset that Congress isn't listening to you. Like I said, they'd give you a good laugh, then kick you in the ass while on the way out the committee room door congress doesnt listen to anyone but the wealthy who pay for their re elections..... if overspending isnt fixed, we will see hyper inflation and no country will loan us money. thats already started. oh well when your government benies get cut, you were warned. our country is driving a car wth gas pedal floored down a dead end street. the smash up is guaranteed, unless overspending is stopped. with entitlements such a large part of the budget things like medicare and SS will have to be cut too. it will be hard to sell anything space as SS is cut....... feel free to continue living in your dreamland fantasy that everythings great and will continue as is.. but dont come complaining when things collapse |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
NASA, SpaceX Set First Dragon Launch To ISS
On Dec 26, 1:23*am, Alan Erskine wrote:
On 26/12/2011 5:39 PM, Matt Wiser wrote: Clearly, they do, and have done wonders in those fields. But, and this is the key he SLS and Orion are for BEO. The other stuff you mention is for LEO. Doesn't have to be just LEO - Dragon is designed for re-entry at Martian velocities, not just Lunar or LEO. *My idea of a 55 tonne LV is right in the range of Falcon Heavy - Lunar is easy. True, but remember back during Augustine? Musk made a few comments that practically meant that "NASA should buy my products exclusively," or words to that effect. He made a lot of enemies as a result. Not to mention that he's admitted that Space X only has 1% of the lobbying power that Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, Northrop-Grumman, or ULA have. He may get the cargo contract, but crew? I'd wager on Boeing and Orbital Science. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
NASA, SpaceX Set First Dragon Launch To ISS
"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message ... bob haller wrote: Has anyone asked them? Is there any record of anyone saying they _don't_ want Human Space Flight to continue? almost 100% of all republican presenditial candidates, pledged during a republican debate Quote them and list them by name. Yeah, I thought not... The Republican presidential field sent a clear message to NASA workers in America: They don't see a federal role in funding human space flight, [video clip at 6:50 to 9:28]. Debate moderator John King of CNN asked the other six candidates in attendance whether they would continue federal funding for human space flight. Not a single candidate - Texas Rep. Ron Paul, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum and former Godfather's Pizza CEO Herman Cain - raised their hand. Note that they didn't say they wouldn't. Were they asked the question the way YOU insist on putting it and did they all raise their hands to indicate they would not fund it? No, of course not. The unanimous verdict came during a New Hampshire presidential debate tonight and following a scathing assessment of NASA management by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga. GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich says "NASA has become an absolute case study in why bureaucracy cannot innovate," he said. "What we have is bureaucracy after bureaucracy, failure after failure." Want to be that things will pretty much continue on at the current funding levels, give or take, regardless of who wins the White House? -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn I'll take that bet. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
NASA, SpaceX Set First Dragon Launch To ISS
"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message ... bob haller wrote: Boobert, you're either in a fantasy world or are a Luddite, and/or pessimist. No use for any of the above. You're clearly upset that Congress isn't listening to you. Like I said, they'd give you a good laugh, then kick you in the ass while on the way out the committee room door congress doesnt listen to anyone but the wealthy who pay for their re elections..... You really are an ignorant sod, aren't you? Please explain just how "the wealthy" do this, given campaign finance limits. if overspending isnt fixed, we will see hyper inflation and no country will loan us money. thats already started. The sky is falling! THE SKY IS FALLING!!!!!!!! snip sniveling -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is only stupid." -- Heinrich Heine Fred, want to bet the Bobbert is Chicken Little (or was in a previous life)? |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
NASA, SpaceX Set First Dragon Launch To ISS
congress doesnt listen to anyone but the wealthy who pay for their re elections..... You really are an ignorant sod, aren't you? *Please explain just how "the wealthy" do this, given campaign finance limits. the congressmen get groups to do their advertising for them. so as to avoid campagn funding law limits, they do this by promising stuff to these groups..... basically their votes are bought you scratch my back i will scratch yours. this is a major cause of our countries troubles today. it causes gridlock, because no one can compromise, even when its in everyones best interest. now here again is the direct paste from the republican debate. please explain in detail how any of these presidential candidates are supportive of MSF at all? ================================================== =================== The Republican presidential field sent a clear message to NASA workers in America: They don’t see a federal role in funding human space flight, [video clip at 6:50 to 9:28]. Debate moderator John King of CNN asked the other six candidates in attendance whether they would continue federal funding for human space flight. Not a single candidate - Texas Rep. Ron Paul, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum and former Godfather’s Pizza CEO Herman Cain — raised their hand. The unanimous verdict came during a New Hampshire presidential debate tonight and following a scathing assessment of NASA management by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga. GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich says "NASA has become an absolute case study in why bureaucracy cannot innovate,” he said. “What we have is bureaucracy after bureaucracy, failure after failure.” --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
NASA, SpaceX Set First Dragon Launch To ISS
On Dec 28, 3:50*am, bob haller wrote:
congress doesnt listen to anyone but the wealthy who pay for their re elections..... You really are an ignorant sod, aren't you? *Please explain just how "the wealthy" do this, given campaign finance limits. the congressmen get groups to do their advertising for them. so as to avoid campagn funding law limits, they do this by promising stuff to these groups..... basically their votes are bought you scratch my back i will scratch yours. this is a major cause of our countries troubles today. it causes gridlock, because no one can compromise, even when its in everyones best interest. now here again is the direct paste from the republican debate. please explain in detail how any of these presidential candidates are supportive of MSF at all? ================================================== =================== The Republican presidential field sent a clear message to NASA workers in America: They don’t see a federal role in funding human space flight, [video clip at 6:50 to 9:28]. Debate moderator John King of CNN asked the other six candidates in attendance whether they would continue federal funding for human space flight. Not a single candidate - Texas Rep. Ron Paul, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum and former Godfather’s Pizza CEO Herman Cain — raised their hand. The unanimous verdict came during a New Hampshire presidential debate tonight and following a scathing assessment of NASA management by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga. GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich says "NASA has become an absolute case study in why bureaucracy cannot innovate,” he said. “What we have is bureaucracy after bureaucracy, failure after failure.” ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*------------------------ Oh, bobbert, bobbert. Still crying like Chicken Little. Your ignorance of politics is legendary. Need you be reminded that the key members of House and Senate Committees that deal with NASA all come from "Space States", and they decide how much money NASA finally gets, NOT the Administration. Again, you keep living in a fantasy world. Get out of your basement and get into the real one for a change. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
NASA, SpaceX Set First Dragon Launch To ISS
Oh, bobbert, bobbert. Still crying like Chicken Little. Your ignorance of politics is legendary. Need you be reminded that the key members of House and Senate Committees that deal with NASA all come from "Space States", and they decide how much money NASA finally gets, NOT the Administration. Again, you keep living in a fantasy world. Get out of your basement and get into the real one for a change your ignoring the elephants in the room...... the next election will likely see a big turn out of existing congressional reps, they must know its coming given their approval rate of 10% or less. and the fiancial collapse of our country........ those leaders of congress will likely be on the unemployment line....... incidently that was bob schieffers prediction on face the nation last sunday. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
NASA, SpaceX Set First Dragon Launch To ISS
On Dec 28, 3:50*am, bob haller wrote:
congress doesnt listen to anyone but the wealthy who pay for their re elections..... You really are an ignorant sod, aren't you? *Please explain just how "the wealthy" do this, given campaign finance limits. the congressmen get groups to do their advertising for them. so as to avoid campagn funding law limits, they do this by promising stuff to these groups..... basically their votes are bought you scratch my back i will scratch yours. this is a major cause of our countries troubles today. it causes gridlock, because no one can compromise, even when its in everyones best interest. now here again is the direct paste from the republican debate. please explain in detail how any of these presidential candidates are supportive of MSF at all? ================================================== =================== The Republican presidential field sent a clear message to NASA workers in America: They don’t see a federal role in funding human space flight, [video clip at 6:50 to 9:28]. Debate moderator John King of CNN asked the other six candidates in attendance whether they would continue federal funding for human space flight. Not a single candidate - Texas Rep. Ron Paul, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum and former Godfather’s Pizza CEO Herman Cain — raised their hand. The unanimous verdict came during a New Hampshire presidential debate tonight and following a scathing assessment of NASA management by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga. GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich says "NASA has become an absolute case study in why bureaucracy cannot innovate,” he said. “What we have is bureaucracy after bureaucracy, failure after failure.” ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*------------------------ One other thing, boobert: there's a saying among space buffs (which clearly, you're not): "The Meek can have the Earth. The Rest of us are going to the Stars." My bags are packed. So where are you, hmm? Since you're obviously a Luddite, troll, and a Chicken Little, it's obvious. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SpaceX Dragon | Alan Erskine[_3_] | Space Shuttle | 1 | September 6th 11 08:40 AM |
SpaceX orbits Dragon breath? | David Spain | History | 2 | April 22nd 11 01:59 PM |
SpaceX Dragon spacecraft for low cost trips to the Moon. | Mike DiCenso | History | 8 | December 14th 10 10:19 PM |
SpaceX Dragon spacecraft for low cost trips to the Moon. | Robert Clark | History | 7 | December 13th 10 04:05 PM |
SpaceX Dragon | are | Policy | 6 | March 25th 07 12:19 PM |