|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Anomaly Large Cold Spot and an Asymmetry in Temperatures on OppositeHemispheres of the Sky
Please take a look article about Planck data:
http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2...tatistics?lite This graphic highlights anomalies seen in the Planck data. One Anomaly is an Asymmetry in the Average Temperatures on Opposite Hemispheres of the Sky (indicated by the curved line), with slightly higher average temperatures in the southern ecliptic hemisphere and slightly lower average temperatures in the northern ecliptic hemisphere. This runs counter to the mainstream view that the universe should be broadly similar in any direction we look. There Is Also a Cold Spot that Extends Over a Patch of Sky That Is Much Larger Than Expected (Circled). The anomalous regions have been enhanced here to make them more clearly visible. Do you have any ideas of cause of these anomalies? Hannu Poropudas |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Anomaly Large Cold Spot and an Asymmetry in Temperatures onOpposite Hemispheres of the Sky
On Mar 27, 10:15*am, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
Please take a look article about Planck data: http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2...planck-probes-... This graphic highlights anomalies seen in the Planck data. One Anomaly is an Asymmetry in the Average Temperatures on Opposite Hemispheres of the Sky (indicated by the curved line), with slightly higher average temperatures in the southern ecliptic hemisphere and slightly lower average temperatures in the northern ecliptic hemisphere. This runs counter to the mainstream view that the universe should be broadly similar in any direction we look. There Is Also a Cold Spot that Extends Over a Patch of Sky That Is Much Larger Than Expected (Circled). The anomalous regions have been enhanced here to make them more clearly visible. Do you have any ideas of cause of these anomalies? Hannu Poropudas The Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is, a larger version of a black hole polar jet. Dark energy is aether emitted into the Universal jet. It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Anomaly Large Cold Spot and an Asymmetry in Temperatures onOpposite Hemispheres of the Sky
mpc755 wrote:
Do you have any ideas of cause of these anomalies? Hannu Poropudas The Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is, a larger version of a black hole polar jet. Dark energy is aether emitted into the Universal jet. It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing. Or something completely else |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Anomaly Large Cold Spot and an Asymmetry in Temperatures onOpposite Hemispheres of the Sky
On Mar 27, 7:15*am, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
Please take a look article about Planck data: http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2...planck-probes-... This graphic highlights anomalies seen in the Planck data. One Anomaly is an Asymmetry in the Average Temperatures on Opposite Hemispheres of the Sky (indicated by the curved line), with slightly higher average temperatures in the southern ecliptic hemisphere and slightly lower average temperatures in the northern ecliptic hemisphere. This runs counter to the mainstream view that the universe should be broadly similar in any direction we look. There Is Also a Cold Spot that Extends Over a Patch of Sky That Is Much Larger Than Expected (Circled). The anomalous regions have been enhanced here to make them more clearly visible. Do you have any ideas of cause of these anomalies? Hannu Poropudas Exactly, nothing uniform nor otherwise consistent about that map generated via Planck. http://m.static.newsvine.com/servist....jpg&width=600 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Anomaly Large Cold Spot and an Asymmetry in Temperatures on Opposite Hemispheres of the Sky
Hannu Poropudas wrote:
Please take a look article about Planck data: http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2...tatistics?lite This graphic highlights anomalies seen in the Planck data. One Anomaly is an Asymmetry in the Average Temperatures on Opposite Hemispheres of the Sky (indicated by the curved line), with slightly higher average temperatures in the southern ecliptic hemisphere and slightly lower average temperatures in the northern ecliptic hemisphere. This runs counter to the mainstream view that the universe should be broadly similar in any direction we look. There Is Also a Cold Spot that Extends Over a Patch of Sky That Is Much Larger Than Expected (Circled). The anomalous regions have been enhanced here to make them more clearly visible. Do you have any ideas of cause of these anomalies? Hannu Poropudas Interesting. The first thing that comes to mind is that the MBR is assumed to be residual from the Big Bang, which is strictly hypothetical. So MBR may be caused by something else. It is assumed to be greatly redshifted radiation residue from the birth of our universe, but it could also be thermal radiation that permeates the not-so-far-away universe. That the anomalies follow the ecliptic is hardly a coincidence, and it is unlikely to be a feature of the distant past or distant universe, but more probably of our very near surroundings. Then, if this is truly so, the MBR is just MR, with no direct indication that it's redshifted at all, and we'd have to start looking for what causes it, and why it seems related to the ecliptic. I find it hard to believe that the anisotropy matches the ecliptic for no reason. This makes one of the main evidences of the Big Bang, in fact, a contradiction. Likely, new Big Bang models will be built to explain this, but I would try a new approach and start looking for another possible cause for the M(B?)R. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Anomaly Large Cold Spot and an Asymmetry in Temperatures on Opposite Hemispheres of the Sky
"altergnostic" wrote in message ...
Hannu Poropudas wrote: Please take a look article about Planck data: http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2...tatistics?lite This graphic highlights anomalies seen in the Planck data. One Anomaly is an Asymmetry in the Average Temperatures on Opposite Hemispheres of the Sky (indicated by the curved line), with slightly higher average temperatures in the southern ecliptic hemisphere and slightly lower average temperatures in the northern ecliptic hemisphere. This runs counter to the mainstream view that the universe should be broadly similar in any direction we look. There Is Also a Cold Spot that Extends Over a Patch of Sky That Is Much Larger Than Expected (Circled). The anomalous regions have been enhanced here to make them more clearly visible. Do you have any ideas of cause of these anomalies? Hannu Poropudas Interesting. The first thing that comes to mind is that the MBR is assumed to be residual from the Big Bang, which is strictly hypothetical. So MBR may be caused by something else. It is assumed to be greatly redshifted radiation residue from the birth of our universe, but it could also be thermal radiation that permeates the not-so-far-away universe. That the anomalies follow the ecliptic is hardly a coincidence, and it is unlikely to be a feature of the distant past or distant universe, but more probably of our very near surroundings. Then, if this is truly so, the MBR is just MR, with no direct indication that it's redshifted at all, and we'd have to start looking for what causes it, and why it seems related to the ecliptic. I find it hard to believe that the anisotropy matches the ecliptic for no reason. This makes one of the main evidences of the Big Bang, in fact, a contradiction. Likely, new Big Bang models will be built to explain this, but I would try a new approach and start looking for another possible cause for the M(B?)R. ================================================== = A new approach is simple enough. Start with the photon that is analogous to this model: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMCf7SNUb-Q Can you see that the ring gets larger the further it travels? Can you see that this is not the conventional inverse square law? Perhaps what you won't see is the "spin" getting slower. An intelligent man would wonder what that implies. Lower frequency, longer wavelength, red shift, Doppler, oh wow, the universe must be expanding. ********. -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway. When the fools chicken farmer Wilson and Van de faggot present an argument I cannot laugh at I'll retire from usenet. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Anomaly Large Cold Spot and an Asymmetry in Temperatures onOpposite Hemispheres of the Sky
On Mar 27, 10:15*am, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
Please take a look article about Planck data: http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2...planck-probes-... This graphic highlights anomalies seen in the Planck data. One Anomaly is an Asymmetry in the Average Temperatures on Opposite Hemispheres of the Sky (indicated by the curved line), with slightly higher average temperatures in the southern ecliptic hemisphere and slightly lower average temperatures in the northern ecliptic hemisphere. This runs counter to the mainstream view that the universe should be broadly similar in any direction we look. There Is Also a Cold Spot that Extends Over a Patch of Sky That Is Much Larger Than Expected (Circled). The anomalous regions have been enhanced here to make them more clearly visible. Do you have any ideas of cause of these anomalies? Hannu Poropudas xxein: Did you expect our big bang to be homogeneous? It involved a chaos. And a seemingly lopsided one at that. It should be considered that if a highly condensed aggregate of whatever formed (gravity?), it might not be homogeneous due to its own creation. Upon the trigger point of instability and sudden release of energy, presumably from its center, it has inhomogeneous paths to follow outward. Its energy may also cause anything like mass in its way to convert that mass into an energy. A rapid inflation should occur until most all mass sediment is converted. Then a 1/r^2 expansion follows. After that is the commonly known chaos that allows a reformation of an energy to mass in the cooler regions. But for mass to exist, it requires a continual supply of energy to hold its bonds. It gets this from the ambient energy. In so doing, it absorbs any energy that comes by. That changes any equlibrium in the energy field itself. If there was only energy around this mass, it would be riding this energy expansion. But if there were two masses, they would drain the energy between them. For energy to achieve an equilibrium again, it doesn't care where it went. It will still try to maintain its equilibrium. It will draw upon itself to maintain that from all directions. But it also means that it will predominately draw energy along the line vertical between the two masses (using it up) to fill it up again. Not entirely along that line though. It also includes the hemispheres of energy around the two masses. They close in also. And so goes (go) the masses. The point of this that mass rides the ambient energy and we see this with the expansion of this universe. But it rides all energy. Even local as it tries to maintain its equilibrium. Please don't think that our universe was the only one that exists. Just because we cannot see another universe doesn't mean that ours is the only one. Furthering that thought, we see novas and supernovas. Do we know the ingredients for that to happen? Do they release the same kind of energy? Quasars. What is their energy type? Sure we see them but do we see all the energy? Ancient, for sure, but were they formed with a higher form of energy? Do they create new and different universes? If it took light 14 billion years to show us that, what are they like or doing now? Just food for thought. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Asymmetry-Symmetry | jdawe | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 26th 11 09:16 AM |
Cosmic Cold Spot Just a WMAP Data Artifact | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 10 | September 18th 09 11:00 AM |
Asymmetry in Sunrise at Vernal and Autumnal Equinoxes? | W. Watson | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | August 9th 07 08:23 PM |
Asymmetry of the Atlas V | Proponent!!!N0_SP@[email protected] | Technology | 4 | February 10th 06 12:42 AM |
H-alpha picture of Large sun spot | JATO | Solar | 6 | January 30th 05 11:57 AM |