#1
|
|||
|
|||
What emergency...
Is this basket and armoured truck escape supposed to be used for?
Looks a bit risky, and surely the only sort of emergency it could maybe have a place in would be poisonous gas or similar release in the cabin. If the stack got punctured in a tank, or a fire occurred, I'd have thought it would happen far to fast to be able to get out. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What emergency...
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message
.uk... Is this basket and armoured truck escape supposed to be used for? Looks a bit risky, and surely the only sort of emergency it could maybe have a place in would be poisonous gas or similar release in the cabin. If the stack got punctured in a tank, or a fire occurred, I'd have thought it would happen far to fast to be able to get out. Brian Cynically, the emergency it covers is the Congressional hearing after a pad accident and Congress is asking why there wasn't an escape system at the pad. In reality, I think there's probably a few emergencies such as you mention and perhaps a few others (maybe APU fire, OMS/RCS fire of some sort, etc.) that it would be useful for. Saturn had something similar and there's still supposed to be the bomb-proof room built into the concrete pad that the emergency elevator would have dropped them into. -- Greg Moore SQL Server DBA Consulting Remote and Onsite available! Email: sql (at) greenms.com http://www.greenms.com/sqlserver.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What emergency...
On Nov 24, 3:51 am, "Brian Gaff" wrote:
Is this basket and armoured truck escape supposed to be used for? Looks a bit risky, and surely the only sort of emergency it could maybe have a place in would be poisonous gas or similar release in the cabin. If the stack got punctured in a tank, or a fire occurred, I'd have thought it would happen far to fast to be able to get out. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ The system is also for the closeout crew. The astronauts are not the only people at the pad/ There are many uses for it. The comment about the hearings is BS. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What emergency...
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message .uk... I thought so, as I seem to recall many years before any Shuttle flew a system like this was shown over here on TV. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ Maybe this is what you saw. http://youtube.com/watch?v=pLiAwSKkm6k (James Burke demonstrates Apollo Saturn emergency precautions) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What emergency...
"Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote:
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message o.uk... Is this basket and armoured truck escape supposed to be used for? Looks a bit risky, and surely the only sort of emergency it could maybe have a place in would be poisonous gas or similar release in the cabin. If the stack got punctured in a tank, or a fire occurred, I'd have thought it would happen far to fast to be able to get out. Cynically, the emergency it covers is the Congressional hearing after a pad accident and Congress is asking why there wasn't an escape system at the pad. wrote: The comment about the hearings is BS. From one whose life has depended on emergency escape systems useful only during extremely unusual circumstances... (A former submariner.) Nah, the comment about the hearings seems spot on to me. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/ -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What emergency...
On Nov 27, 7:23 am, (Derek Lyons) wrote:
"Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote: The comment about the hearings is BS. From one whose life has depended on emergency escape systems useful only during extremely unusual circumstances... (A former submariner.) Nah, the comment about the hearings seems spot on to me. Incorrect. There has always been alternative method of escaping pads, even before the current environment Mercury-Redstone had a cherry picker Mercury-Atlas had a "passive" elevator Gemini had a slide wire Apollo had a slide wire and a bunker with a slide |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What emergency...
wrote in message
... On Nov 27, 7:23 am, (Derek Lyons) wrote: "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote: The comment about the hearings is BS. From one whose life has depended on emergency escape systems useful only during extremely unusual circumstances... (A former submariner.) Nah, the comment about the hearings seems spot on to me. Incorrect. There has always been alternative method of escaping pads, even before the current environment Mercury-Redstone had a cherry picker Mercury-Atlas had a "passive" elevator Gemini had a slide wire Apollo had a slide wire and a bunker with a slide Umm.. and so? That doesn't refute my statement. The fact of the matter is, the likelihood of those being of any use were practically nil. They were useful in a very narrow set of circumstances. But, they also (not exclusively) serve as a cover in the event of an accident. Look at Apollo 1. If there was ever a case for an emergency evacuation from the capsule level, that was it. However, not only wasn't any evacuation method used, it wasn't even possible. -- Greg Moore SQL Server DBA Consulting Remote and Onsite available! Email: sql (at) greenms.com http://www.greenms.com/sqlserver.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What emergency...
On Nov 27, 9:14 am, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: wrote in message They were useful in a very narrow set of circumstances. There are many circumstances that they are useful for. 1. propellant leak at the pad 2. loss of commanding of the vehicle or GSE 3. fire at the tank farm 4. pending over pressurization of a vessel 5. unsafe cabin atmosphere I could go on. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What emergency...
wrote:
On Nov 27, 7:23 am, (Derek Lyons) wrote: "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote: The comment about the hearings is BS. From one whose life has depended on emergency escape systems useful only during extremely unusual circumstances... (A former submariner.) Nah, the comment about the hearings seems spot on to me. Incorrect. There has always been alternative method of escaping pads, even before the current environment Nobody was debating or denying the existence of the alternative methods. We are discussing their relative and probable usefulness. Do keep up. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/ -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Emergency! Readme! Believe! | David Mitchell | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 24th 07 09:25 AM |
Legislative Emergency | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 8 | October 21st 04 06:18 PM |
Legislative Emergency | Rand Simberg | Policy | 8 | October 21st 04 06:18 PM |
Legislative Emergency | jjrobinson2 | Policy | 3 | October 9th 04 03:55 PM |
'Spirit' Communications Emergency | JimO | Policy | 36 | February 5th 04 12:57 PM |