|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is gravity the killer of dimensions?
Here's a hypothetical. If Superstring theory is right and there are
extra dimensions beyond the 3 space and 1 time dimension, and that those extra dimensions are just rolled up into loops that are probably the size range of the Planck Length, then is it possible that reason we can't access those extra dimensions is because we're stuck by an extra-dimensional and superstrong form of gravity to the surface of a 3-dimensional membrane? Let's pull back a little and look at life on our existing 3-D universe. Although we're supposedly 3-dimensional objects, we mostly just have freedom of movement in only 2 dimensions while on the Earth, because we're stuck to the surface by gravity. We can access the 3rd dimension (height) but only by expending some large-ish amount of energy. If we were out in space, and unhindered by gravity, we'd have freedom of movement in all 3 dimensions. Now if we're not on Earth and instead on some kind of Super-Earth where we weigh more, then we'd have to expend even more energy to access the 3rd dimension. Now let's get even more extreme: if we were on the surface of a white dwarf or a neutron star, then we'd have been crushed down and splattered across its surface into a stain no more than one or two atoms thick! So to access the 3rd dimension would require even more energy, almost an impossible amount of energy, and for all intents and purposes, we'd be 2-dimensional objects on this surface. Then let's get even more extreme, how about if we're approaching a black hole? Here there's no surface to land on and get splattered on, like with the white dwarf or neutron star. Instead as we approach the event horizon, we first get spaghettified into a one-dimensional stream of atoms. Then after we've passed through the event horizon, we approach the center, and we get crushed into a zero-dimensional singularity. So the progression is obvious here, the stronger the gravity, the less dimensions there are. I'm wondering if it also goes the opposite way? Let's say as gravity becomes less and less stronger, that more than 3 dimensions start to open up to us? And I'm wondering if the strange behavior that we have attributed to Dark Matter and Dark Energy are just the behaviour of extra dimensions opening up? Yousuf Khan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is gravity the killer of dimensions?
Yousuf Khan wrote:
Here's a hypothetical. If Superstring theory is right and there are extra dimensions beyond the 3 space and 1 time dimension, and that those extra dimensions are just rolled up into loops that are probably the size range of the Planck Length, then is it possible that reason we can't access those extra dimensions is because we're stuck by an extra-dimensional and superstrong form of gravity to the surface of a 3-dimensional membrane? This obsession with scale kills all decent ideas. Scale itself is a dimension. As you travel up and down it, there is nothing in the good book of all knowledge which says why scale is the way it is or what may be predicted to exist at each scale. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is gravity the killer of dimensions?
On 25/12/2013 11:32 AM, 7 wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote: Here's a hypothetical. If Superstring theory is right and there are extra dimensions beyond the 3 space and 1 time dimension, and that those extra dimensions are just rolled up into loops that are probably the size range of the Planck Length, then is it possible that reason we can't access those extra dimensions is because we're stuck by an extra-dimensional and superstrong form of gravity to the surface of a 3-dimensional membrane? This obsession with scale kills all decent ideas. How's that? Scale itself is a dimension. As you travel up and down it, there is nothing in the good book of all knowledge which says why scale is the way it is or what may be predicted to exist at each scale. There's a lot of physical phenomenon that depend on themselves to determine their final answer. The logarithmic and exponential scales are examples of something that changes with its own self. Yousuf Khan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is gravity the killer of dimensions?
On a sunny day (Wed, 25 Dec 2013 00:13:41 -0500) it happened Yousuf Khan
wrote in : Here's a hypothetical. If Superstring theory is right and there are extra dimensions beyond the 3 space and 1 time dimension, and that those extra dimensions are just rolled up into loops that are probably the size range of the Planck Length, then is it possible that reason we can't access those extra dimensions is because we're stuck by an extra-dimensional and superstrong form of gravity to the surface of a 3-dimensional membrane? You know, I will byte. All the bull**** of string theory, other gravity theories. Let's get practical for a moment. If somebody can create gravity in the lab, also change it, neutralize it (I am aware of Podkletnov's experiments), then we can look a bit deeper. In physics, mathematicians have this habit of claiming things they had nothing to do with. The wheel was invented before Pi was found. We observe some effect in experiments, and to quantify it, and for NO other reason, use math, from that we can do some engineering. The math is ALWAYS incomplete, as it in no way is or can be a complete description of nature, as we do not have the in depth picture of nature, just scratching the surface. So without experiment we _cannot_ go deeper. To turn the world upside down is take the math and make a theory from that, that is not even verifiable, like string theory, and is the mathematical equivalent of having sex with yourself. Nothing comes from it, it is 100% safe, and can take any form you like, nobody will object or can object. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is gravity the killer of dimensions?
On 12/25/13, 4:44 PM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
If somebody can create gravity in the lab, also change it, neutralize it (I am aware of Podkletnov's experiments), then we can look a bit deeper. Ref: Hartle, "Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity", Addison Wesley (2003) "A few properties of the gravitational interaction that help explain when gravity is important can already be seen from the gravitational force law F_grav = G m_1 m_2 / r_12^2 1. Gravity is a universal interaction in Newtonian theory between all mass, and, since E = mc^2, in relativistic gravity between all forms of energy. 2. Gravity is unscreened. There are no negative gravitational charges to cancel positive ones, and therefore it is not possible to shield (screen) the gravitational interaction. Gravity is always attractive. 3. Gravity is a long-range interaction. The Newtonian force law is a 1/r^2 interaction. There is no length scale that sets a range for gravitational interactions as there is for the strong and weak interactions. 4. Gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental interactions acting between individual elementary particles at accessible energy scales. The ratio of the gravitational attraction to the electromagnetic repulsion between two protons separated by a distance r is F_grav G m_p^2 / r^2 G m_p^2 -------- = -------------------- = ------------- ~ 10^-36 F_elec e^2 / (4 pi e_0 r^2) (e^2/4pi e_0) where m_p is the mass of the proton and e is its charge. These four facts explain a great deal about the role gravity plays in physical phenomena. They explain, for example, why, although it is the weakest force, gravity governs the organization of the universe on the largest distance scales of astrophysics and cosmology. These distance scales are far beyond the subatomic ranges of the strong and the weak interactions. Electromagnetic interactions COULD be long range were there any large-scale objects with net electric charge. But the universe is electrically neutral, and electromagnetic forces are so much stronger than gravitational forces that any large-scale net charge is quickly neutralized. Gravity is left to govern the structure of the universe on the largest scales. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is gravity the killer of dimensions?
On 25/12/2013 5:44 PM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Wed, 25 Dec 2013 00:13:41 -0500) it happened Yousuf Khan wrote in : Here's a hypothetical. If Superstring theory is right and there are extra dimensions beyond the 3 space and 1 time dimension, and that those extra dimensions are just rolled up into loops that are probably the size range of the Planck Length, then is it possible that reason we can't access those extra dimensions is because we're stuck by an extra-dimensional and superstrong form of gravity to the surface of a 3-dimensional membrane? You know, I will byte. All the bull**** of string theory, other gravity theories. Let's get practical for a moment. I am suggesting a practical here. Even if Superstring theory cannot survive after they disprove Supersymmetry: that's rapidly happening at the LHC, it's only the upgrade hiatus at the LHC that is still keeping SuSy viable at the moment. They can take a step back, unhook the Super from Superstring and be left with original String theory. Still have predictions of extra dimensions, etc. Let's assume maybe there is something to the extra dimensions part of this theory, even if there is nothing to the extra particles part of this theory. If the number of dimensions are flexible and start to show up as gravity loosens, it might explain why gravity seems stronger even though it is weaker. Some of the particles might be taking extra trips into higher dimensions thus they don't get very far away within the existing three dimensions, thus giving the illusion of Dark Matter holding things together at larger scales; even light takes slightly longer around giving the effect of gravitational lenses. Then at even larger scales, gravity loosens even more, and the opposite effect occurs, and things start to move away faster, thus giving the illusion of Dark Energy. Yousuf Khan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is gravity the killer of dimensions?
Yousuf Khan wrote:
You know, I will byte. All the bull**** of string theory, other gravity theories. Let's get practical for a moment. I am suggesting a practical here. Even if Superstring theory cannot You cannot suggest that. Please suggest something else, idiot. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is gravity the killer of dimensions?
Wizard wrote in news:l9ftoa$c2c$4
@speranza.aioe.org: Yousuf Khan wrote: You know, I will byte. All the bull**** of string theory, other gravity theories. Let's get practical for a moment. I am suggesting a practical here. Even if Superstring theory cannot You cannot suggest that. Please suggest something else, idiot. The moron nymshifting troll (Ditchh at his last name) tries again to be me. It doesn't work. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gravity = mass-gravity + positron-space-gravity #369 Atom Totality4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 13th 11 07:38 AM |
Gravity = mass-gravity + positron-space-gravity; superfluid heliumbehaviour #368 Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 12th 11 08:08 AM |
Gravity = mass-gravity + positron-space-gravity; Ida & Dactyl #367Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 11th 11 08:10 PM |
"Killer Asteroid" Debate Pits Gravity Tractors Against Bombs, Projectiles | nightbat[_1_] | Misc | 3 | March 22nd 07 11:33 PM |
Gravity Parallel Universes added Dimensions,and Membranes | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 50 | February 2nd 06 11:54 PM |