Non Newtonian Propulsion granted

Patent granted for PNN (Non Newtonian Propulsion) in year 2000
http://www.asps.it/pat98.jpg
from www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm , www.asps.it/doni.htm

On 3/01/2020 9:57 am, wrote:
Patent granted for PNN (Non Newtonian Propulsion) in year 2000
http://www.asps.it/pat98.jpg
from www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm , www.asps.it/doni.htm


Farily safe bet that it doesn't work, which would ultimately invalidate
it anyway. The main problem with such patents is that unscrupulous
people can use them to attract investment from those who think that a
patent is more than it is.

Sylvia.

Il giorno domenica 5 gennaio 2020 11:03:25 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 3/01/2020 9:57 am, wrote:
Patent granted for PNN (Non Newtonian Propulsion) in year 2000
http://www.asps.it/pat98.jpg
from www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm , www.asps.it/doni.htm


Farily safe bet that it doesn't work, which would ultimately invalidate
it anyway. The main problem with such patents is that unscrupulous
people can use them to attract investment from those who think that a
patent is more than it is.

Sylvia.

The fact that missiles have not been able to maintain even an outpost on the moon for 50 years gives you no suspicion.
Unfortunately, if the PNN is not financed, the human outposts on the Moon and on Mars will remain a dream

and NASA, ESA and Musk remain with their ridicoulous rockets :-)

http://www.asps.it/nasaesa.htm

On 5/01/2020 9:52 pm, wrote:
Il giorno domenica 5 gennaio 2020 11:03:25 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 3/01/2020 9:57 am, wrote:
Patent granted for PNN (Non Newtonian Propulsion) in year 2000
http://www.asps.it/pat98.jpg
from www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm , www.asps.it/doni.htm


Farily safe bet that it doesn't work, which would ultimately invalidate
it anyway. The main problem with such patents is that unscrupulous
people can use them to attract investment from those who think that a
patent is more than it is.

Sylvia.

The fact that missiles have not been able to maintain even an outpost on the moon for 50 years gives you no suspicion.
Unfortunately, if the PNN is not financed, the human outposts on the Moon and on Mars will remain a dream

and NASA, ESA and Musk remain with their ridicoulous rockets :-)

http://www.asps.it/nasaesa.htm


I don't follow your reasoning there. Rockets are difficult and
expensive, for sure, but that doesn't mean that there has to be
something better.

Sylvia

Il giorno domenica 5 gennaio 2020 13:41:33 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 5/01/2020 9:52 pm, wrote:
Il giorno domenica 5 gennaio 2020 11:03:25 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 3/01/2020 9:57 am, wrote:
Patent granted for PNN (Non Newtonian Propulsion) in year 2000
http://www.asps.it/pat98.jpg
from www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm , www.asps.it/doni.htm


Farily safe bet that it doesn't work, which would ultimately invalidate
it anyway. The main problem with such patents is that unscrupulous
people can use them to attract investment from those who think that a
patent is more than it is.

Sylvia.

The fact that missiles have not been able to maintain even an outpost on the moon for 50 years gives you no suspicion.
Unfortunately, if the PNN is not financed, the human outposts on the Moon and on Mars will remain a dream

and NASA, ESA and Musk remain with their ridicoulous rockets :-)

http://www.asps.it/nasaesa.htm


I don't follow your reasoning there. Rockets are difficult and
expensive, for sure, but that doesn't mean that there has to be
something better.

Sylvia

I hope that you or others who believe in rockets are present when in a fundraising in which we will achieve our goals ... that is NOT THIS

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects...project_build#

we will be able to demonstrate publicly how the principle of action and reaction is violated.

NASA has the kilopower nuclear reactors needed to produce electricity for PNN.
We hope to find an agreement with NASA ... always if they want American human outposts on Mars and not play with robots

Regards

E.Laureti

On 16/01/2020 1:29 am, wrote:
Il giorno domenica 5 gennaio 2020 13:41:33 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 5/01/2020 9:52 pm, wrote:
Il giorno domenica 5 gennaio 2020 11:03:25 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 3/01/2020 9:57 am, wrote:
Patent granted for PNN (Non Newtonian Propulsion) in year 2000
http://www.asps.it/pat98.jpg
from www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm , www.asps.it/doni.htm


Farily safe bet that it doesn't work, which would ultimately invalidate
it anyway. The main problem with such patents is that unscrupulous
people can use them to attract investment from those who think that a
patent is more than it is.

Sylvia.

The fact that missiles have not been able to maintain even an outpost on the moon for 50 years gives you no suspicion.
Unfortunately, if the PNN is not financed, the human outposts on the Moon and on Mars will remain a dream

and NASA, ESA and Musk remain with their ridicoulous rockets :-)

http://www.asps.it/nasaesa.htm


I don't follow your reasoning there. Rockets are difficult and
expensive, for sure, but that doesn't mean that there has to be
something better.

Sylvia

I hope that you or others who believe in rockets are present when in a fundraising in which we will achieve our goals ... that is NOT THIS

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects...project_build#

we will be able to demonstrate publicly how the principle of action and reaction is violated.

AU$ 2,112 pledged of AU$ 5,648,769 goal
6 days to go.

Looks like most people know a scam when they see one.

Sylvia.