|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers
1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers
[ Mathematics / Physics / Engineering ] ________________________________ Definitions What is a PRIME Number ? A PRIME number is a number whose only positive divisors are one and itself. What is a MAGIC SQUARE? A magic square is an arrangement of numbers in a square, such that the numbers in all rows, all columns, and both diagonals sum to the same number. ________________________________ MAGIC SQUARES & PRIME Numbers The secret of PRIME Numbers are embedded within the puzzle known as "MAGIC SQUARES". PRIME Numbers and Magic Squares go hand in hand. PRIME Numbers & The Number '1' PRIME Numbers are the progress of TIME or The Number '1' in the universe. Another definition of "Science" is the comprehension of PRIME Numbers. The Number '1' is like "a seed" and PRIME Numbers is the "tree" that grows or progresses from that seed. The seed and the tree are one and the same. ________________________________ The Comphrehension of the Number '1' IS the study of PRIME Numbers, for the Number '1' is the only number in the universe that is truly "indivisible". Since PRIME Numbers take on the nature of the Number '1', and the Number '1' is the seed of all PRIME Numbers, therefore the Number '1' is PRIME Number. ________________________________ To "divide" a PRIME by "itself" OR by the Number '1', results in a "canceling of itself out" OR the PRIME Number "dissolves into its original state" of "NOTHING" OR . EXAMPLES: 1 / 1 = PI 2 / 1 = PI 2 / 2 = PI 3 / 1 = PI 3 / 3 = PI etc. ________________________________ PRIME Numbers & TIME To count 'TIME' is to count the number of 'coincidences' OR same - time - occurrences of The Number '1'. "To count TIME" IS NOT EQUAL TO "measuring TIME" in "seconds", "minutes", "hours", "days", etc. To measure TIME in "seconds", "minutes", etc. is impossible. THEREFORE "To count TIME" IS to count in (the) PRIME Numbers: 1,2,3,5,7,11,13... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers
Sam Wormley wrote:
wrote: 1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PrimeNumber.html "The number 1 is a special case which is considered neither prime nor composite (Wells 1986, p. 31). Although the number 1 used to be considered a prime (Goldbach 1742; Lehmer 1909; Lehmer 1914; Hardy and Wright 1979, p. 11; Gardner 1984, pp. 86-87; Sloane and Plouffe 1995, p. 33; Hardy 1999, p. 46), it requires special treatment in so many definitions and applications involving primes greater than or equal to 2 that it is usually placed into a class of its own". Yes, one is the loneliest number. Or is that the looniest number. -- The Tsiolkovsky Group : http://www.lifeform.org My Planetary BLOB : http://cosmic.lifeform.org Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:39:45 -0600, wrote:
1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers [ Mathematics / Physics / Engineering ] ________________________________ To "divide" a PRIME by "itself" OR by the Number '1', results in a "canceling of itself out" OR the PRIME Number "dissolves into its original state" of "NOTHING" OR . EXAMPLES: 1 / 1 = PI 2 / 1 = PI 2 / 2 = PI 3 / 1 = PI 3 / 3 = PI etc. WRONG! Please learn to check your work before cross posting it to the world and embarassing yourself. x/x = 1, where x 0. PI = ~3.1415926... Cheers, Larry G. -- Your mind is a terrible thing to waste - TURN OFF YOUR TV! ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers
"Sam Wormley" wrote in message news:e3Crh.355327$1i1.161827@attbi_s72... wrote: 1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PrimeNumber.html "The number 1 is a special case which is considered neither prime nor composite (Wells 1986, p. 31). Although the number 1 used to be considered a prime (Goldbach 1742; Lehmer 1909; Lehmer 1914; Hardy and Wright 1979, p. 11; Gardner 1984, pp. 86-87; Sloane and Plouffe 1995, p. 33; Hardy 1999, p. 46), it requires special treatment in so many definitions and applications involving primes greater than or equal to 2 that it is usually placed into a class of its own". Rember this one? A mathematician, a physicist and an engineer are given an identical problem: Prove that all odd numbers greater than 2 are prime numbers. They proceed: Mathematician: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 is not a prime - counterexample - claim is false. Physicist: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 is an experimental error, 11 is a prime, ... Engineer: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 is a prime, 11 is a prime, ... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers
Larry G. wrote:
WRONG! Please learn to check your work before cross posting it to the world and embarassing yourself. -- Your mind is a terrible thing to waste - TURN OFF YOUR TV! Unfortunately, I think the OP's mind is already wasted. Austin |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers
Sam Wormley wrote:
wrote: 1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PrimeNumber.html "The number 1 is a special case which is considered neither prime nor composite (Wells 1986, p. 31). Although the number 1 used to be considered a prime (Goldbach 1742; Lehmer 1909; Lehmer 1914; Hardy and Wright 1979, p. 11; Gardner 1984, pp. 86-87; Sloane and Plouffe 1995, p. 33; Hardy 1999, p. 46), it requires special treatment in so many definitions and applications involving primes greater than or equal to 2 that it is usually placed into a class of its own". Quite right. I would be happy, though, if instead the pattern on a ruler was followed, so that we could say, freely, that 0 is composite and 1 is prime. And then for the various mathematical definitions, we simply use the term "significant prime" for all prime numbers greater than 1. Incidentally, in some mathematical work the fact that 2 is the only even prime makes it special. Yet, that doesn't seem to make sense, because 3 is the only prime number divisible by 3, 5 is the only prime number divisible by 5, and so on. I finally figured out what *does* make 2 special in this regard. 2 is the only prime number p such that all numbers *not* divisible by p belong to the *same* residue class modulo p. Thus, 2 is the only prime number not of the form 2n+1. Besides 3, there are plenty of prime numbers not of the form 3n+1... all the prime numbers of the form 3n+2. Thus, 2 is not unique because it is the only even prime. 2 is unique because it is the only prime number that is not odd. John Savard |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers
All primes except 2 and 3 are of the form 6n +/- 1 (that is
6n plus or minus 1). - Bill wrote in message ups.com... Sam Wormley wrote: wrote: 1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PrimeNumber.html "The number 1 is a special case which is considered neither prime nor composite (Wells 1986, p. 31). Although the number 1 used to be considered a prime (Goldbach 1742; Lehmer 1909; Lehmer 1914; Hardy and Wright 1979, p. 11; Gardner 1984, pp. 86-87; Sloane and Plouffe 1995, p. 33; Hardy 1999, p. 46), it requires special treatment in so many definitions and applications involving primes greater than or equal to 2 that it is usually placed into a class of its own". Quite right. I would be happy, though, if instead the pattern on a ruler was followed, so that we could say, freely, that 0 is composite and 1 is prime. And then for the various mathematical definitions, we simply use the term "significant prime" for all prime numbers greater than 1. Incidentally, in some mathematical work the fact that 2 is the only even prime makes it special. Yet, that doesn't seem to make sense, because 3 is the only prime number divisible by 3, 5 is the only prime number divisible by 5, and so on. I finally figured out what *does* make 2 special in this regard. 2 is the only prime number p such that all numbers *not* divisible by p belong to the *same* residue class modulo p. Thus, 2 is the only prime number not of the form 2n+1. Besides 3, there are plenty of prime numbers not of the form 3n+1... all the prime numbers of the form 3n+2. Thus, 2 is not unique because it is the only even prime. 2 is unique because it is the only prime number that is not odd. John Savard |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers
In article ,
"S y z y g y" wrote: All primes except 2 and 3 are of the form 6n +/- 1 (that is 6n plus or minus 1). Scarcely surprising, considering that numbers of the forms 6n and 6n +/- 2 are all even, and those of the form 6n +/- 3 are all divisible by 3. -- Odysseus |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Numbers | Fons Rave | Misc | 4 | November 30th 06 08:22 AM |
What Are the Numbers Now? | John Schutkeker | Policy | 9 | March 16th 06 03:55 AM |
What Are the Numbers Now? | Michael Kent | Policy | 0 | March 12th 06 05:12 AM |