A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #921  
Old April 14th 09, 05:23 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
bobd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

Just read this article:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...t-anomaly.html

When will we realise that something is wrong with our understanding of
gravity!!
  #922  
Old April 14th 09, 10:36 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Phil Bouchard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,402
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

doug wrote:

[...]

Beyone that, your "equation" is a mass of meaningless drivel.
You have severe math comprehension problems. Look at this
part of your expression: atan2((r-i)/(r-j),0). This is pretty
funny. I will let you see if you can figure out why.


An inside the sphere equation will result in a similar gravitational
time dilation curve:
http://i420.photobucket.com/albums/p...peb8/gtd-3.png

Whe
Sphere radius = 10
x = radius
y = gravitational time dilation factor

All that is relevant in the picture is the shape of the curve. The
calculations requires triple integral calculus and needs some adjustments.

[...]
  #923  
Old April 14th 09, 02:39 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,129
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote:

[...]

Beyone that, your "equation" is a mass of meaningless drivel.
You have severe math comprehension problems. Look at this
part of your expression: atan2((r-i)/(r-j),0). This is pretty
funny. I will let you see if you can figure out why.



An inside the sphere equation will result in a similar gravitational
time dilation curve:
http://i420.photobucket.com/albums/p...peb8/gtd-3.png

Whe
Sphere radius = 10
x = radius
y = gravitational time dilation factor

All that is relevant in the picture is the shape of the curve.


And the shape of the curve is wrong.

The
calculations requires triple integral calculus and needs some adjustments.

Well no, a single integral works just fine. This is done in freshman
physics classes.

[...]

  #924  
Old April 15th 09, 01:35 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Phil Bouchard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,402
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

doug wrote:

And the shape of the curve is wrong.


bool lucid(const string & user, bool valid)
{
if (user.trim().lower() == "doug")
return false;

return valid;
}

Well no, a single integral works just fine. This is done in freshman
physics classes.


There is only one way to use a single integral but the equation becomes
much more complicated. I don't see how you can figure out things like
that so I'll finish it.
  #925  
Old April 15th 09, 02:52 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,129
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:


And the shape of the curve is wrong.



bool lucid(const string & user, bool valid)
{
if (user.trim().lower() == "doug")
return false;

return valid;
}


That is another way of saying the curve shape is wrong. Really
phil, this must be embarrassing for you to miss every guess
you have made.

Well no, a single integral works just fine. This is done in freshman
physics classes.



There is only one way to use a single integral but the equation becomes
much more complicated.


There is one equation and it is very simple. It is done in freshman
physics classes and certainly we did it in E&M when I taught that.

I don't see how you can figure out things like
that so I'll finish it.


You could look at a text book.
  #926  
Old April 15th 09, 04:07 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Phil Bouchard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,402
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

doug wrote:

[...]

There is one equation and it is very simple. It is done in freshman
physics classes and certainly we did it in E&M when I taught that.


Doug confuses electromagnetism with kg^2/m^2.

[...]
  #927  
Old April 15th 09, 04:21 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Phil Bouchard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,402
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

doug wrote:

Phil clearly knows nothing about math. He has already demonstrated
he knows nothing about physics.


Doug thinks plagiarism equals intelligence
  #928  
Old April 15th 09, 05:13 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,129
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote:

[...]

There is one equation and it is very simple. It is done in freshman
physics classes and certainly we did it in E&M when I taught that.



Doug confuses electromagnetism with kg^2/m^2.

Phil clearly knows nothing about math. He has already demonstrated
he knows nothing about physics.
[...]

  #929  
Old April 15th 09, 05:51 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Eric Gisse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,465
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

On Apr 14, 7:21*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote:

Phil clearly knows nothing about math. He has already demonstrated
he knows nothing about physics.


Doug thinks plagiarism equals intelligence


You are a ****in' hoot, Phil. You don't have the faintest clue about
physics or mathematics but you forge on anyway - completely and
blissfully ignorant.

Let's see this triple integral that you are worrying about so much.
  #930  
Old April 15th 09, 07:24 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Phil Bouchard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,402
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

Eric Gisse wrote:

You are a ****in' hoot, Phil. You don't have the faintest clue about
physics or mathematics but you forge on anyway - completely and
blissfully ignorant.

Let's see this triple integral that you are worrying about so much.


In the real world people are doing their taxes right now, kid.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Finite Relativism: Review Request Phil Bouchard Astronomy Misc 519 September 25th 12 12:26 AM
25% OFF -- Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof Phil Bouchard Astronomy Misc 0 January 28th 09 09:54 AM
Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof Phil Bouchard Astronomy Misc 4 January 26th 09 09:00 PM
GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT SPECIAL RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 12 January 1st 09 03:20 PM
BLAMING SPECIAL RELATIVITY? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 July 13th 08 01:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.