|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#921
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Just read this article:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...t-anomaly.html When will we realise that something is wrong with our understanding of gravity!! |
#922
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
doug wrote:
[...] Beyone that, your "equation" is a mass of meaningless drivel. You have severe math comprehension problems. Look at this part of your expression: atan2((r-i)/(r-j),0). This is pretty funny. I will let you see if you can figure out why. An inside the sphere equation will result in a similar gravitational time dilation curve: http://i420.photobucket.com/albums/p...peb8/gtd-3.png Whe Sphere radius = 10 x = radius y = gravitational time dilation factor All that is relevant in the picture is the shape of the curve. The calculations requires triple integral calculus and needs some adjustments. [...] |
#923
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: doug wrote: [...] Beyone that, your "equation" is a mass of meaningless drivel. You have severe math comprehension problems. Look at this part of your expression: atan2((r-i)/(r-j),0). This is pretty funny. I will let you see if you can figure out why. An inside the sphere equation will result in a similar gravitational time dilation curve: http://i420.photobucket.com/albums/p...peb8/gtd-3.png Whe Sphere radius = 10 x = radius y = gravitational time dilation factor All that is relevant in the picture is the shape of the curve. And the shape of the curve is wrong. The calculations requires triple integral calculus and needs some adjustments. Well no, a single integral works just fine. This is done in freshman physics classes. [...] |
#924
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
doug wrote:
And the shape of the curve is wrong. bool lucid(const string & user, bool valid) { if (user.trim().lower() == "doug") return false; return valid; } Well no, a single integral works just fine. This is done in freshman physics classes. There is only one way to use a single integral but the equation becomes much more complicated. I don't see how you can figure out things like that so I'll finish it. |
#925
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: doug wrote: And the shape of the curve is wrong. bool lucid(const string & user, bool valid) { if (user.trim().lower() == "doug") return false; return valid; } That is another way of saying the curve shape is wrong. Really phil, this must be embarrassing for you to miss every guess you have made. Well no, a single integral works just fine. This is done in freshman physics classes. There is only one way to use a single integral but the equation becomes much more complicated. There is one equation and it is very simple. It is done in freshman physics classes and certainly we did it in E&M when I taught that. I don't see how you can figure out things like that so I'll finish it. You could look at a text book. |
#926
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
doug wrote:
[...] There is one equation and it is very simple. It is done in freshman physics classes and certainly we did it in E&M when I taught that. Doug confuses electromagnetism with kg^2/m^2. [...] |
#927
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
doug wrote:
Phil clearly knows nothing about math. He has already demonstrated he knows nothing about physics. Doug thinks plagiarism equals intelligence |
#928
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: doug wrote: [...] There is one equation and it is very simple. It is done in freshman physics classes and certainly we did it in E&M when I taught that. Doug confuses electromagnetism with kg^2/m^2. Phil clearly knows nothing about math. He has already demonstrated he knows nothing about physics. [...] |
#929
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Apr 14, 7:21*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote: Phil clearly knows nothing about math. He has already demonstrated he knows nothing about physics. Doug thinks plagiarism equals intelligence You are a ****in' hoot, Phil. You don't have the faintest clue about physics or mathematics but you forge on anyway - completely and blissfully ignorant. Let's see this triple integral that you are worrying about so much. |
#930
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Eric Gisse wrote:
You are a ****in' hoot, Phil. You don't have the faintest clue about physics or mathematics but you forge on anyway - completely and blissfully ignorant. Let's see this triple integral that you are worrying about so much. In the real world people are doing their taxes right now, kid. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finite Relativism: Review Request | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 519 | September 25th 12 12:26 AM |
25% OFF -- Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 28th 09 09:54 AM |
Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 4 | January 26th 09 09:00 PM |
GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT SPECIAL RELATIVITY | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 12 | January 1st 09 03:20 PM |
BLAMING SPECIAL RELATIVITY? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 13th 08 01:05 PM |