Rich field telescope?
On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 3:43:19 PM UTC-7, RichA wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 March 2019 06:02:28 UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 12:53:02 AM UTC-7, RichA wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 13:42:52 UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
On Tuesday, March 12, 2019 at 8:17:07 AM UTC-7, JBI wrote:
On 3/12/19 5:24 AM, StarDust wrote:
On Tuesday, March 12, 2019 at 2:23:23 AM UTC-7, StarDust wrote:
Seems, hew design?
This scope has been around for nearly two years. Reviews aren't great,
but typical for the price and wide field. Google is your friend.
That's what it says, rich-field!
But is it flat field or what?
Just a plain Fraunhofer achromat and a fast one. Will have a bit of colour, not great for planets.
No rich-field scope is good for planets!
Made for photo and wide fields!
1. No, low-power, high-aberration rich-field achromats are the worst for planets.
2. Low-power scopes are poor choices for imaging planets.
3. Colour error bloats star images in deepsky photos.
This scope, I don't think can be used for photo either with that plastic focuser in the back?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|An Incredibly Rich Star Field in Canis Major||Davoud[_1_]||Amateur Astronomy||23||December 21st 09 12:47 AM|
|Urban Richest-Field Telescope?||Margo Schulter||Amateur Astronomy||9||October 2nd 07 11:27 AM|
|Is 1/4 wave good enough for a rich field?||donutbandit||Amateur Astronomy||18||November 27th 03 02:13 AM|
|Rich Field Refractor?||Alan Buttivant||Misc||8||November 17th 03 06:32 AM|
|Building a simple rich field telescope? + laser printer||[email protected]||Amateur Astronomy||0||July 14th 03 05:16 PM|