|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
plane of ecliptic better explained Chapt14 Dirac's Ocean of Positrons= Space (and tells us what gravity is) #106 Atom Totality theory 5th ed.
You know it is hard to replace gravity with positron-space and think
entirely in EM as the force, and it is hard because we are all so used to gravity. But if we think of this Positron ball as the center of the Sun and Earth and that the Space encompassed by Sun and Earth as positron space then we can begin to reconcile our old view of gravity with this new view as EM. We see it in General Relativity where we have a Sun depressing the space fabric around it and then toss in a ball as Earth and how the ball revolves around the depressed fabric. And that depressed-fabric of where mass bends space, that fabric is positrons. So what is nice about Positron-Space as gravity is that it is everywhere, since space is everywhere, and it takes so little of positrons to bend space. As I wrote earlier, a pea sized positron ball at the center of the Sun is all it takes to hold up the Sun and the Solar System and a poppy seed sized positron ball for Earth is all it takes. Now I probably was wrong in saying that a orange sized and grapefruit sized positron balls for globular clusters and for galaxies in solid body rotation, for those positron balls are far smaller than a orange size or grapefruit size. Subject: Dirac's Ocean of Positrons = Space = gravity Subject: several ways of proving positron-gravity is superior to mass- gravity In the prior post I started to list a partial list Â*from (a) through (d) of where positron- 
gravity better explains the actual data of gravity: Here let me ramble on some more about Positron-gravity: Positrons would have no minimum mass to form a gravitational 
bonded system, whereas mass-gravity has a minimum that is larger than 
some reported asteroids gravitationally bound. If you have a few positrons in the center of a asteroid you can quickly have a bound system with other 
asteroids. The oblateness of planets and stars should not exist to the extent seen with mass-gravity. The agreement between observed oblateness and theoretical oblateness is better with positron-gravity. The oblateness 
of Earth 
is especially discordant with Newtonian mass gravity and with General- 
Relativity. Oblateness in a Positron- gravity is due primarily to the 
fact that 
the positron-center-ball itself is spinning on an axis and is oblate 
itself, which 
mirror reflects the oblateness of the planet body. In mass gravity systems, over time the bodies should all disappear into a central clump as they continue to lose energy and thus 
become swallowed up inside the central clump. However, in 
positron-gravity there is no steady inevitable decay of orbit 
since the planet and star have a repelling gravity of its positrons repelling other positrons. So in the old Newton mass gravity 
you do not have that extra term of a gravity-repulsion that you 
have with positron- gravity. This repulsion term provides stability 
for which we see every day in the Solar System. If Newton's 
mass gravity were true then our Solar System would have disappeared 
some billions of years after it was borne, simply because 
mass-gravity continually loses energy and swallowed by the central 
star. Mercury should not have survived for 4 billion years. Subject: Picturing positron-gravity Well this is not a really easy picture. First off, we realize that ordinary matter comes in both proton and electron. And where we never see antimatter unless we probe the vaccuum of Space. So we have to distinguish between Positron-Space and a positron obtained in a laboratory. So that when I speak of a pea sized sphere at the center of the Sun of positrons that causes all the Sun's gravity as a Coulomb force, I do not mean a 
dense sphere of pure positrons. I mean a dense sphere of Positron- Space. Quantum Physics is about particles and there really is no study of Space as Quantum Mechanical. So in QM, talking about an atom you talk about protons, electrons, neutrons, neutrinos, photons and other particles, but QM is rather lacking in discussion of the Space wherein 
these particles reside or interact. Space is sort of the hidden assumption. And one way to 
make this picture is to think of the center of the pseudosphere as the 
center of 
the Sun. The normal matter of the Sun is the sphere of the Sun as a 
astronomical body and the Positron-gravity is thought of as a 
pseudosphere-center. The Sun in our Solar System has the largest 
pseudosphere-center as the center of the Sun itself, with Jupiter the 
next largest pseudosphere- center. 
And here I am trying to put Space on par with the other particles of 
Quantum Mechanics. So what I am saying is that a hydrogen atom is composed of several particles, 1 proton, and 1 electron, and many photons. But a hydrogen atom also has Space wherein that proton and electron reside and that Space is part of the QM of a hydrogen atom. And I am going to call that space a Positron-Space. So the hydrogen atom is composed of 1 proton, 1 electron, many photons and the Positron-Space that houses the electron. That space in the hydrogen atom is 
a pseudosphere whose center is identical to the center of the atom and 
which does not house a 1 unit of positron but houses 10^-40 unit of a 
positron in that 
individual hydrogen atom. Now Positron-Space can be tinkered with to produce actual positrons such as the experiment of coaxing positrons from the vaccuum of space. In Newton Mechanics and Classical Physics and General-Relativity, Space is thought of as empty and ready to be filled by ordinary matter. This is a poor assumption of physics, and even today in Quantum Mechanics we have Space as a hidden assumption. So since all of Quantum Mechanics that we speak of, involves particles 
that interact in a Space but we never detailed what Space actually is 
in QM. 
Now we begin to detail what Space actually is, as Dirac first proposed 
that 
Space is an Ocean of Positrons. But Dirac was not going to get any 
followers 
of his ocean of positrons as space, simply because Dirac did not have 
the 
Atom Totality theory to house that idea. So here I am beginning to detail Space in QM as a particle itself and the best evidence of what particle that Space is, is the positron since whenever we apply energy to the vaccuum of Space out comes positrons. So do not think when I say that a pea sized sphere at the center of the Sun and a poppy seed
or micron sized sphere at the center of the Earth as positrons as 
actually tiny spheres of positrons. 
What they are is that the entire Sun is a Positron-Space pseudosphere 
matching the regular 
matter or ordinary matter of the Sun and that the positrons of the 
Positron-Space are 
most dense at the center of the Sun holding all the mass matter of the 
Sun
in a gravity hold. So I do not want to give the impression that if someone could visit the center of the Sun 
or center of Earth that they would see a pea sized sphere of 
positrons or a micron 
sized sphere of positrons in the Earth and that these tiny spheres 
give us the 
gravity.. The picture I do want to present is that ordinary matter 
occupies space and the 
Space of the Sun has caused a dense Positron-Space in the Sun center that is 
the form of a pseudosphere center. And 
this 
Positron- Space is the force of gravity itself where the positrons of 
the pseudosphere attracts 
the ordinary matter in its vicinity. So gravity becomes an ordinary 
Coulomb force. Now while writing the above I thought of another supporting 
evidence for 
Positron-gravity and dismissal of mass-gravity. There is an obvious 
observation of our solar system which is lacking of a theory explanation. It is the plane of the ecliptic and also the commonplace spiral galaxies such as our own Milky Way. 
Does gravity as mass imply that galaxies or solar-systems should form 
planes 
of revolution? The plane of revolution of the rings of Saturn is 
another example. 
So the question here is whether the mathematics of Newtonian gravity 
and General Relativity gives the outcome of plane of ecliptic, of 
spiral galaxy plane and of plane of rings of Saturn? I doubt it, yet I 
have not worked it out, but I am 
confident that Positron-gravity is a better explanation and the reason 
I say that is 
because if you look at a picture of a pseudosphere, it has one feature 
in common 
with the sphere that it is enclosed inside of, for both share the same identical 
equator. The mathematics of the pseudosphere and sphere are identical 
of their 
equator. The equator is the plane of the ecliptic and the spiral of 
the elliptic galaxy and the rings of Saturn is that pseudosphere 
equator inside Saturn. As I understand it, the mathematics of gravity in General Relativity is the same as in Newtonian mechanics which brings up a sphere, yet that math does not bring up a plane of ecliptic nor the Rings of Saturn. 
But what does bring out the plane of ecliptic and rings of Saturn is 
the mathematics of both the sphere with the pseudosphere included so 
that 
the equator of both are equal. So in a dynamic system of gravitational 
attraction they end up in planes and the superior math of Positron- 
gravity wins over the inferior math of mass-gravity. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chapt14 Dirac's Ocean of Positrons = Space (and tells us what gravityis) #104 Atom Totality theory 5th ed. | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | December 2nd 11 06:25 AM |
Gravity is Dirac's Ocean of Positrons = Space #356 Atom Totalitytheory 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 7th 11 06:08 AM |
Gravity is Dirac's Ocean of Positrons = Space #355 Atom Totalitytheory 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 6th 11 07:15 AM |
Gravity is Dirac's Ocean of Positrons = Space #353 Atom Totalitytheory 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 5th 11 07:45 PM |
still on chapter 4: and GR is replaced by ocean-of-positrons #126 :3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 7th 09 08:53 AM |