A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

revisiting Apollo



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #351  
Old July 20th 04, 03:28 AM
Tom McDonald
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yoda wrote:

Half of you arent worth responding to. Why don't you show your real
powers of scientific observation and answer my other post on why the Big
Bang is baloney....chicken ****


Yoda,

I gave a detailed reply to you last night on a pole shift
thread. I'd like to have you read it and reply, should you choose.

Tom McDonald

snip
  #352  
Old July 20th 04, 04:10 AM
Tim Auton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

CeeBee wrote:
Yoda wrote in sci.astro:

Half of you arent worth responding to.


Which half of me are you now responding to?


CeeBee, I think Yoda may be confusing you with Eric the Half-a-Bee of
Monty Python fame.

Half a bee, philosophically,
Must, ipso facto, half not be.
But half the bee has got to be
Vis a vis, its entity. D'you see?

But can a bee be said to be
Or not to be an entire bee
When half the bee is not a bee
Due to some ancient injury?

La dee dee, one two three,
Eric the half a bee.
A B C D E F G,
Eric the half a bee.

Is this wretched demi-bee,
Half-asleep upon my knee,
Some freak from a menagerie?
No! It's Eric the half a bee!

Fiddle de dum, Fiddle de dee,
Eric the half a bee.
Ho ho ho, tee hee hee,
Eric the half a bee.

I love this hive, employee-ee,
Bisected accidentally,
One summer afternoon by me,
I love him carnally.

He loves him carnally,
Semi-carnally.


Tim
--
My last .sig was rubbish too.
  #353  
Old July 20th 04, 04:10 AM
Tim Auton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

CeeBee wrote:
Yoda wrote in sci.astro:

Half of you arent worth responding to.


Which half of me are you now responding to?


CeeBee, I think Yoda may be confusing you with Eric the Half-a-Bee of
Monty Python fame.

Half a bee, philosophically,
Must, ipso facto, half not be.
But half the bee has got to be
Vis a vis, its entity. D'you see?

But can a bee be said to be
Or not to be an entire bee
When half the bee is not a bee
Due to some ancient injury?

La dee dee, one two three,
Eric the half a bee.
A B C D E F G,
Eric the half a bee.

Is this wretched demi-bee,
Half-asleep upon my knee,
Some freak from a menagerie?
No! It's Eric the half a bee!

Fiddle de dum, Fiddle de dee,
Eric the half a bee.
Ho ho ho, tee hee hee,
Eric the half a bee.

I love this hive, employee-ee,
Bisected accidentally,
One summer afternoon by me,
I love him carnally.

He loves him carnally,
Semi-carnally.


Tim
--
My last .sig was rubbish too.
  #354  
Old July 20th 04, 04:25 AM
Tim Auton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yoda wrote:
[snip]
Oh c'mon, Hawking is allowed to make errors, and in the words of some
crank on here, that is the mark of good science. True scientists know
when they are wrong and man enough to admit it.


Are you man enough to explicitly admit that you were wrong to claim
that members of the US government have admitted that certain footage
from the Apollo landings was faked?

I know you've kind of, almost, sort of admitted it after I showed that
your single source for that assertion (the documentary shown on CBS)
was itself a hoax, but I've yet to see an explicit admission that you
were wrong in making that claim. Are you man enough to include the
words "I was wrong" in your admission?


Tim
--
My last .sig was rubbish too.
  #355  
Old July 20th 04, 04:25 AM
Tim Auton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yoda wrote:
[snip]
Oh c'mon, Hawking is allowed to make errors, and in the words of some
crank on here, that is the mark of good science. True scientists know
when they are wrong and man enough to admit it.


Are you man enough to explicitly admit that you were wrong to claim
that members of the US government have admitted that certain footage
from the Apollo landings was faked?

I know you've kind of, almost, sort of admitted it after I showed that
your single source for that assertion (the documentary shown on CBS)
was itself a hoax, but I've yet to see an explicit admission that you
were wrong in making that claim. Are you man enough to include the
words "I was wrong" in your admission?


Tim
--
My last .sig was rubbish too.
  #356  
Old July 20th 04, 07:17 AM
Paul Lawler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Yoda" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...
Paul Lawler wrote:

"Yoda" wrote in message
ogers.com...

Oh c'mon, Hawking is allowed to make errors, and in the words of some
crank on here, that is the mark of good science. True scientists know
when they are wrong and man enough to admit it.


Too bad you're not.


**** you asshole. I know more about the universe than you can even

imagine.

Thanks for the offer... but all things considered, I think I'd prefer a
woman.


  #357  
Old July 20th 04, 07:17 AM
Paul Lawler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Yoda" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...
Paul Lawler wrote:

"Yoda" wrote in message
ogers.com...

Oh c'mon, Hawking is allowed to make errors, and in the words of some
crank on here, that is the mark of good science. True scientists know
when they are wrong and man enough to admit it.


Too bad you're not.


**** you asshole. I know more about the universe than you can even

imagine.

Thanks for the offer... but all things considered, I think I'd prefer a
woman.


  #358  
Old July 20th 04, 07:18 AM
Paul Lawler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Wally AngleseaT" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:20:57 GMT, Yoda
wrote:

**** you asshole. I know more about the universe than you can even

imagine.


Really? then lets do a test.

What does the light curve of a cepheid variable tell us about the
universe (no peeking).


(jumping up and down, waving furiously) Ooh, ooh, pick me, pick me! I know!


  #359  
Old July 20th 04, 07:18 AM
Paul Lawler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Wally AngleseaT" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:20:57 GMT, Yoda
wrote:

**** you asshole. I know more about the universe than you can even

imagine.


Really? then lets do a test.

What does the light curve of a cepheid variable tell us about the
universe (no peeking).


(jumping up and down, waving furiously) Ooh, ooh, pick me, pick me! I know!


  #360  
Old July 20th 04, 07:19 AM
Jim
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yoda wrote:

And you have wide experience of making footprints in fine material in
low-gravity vacuum environments, and can therefore authoritatively state
this.


Yeah ok, moon dust has the consistency of mud due to its low gravity and
lack of an atmosphere.


So, let me get this straight - *only* mud can retain footprints?

Oh dear, it's really not going your way, is it?

What was your name again?

Jim
--
AIM/iSight:JCAndrew2 - Log in and say 'hi'
"We deal in the moral equivalent of black holes, where the normal
laws of right and wrong break down; beyond those metaphysical
event horizons there exist ... special circumstances" - Use Of Weapons
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) Nathan Jones Astronomy Misc 5 July 29th 04 06:14 AM
Apollo Buzz alDredge Astronomy Misc 5 July 28th 04 10:05 AM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ darla Astronomy Misc 15 July 25th 04 02:57 PM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ v4 Nathan Jones Astronomy Misc 1 November 4th 03 11:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.