|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Longest mission without resupply?
Rusty Barton wrote:
On 16 Apr 2004 13:29:28 -0700, (Rusty B) wrote: If anyone wants a copy of the spreadsheet, let me know and I will post it on my web page for download. - Rusty Barton Please do. Thanks in advance. -- +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ | Dave Downing, Somerset U.K. | +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Longest mission without resupply?
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 11:47:51 +0100, Dave Downing
wrote: If anyone wants a copy of the spreadsheet, let me know and I will post it on my web page for download. - Rusty Barton Please do. Thanks in advance. I've uploaded the Shuttle Spreadsheet to my Redstone missile website Links page: http://www.geocities.com/redstone_mrbm/links.htm Just right click on "Space Shuttle Spreadsheet" and save it. - Rusty Barton |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Longest mission without resupply?
Rusty Barton wrote:
I've uploaded the Shuttle Spreadsheet to my Redstone missile website Links page: http://www.geocities.com/redstone_mrbm/links.htm Just right click on "Space Shuttle Spreadsheet" and save it. - Rusty Barton Got it. Thanks again Rusty. Very comprehensive, a lot of typing for you! -- +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ | Dave Downing, Somerset U.K. | +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Longest mission without resupply?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Longest mission without resupply?
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Doug... wrote: So, it sounds like the Shuttle data supports my supposition that the longest stand-alone spaceflight (i.e., not docking with a station or any other spacecraft that could extend its mission life) was Soyuz 9, at 19 days. Soyuz 9 lasted 17 days, 16 hours, and 58 minutes. Only about 1 hour and 5 minutes longer than STS-80 Columbia. -Mike |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Longest mission without resupply?
In article Pine.GSO.4.58.0404191235470.16334@seds,
says... On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Doug... wrote: So, it sounds like the Shuttle data supports my supposition that the longest stand-alone spaceflight (i.e., not docking with a station or any other spacecraft that could extend its mission life) was Soyuz 9, at 19 days. Soyuz 9 lasted 17 days, 16 hours, and 58 minutes. Only about 1 hour and 5 minutes longer than STS-80 Columbia. OK -- kewl. I *knew* I should have looked up the exact mission length before I posted that... but it still *is* longer. Doug |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Longest mission without resupply?
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Doug... wrote: In article Pine.GSO.4.58.0404191235470.16334@seds, says... On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Doug... wrote: So, it sounds like the Shuttle data supports my supposition that the longest stand-alone spaceflight (i.e., not docking with a station or any other spacecraft that could extend its mission life) was Soyuz 9, at 19 days. Soyuz 9 lasted 17 days, 16 hours, and 58 minutes. Only about 1 hour and 5 minutes longer than STS-80 Columbia. OK -- kewl. I *knew* I should have looked up the exact mission length before I posted that... but it still *is* longer. Yeah, but not by any amount that indicates some kind of innate superiority by Soyuz over STS in that regard. I might also point out that the current day version of the Soyuz spacecraft is not equipped for missions of that length. As Jorge has pointed out on numerous occasions, the Soyuz spacecraft must make it to a space station and dock, or come back immediately before the supplies on-board run out. -Mike |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Longest mission without resupply?
In article Pine.GSO.4.58.0404191727100.8425@seds,
says... On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Doug... wrote: In article Pine.GSO.4.58.0404191235470.16334@seds, says... On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Doug... wrote: So, it sounds like the Shuttle data supports my supposition that the longest stand-alone spaceflight (i.e., not docking with a station or any other spacecraft that could extend its mission life) was Soyuz 9, at 19 days. Soyuz 9 lasted 17 days, 16 hours, and 58 minutes. Only about 1 hour and 5 minutes longer than STS-80 Columbia. OK -- kewl. I *knew* I should have looked up the exact mission length before I posted that... but it still *is* longer. Yeah, but not by any amount that indicates some kind of innate superiority by Soyuz over STS in that regard. I might also point out that the current day version of the Soyuz spacecraft is not equipped for missions of that length. As Jorge has pointed out on numerous occasions, the Soyuz spacecraft must make it to a space station and dock, or come back immediately before the supplies on-board run out. I wasn't trying to insinuate that Soyuz -- especially that early verion of Soyuz -- was innately superior to the STS. Far from it. It was and is more similar to the Gemini than the shuttle in terms of basic capabilities. I just found it interesting that an early Soyuz happened to be the craft that set the record for longest mission using only the spacecraft in which its crew was launched. I'm positive you *could* stretch an STS mission for somewhat longer, if you wanted to -- fly a shuttle with a crew of three or four in its long- duration mode, with a double Spacehab, and you could probably keep them up and flying for a good three weeks or more. But there is no intrinsic reason for flying a mission in a shuttle or another stand-along craft just for the "achievement" of its duration... the station missions are a LOT longer, we're no longer playing one-upsmanship "space firsts" kinds of games with the Russians, and, basically, no one cares about that kind of thing anymore. Now, while the Soyuz ferry variations have all been less long-lived than those first Soyuz craft, they *are* more long-lived now than they were for a while, there. The original redesign of the Soyuz to a ferry configuration assumed such short independent-flight lifetimes that they didn't carry solar panels. They were dependent on a fairly small set of batteries, so if you couldn't manage to dock with whichever Salyut you were aiming for, you had to turn right around and come back home immediately. The T, TM and TMA versions have somewhat longer independent lifetimes than that, partially because the solar panels were restored to those versions. Doug |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Longest mission without resupply?
I have been a nasa shuttle pilot. I can tell you that the mission that you
see on cable news are not the only missions we did. I can only say that we now have ways and means to acomplish very long missions 'without re-supply'. Also, it is no secret that the current 'space shuttle' can go a lot further than simply orbit the earth. A buddy of mine travelled to orbit the moon in the shuttle. The journey lasted seven days plus.. "Mike Dicenso" wrote in message news:Pine.GSO.4.58.0404191235470.16334@seds... On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Doug... wrote: So, it sounds like the Shuttle data supports my supposition that the longest stand-alone spaceflight (i.e., not docking with a station or any other spacecraft that could extend its mission life) was Soyuz 9, at 19 days. Soyuz 9 lasted 17 days, 16 hours, and 58 minutes. Only about 1 hour and 5 minutes longer than STS-80 Columbia. -Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA Names Crew For New Space Shuttle Mission | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 6 | December 7th 03 10:21 PM |
NASA Names Crew Members For Shuttle Return To Flight Mission | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 2 | November 9th 03 08:34 AM |
Return to space for Spanish ESA astronaut | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | October 16th 03 03:21 PM |
NASA Awards Mission Support Operations Contract | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 1 | September 29th 03 11:30 PM |
Booster Crossing | Chuck Stewart | Space Shuttle | 124 | September 15th 03 12:43 AM |