|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
Neinstein means "no mug;"
is no mug half-empty, or half-full? anyway, i was replying to teeHanson, who doesn't support your alleged theory, at all; he merely supports anyone who dysses Einstein, which even I do on certain matters, which is why he *used* to be civil to me. no-one supports your theory, especially you, possibly because of your limited English usage. he doesn't actually have a criticism of relativity, although it's true that you don't have to use it to describe all things, such as "the color of gold." but, it can probably still be framed in relativistic terms, even so. |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
On May 12, 11:04*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote: yes, but you have not analyzed anything about it, such as the major factor of deformation, which is clearly not going to be a linear effect ... anyway, how does it say *any* thing about kinetic energy, if the lighter ball has to be dropped from a higher heighth, to make teh same dent in the same kind of clay? sounds like a nonsequiter, as opposed to a correction of Liebniz et al. 1tree: My $40.00 dropped ball experiment DISPROVES KE = 1/2mv^2 by showing that such could NOT predict the heights of drop of the two different weight balls to cause equal KE values and thus equal embedment into the clay. *** At no point was "clay" ever conceived as being a magic measure of the VALUE of the KE in pounds. *** My correct equation, KE = a/g (m) + v / 32.174 (m) gives the VALUE of the KE to very high accuracy! No dynamic force measuring device can every correctly measure varying KE, because the inertia of the apparatus screws things up. — NoEinstein — |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
On May 12, 11:19*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote: Neinstein means "no mug;" is no mug half-empty, or half-full? anyway, i was replying to teeHanson, who doesn't support your alleged theory, at all; he merely supports anyone who dysses Einstein, which even I do on certain matters, which is why he *used* to be civil to me. no-one supports your theory, especially you, possibly because of your limited English usage. he doesn't actually have a criticism of relativity, although it's true that you don't have to use it to describe all things, such as "the color of gold." *but, it can probably still be framed in relativistic terms, even so. 1tree: I am the King of Science and don't need the approval of anyone for the validity of my New Science truths. Get drunk over that and see if I care. — NE — |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
On May 13, 3:44*pm, NoEinstein wrote:
1tree: *I am the King of Science and don't need the approval of anyone for the validity of my New Science truths. *Get drunk over that and see if I care. *— NE — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egomania |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER his first *vis viva* paper.
In sci.math PD wrote:
On May 13, 3:44?pm, NoEinstein wrote: 1tree: ?I am the King of Science and don't need the approval of anyone for the validity of my New Science truths. ?Get drunk over that and see if I care. ?? NE ? You guys need to read up on narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), narcissistic control and narcissistic supply. -- Ah yes, a very strong brand of anecdotal evidence. Climate science will be proud. The science remains settled, the consensus unshaken. -- Mickey Langan, Sun 2 Jan 2011 10:00 am |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
so, you are assuming that volume of dent
is linear with the kinetic energy, or the momentum, or what ever you are going to call it; how about "a pi-dollar bill?" |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
so, if you think that your dysagreeing with me,
is enought to celebrate by imbibing liquor?... I mean, so far as I have seen, your alleged theory is only -- possibly, you *claim*, not that I or anyone else in Universe has been able to "get" -- determine the deformation of clay, based on a forumla involving momentum, not kinetic energy or force, and nothing else. yeah, you don't need the Nobel Prize cmte. tio validate that, either -- or even the Swedish Bank! congratulation, all-hail the asymptote of all science, Nsinstein -- the mug is full of it! |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
On May 13, 10:04*pm, wrote:
In sci.math PD wrote: On May 13, 3:44?pm, NoEinstein wrote: 1tree: ?I am the King of Science and don't need the approval of anyone for the validity of my New Science truths. ?Get drunk over that and see if I care. ?? NE ? You guys need to read up on narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), narcissistic control and narcissistic supply. -- Ah yes, a very strong brand of anecdotal evidence. Climate science will be proud. The science remains settled, the consensus unshaken. * -- Mickey Langan, Sun 2 Jan 2011 10:00 am Dear k...: My having figured out how the Universe works, and in the process easily disproving Einstein's moronic relativity theories, is in no way a personality disorder. Before you try to categorize me as a scientist, you should actually read some of what I have written. — NoEinstein — Where Angels Fear to Fall http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...hread/8152ef3e... Last Nails in Einstein's Coffin http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...rowse_frm/thre... Pop Quiz for Science Buffs! http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...hread/43f6f316... An Einstein Disproof for Dummies http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...d/thread/f7a63... Another look at Einstein http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...hread/41670721... Three Problems for Math and Science http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...ab43c49c?hl=en Matter from Thin Air http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...1872476bc6ca90 Curing Einstein’s Disease http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...f848ad8aba67da Replicating NoEinstein’s Invalidation of M-M (at sci.math) http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...b2a1511b7b2603 Cleaning Away Einstein’s Mishmash http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...9aef0aee462d26 Dropping Einstein Like a Stone http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...967db2b?hl=en# Plotting the Curves of Coriolis, Einstein, and NoEinstein (is Copyrighted.) http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...17f8274?hl=en# Are Jews Destroying Objectivity in Science? http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...3ba4268d0f33e0 The Gravity of Masses Doesn’t Bend Light. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...29d832240f404d KE = 1/2mv^2 is disproved in new falling object impact test. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...414c2?hl=en&q= Light rays don’t travel on ballistic curves. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...d941d2b2e80002 A BLACK HOLE MYTH GETS BUSTED: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...4c36218?hl=en# SR Ignored the Significance of the = Sign http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...bccf5550412817 Eleaticus confirms that SR has been destroyed! http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...51e93207ee475a NoEinstein Finds Yet Another Reason Why SR Bites-the-Dust! http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...7ef57bf0ed3849 NoEinstein Gives the History & Rationale for Disproving Einstein http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...d7fbe994f569f7 There is no "pull" of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether! http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...272072f?hl=en& PD has questions about science. Can any of you help? http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...3ced1ad?hl=en& Taking a Fresh Look at the Physics of Radiometers. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...1163422440ffd9 A Proposed Gravity-Propelled Swing Experiment. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...=gravity+swing Shedding New Light on Comet Tails http://groups.google.com/g/d8e7fef4/...797453b40de4f?... What is sci.research seeking if not the truth? http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...93f20?lnk=raot Busting MythBusters. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6c137610ee3437 Gravity Effects Across Etherless Regions of Space. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...262930c6655db1 Where is the matter Einstein says velocity creates? http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...38761134ee8408 Dropping Coriolis like a feather. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...c92e2427fd7e98 Busting MythBusters… again. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...772c003f?hl=en SRT Demands Energy in Amounts that Aren’t Available. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...55fb626?hl=en# The Spaghetti-fication of the Brains of the Naïve. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...8104090c?hl=en Mythbusters’ Merry-go-round http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...0f7f9871f38c1c |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
On May 14, 7:55*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote: so, you are assuming that volume of dent is linear with the kinetic energy, or the momentum, or what ever you are going to call it; how about "a pi-dollar bill?" No DUNCE! The equality of the dent is the only datum sought! Other than for that, there isn't a single device ever made, or that will ever be made, that will give a quantitative measure of the force of impact. But not to worry. My KE equation, KE = a/g (m) + v / 32.174 (m) will provide the correct answers to very high accuracy—no experiments necessary! — NE — |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
On May 14, 10:34*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote: so, if you think that your dysagreeing with me, is enought to celebrate by imbibing liquor?... *I mean, so far as I have seen, your alleged theory is only -- possibly, you *claim*, not that I or anyone else in Universe has been able to "get" -- determine the deformation of clay, based on a forumla involving momentum, not kinetic energy or force, and nothing else. yeah, you don't need the Nobel Prize cmte. tio validate that, either -- or even the Swedish Bank! congratulation, all-hail the asymptote of all science, Nsinstein -- the mug is full of it! 1tree: If there were two bullets of the same size sticking out of your very hard forehead, you should be able to look in the mirror and see if those bullets have apparent equal embedment. It wouldn't ever be necessary for you to have a means of knowing the numerical KE of each bullet. Equality, whether by depth of penetration, or by displacement of bone, would be all there is to be determined. Since you have shown yourself to be too... dull to understand equality, why don't you give up replying on these groups at all? — NE — |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper. | Androcles[_39_] | Amateur Astronomy | 464 | March 29th 11 06:09 PM |
THE ALBERT EINSTEIN OF OUR GENERATION IS LYING AGAIN | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 21 | May 30th 07 08:51 AM |
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT | 46erjoe | Misc | 964 | March 10th 07 07:10 AM |
Paper w/cometary panspermia proof & new biology | Jason H. | SETI | 6 | March 15th 04 01:34 PM |