|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
MECO theory would have a quantization of quasars per distance from
--- Quoting in parts from NEW SCIENTIST --- http://www.newscientist.com/article/...uasar-casts-do... Mysterious quasar casts doubt on black holes According to the MECO theory, objects in our universe can never actually collapse to form black holes. When an object gets very dense and hot, subatomic particles start popping in and out of existence inside it in huge numbers, producing copious amounts of radiation. Outward pressure from this radiation halts the collapse so the object remains a hot ball of plasma rather than becoming a black hole. (snipped) Journal reference: The Astronomical Journal (vol 132, p 420) --- end quoting from NEW SCIENTIST --- I had a read of that journal, and alot of the terminology is unfamilar to me and can only assume things. What I was looking for was more specifics on "...popping in and out of existence" and some clues as to the type of radiation and variations. The article suggested that "planetoids mass" was swallowed by the MECO and resulted in a 30% increase in UV radiation. I had a look at quasars in Wikipedia for some information on whether brightness of quasars were correlated with distance, sort of like a Tifft quantization of quasars per distance. --- quoting Wikipedia on quasars energy --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar The emission of large amounts of power from a small region requires a power source far more efficient than the nuclear fusion which powers stars. The release of gravitational energy[citation needed] by matter falling towards a massive black hole is the only process known that can produce such high power continuously. (Stellar explosions - Supernovas and gamma-ray bursts - can do so, but only for a few weeks.) Since quasars exhibit properties common to all active galaxies, the emissions from quasars can be readily compared to those of small active galaxies powered by supermassive black holes. To create a luminosity of 10^40 W ,or Joules per second, (the typical brightness of a quasar), a super-massive black hole would have to consume the material equivalent of 10 stars per year. The brightest known quasars devour 1000 solar masses of material every year. The largest known is estimated to consume matter equivalent to 600 Earths per hour. Quasars 'turn on' and off depending on their surroundings, and since quasars cannot continue to feed at high rates for 10 billion years, after a quasar finishes accreting the surrounding gas and dust, it becomes an ordinary galaxy. --- end quoting --- If quasars are all MECOs (and I believe that to be true) then they should be distributed for the most part, near the Nucleus of the Atom Totality. They should be in the zone beyond the Sloan Great Wall, and rarely found between the Sloan Great Wall and the Milky Way. And there should be a correlation of purely distance from the Nucleus to forming a quasar. The closer or nearby the Nucleus is the chances of having a quasar is huge. That is because the closer to the Nucleus the more dense the matter of the Universe, and matter to fuel the MECO disc of a quasar. Thus, not only are quasars most often found near the Nucleus but that they are the most energetic when getting closer to the Nucleus. This happens to be the what the current data on quasars reports-- the most powerful quasars are the furthest away and the further away are the most abundant number of quasars. The Big Bang theory with its black-hole explanations cannot make sense of the fact that quasars are most abundant beyond the Sloan Great Wall and the most luminous beyond the Sloan. But the Atom Totality predicts that to be the case because the most matter is dense around the Nucleus and sparse the further away. And, the mistake made by the Wikipedia authors of the above is that they neglected "matter to antimatter annihilation" as the source of radiation. So that as a MECO swallows up a planetoid or a star, it in a sense converts the entire mass into energy. Only in an Atom Totality can you have matter to antimatter annihilation explaining quasars, because Space is the Dirac Ocean of Positrons and matter is of the "Atom Totality's electrons" So the two meeting in a MECO results in a quasar. P.S. I can see that in the next edition, that probably the MECO theory with its new reports will be perhaps the largest single evidence of the Atom Totality theory and displacing galaxy distribution and Tifft quantized galaxy speeds; replacing them as the largest supporting evidence. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Drexel's Math Forum and other forums keeping Google honest MECOtheory
I want to say something about one company having too much control over
the science newsgroups, and a control with motivation of ad money revenue. And how I long for the day when we used to have Deja News. Anyway, recently about a month ago Google had a software that in a sense screened what topics one sees when opening up sci.physics, based upon the viewers last topics and sites visited. Trouble with this, is that if allowed to go too far, then it makes a mockery of the "posting order". It makes a mockery of the actual real time posts on the board. So that a viewer who opens up sci.math will see his post in the first ten posts, but in actuality everyone else on the planet opening sci.math would see that post as number 286 if they had the time to scroll through that mess. So this is where University forums play a key role in Usenet science newsgroups in that these forums are not motivated by a ad revenue money, but is dedicated to knowledge and education. So conceivably, one of these days, the forums such as Drexel's Math Forum and other Universities get so disgusted with the constant mickey mouse changing of Google newsgroups and a constant veering away from what DejaNews did better under their software which Google never came close to Deja's facilitation. That these Forums become so disgusted that they just simply have their own sci.math and sci.physics. Or, maybe that is how it naturally evolves in that Drexel's Math Forum seems to have eliminated all the commercial spam. So you use Google as the "free-for-all" and weed it out in the Forums. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MECO theory predictions improves what is observed radiation from | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 21st 09 08:26 PM |
MECO theory reinforced by Atom Totality theory #48 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | May 21st 09 07:51 PM |
MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #41 ;3rd edition book: ATOMTOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 8 | May 20th 09 01:17 AM |
Most Powerful + Great Distance = Quasars. My View on Them?? | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 27 | May 27th 07 12:04 AM |
Elliptical Galaxies,and Quasars to Tell Distance | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 0 | June 26th 06 07:15 PM |