Aether has mass

On Dec 2, 11:32*am, Brad Guth wrote:

And your expertise besides aether parrot is what?

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
the associated wave in the aether passes through both.

Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first
place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter
moves through and displaces the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

Both are aether displacement waves.

Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum
mechanics.

allow me to repeat it,
there are not little rocks o'light,
as shown by Young, a hundred years after Newton's alleged theory.

Newton's "theory" parroted Descartes bizarre "proof,"
showing that the speed of light is faster
in a denser medium.

if you didn't worship the secular church of England,
Isaac Christ, you wouldn't need any aether.

anyway, why would anyone want to push Moon
to the L1 point between Earth and Sun --
wouldn't the grunion bitch about taht?

On Dec 2, 1:09*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote:
allow me to repeat it,
there are not little rocks o'light,
as shown by Young, a hundred years after Newton's alleged theory.

Newton's "theory" parroted Descartes bizarre "proof,"
showing that the speed of light is faster
in a denser medium.

if you didn't worship the secular church of England,
Isaac Christ, you wouldn't need any aether.

anyway, why would anyone want to push Moon
to the L1 point between Earth and Sun --
wouldn't the grunion bitch about taht?

3+% spot of shade, 50% ocean tidal cycles, 25% or less seismic issues
and 1/15th or less of its gamma radiation.

um, well, howsoever those are desirable,
aren't the Lagrange points unstable?

3+% spot of shade, 50% ocean tidal cycles, 25% or less seismic issues
and 1/15th or less of its gamma radiation.

well, I guess that the ones fore & aft by 60 degrees
are somewhat stable, given the Trojan asteroids;
is there anything fore & aft of Eaaarth?

On Dec 2, 4:44*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote:
well, I guess that the ones fore & aft by 60 degrees
are somewhat stable, given the Trojan asteroids;
is there anything fore & aft of Eaaarth?

Orbital stability isn't all that necessary if we park it at Earth L1
and interactively keep it there.

On Dec 2, 10:43*am, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 2, 11:32*am, Brad Guth wrote:



And your expertise besides aether parrot is what?

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
the associated wave in the aether passes through both.

Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first
place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter
moves through and displaces the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

Both are aether displacement waves.

Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum
mechanics.

mpc 755 says: Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity
and quantum
mechanics.
gogo says: Where is the critique to this?

On Dec 2, 6:53*pm, GogoJF wrote:
On Dec 2, 10:43*am, mpc755 wrote:









On Dec 2, 11:32*am, Brad Guth wrote:

And your expertise besides aether parrot is what?

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
the associated wave in the aether passes through both.

Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first
place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter
moves through and displaces the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

Both are aether displacement waves.

Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum
mechanics.

mpc 755 says: *Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity
and quantum mechanics.
gogo says: *Where is the critique to this?

mpc755 is pretty much everything rolled up in one aether package deal.

On Dec 3, 12:45*am, Brad Guth wrote:

mpc 755 says: *Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity
and quantum mechanics.
gogo says: *Where is the critique to this?

mpc755 is pretty much everything rolled up in one aether package deal.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
the associated wave in the aether passes through both.

Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first
place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter
moves through and displaces the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

Both are aether displacement waves.

Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum
mechanics.

On Dec 3, 5:51*am, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 3, 12:45*am, Brad Guth wrote:



mpc 755 says: *Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity
and quantum mechanics.
gogo says: *Where is the critique to this?

mpc755 is pretty much everything rolled up in one aether package deal.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
the associated wave in the aether passes through both.

Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first
place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter
moves through and displaces the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

Both are aether displacement waves.

Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum
mechanics.

Yes it probably does. So, what are you going to do about that?

Is any of this aether theory going into the next round of K-12
textbooks?

Have you edited any of the Wikipedia context to suit?