#21
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 10, 8:29*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Nov 10, 4:16*am, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 10, 1:18*am, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:44:23 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 3:38 pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 11:07 am, Painius wrote: It seems very likely to me that space and dark matter are one and the same. Which means what is postulated as dark matter is aether. Which means aether has mass. Which means aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Which means aether is physically displaced by matter. Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. That all sounds pretty true, if non-mainstream. My main question would concern the *pressure* required behind what you call the "aether". There would have to be some kind of power source that pushes the aether into matter to cause gravitation. Once more - you stated... Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. What is the source of the pressure that is exerted on the displaced aether that causes it to exert inward pressure toward matter? Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. And again, just like the battery in a DC circuit exerts a pressure that moves current through the circuit, there must be a source of the pressure that is exerted by the displaced aether. *In your opinion, what is that source? -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Suspicion always haunts the guilty mind; the thief doth fear each bush an officer." The source is the aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. The aether is, or behaves similar to a supersolid. Think of a bowling alley filled with a supersolid. As you roll the ball toward the pins the bowling ball displaces the supersolid. The supersolid displaces the bowling ball as the supersolid displaces back. This all occurs within the confines of the bowling alley. Consider the Universe to be a very large bowling alley where aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. The aether used to be considered an absolutely stationary space. This is what the Michelson-Morley experiment looked for. The aether is not an absolutely stationary space. Aether is displaced by matter. In order to help conceptualize this, in a simplified view, think of the aether as a stationary space except for the particles of matter moving through it and displacing it. Yes, but how is this aether/supersolid the causation of orbital mechanics, when it's well proven that molecular mass is objectively the cause? Molecular diamagnetics will disable those molecular bonds of gravity, although once sufficiently separated the stronger force of gravity at distance seems to take hold regardless of the amount of those molecular diamagnetic properties. *In other words, the paramagnetic and diagrammatic items can coexist in a orbital dynamic coexistence as long as there's sufficient distance involved, but up close there are those magnetic forces of attraction or repulsion that simply exceed the force of gravity. If aether is a purely inert supersolid, as well as neither paramagnetic nor diamagnetic, and otherwise merely a transparent conductor or medium on behalf of accommodating photons and gravitons would start to make sense as to a cosmic supersolid volume of mass that's 24 times greater than molecular mass. *https://groups.google.com/forum/m/ *http://groups.google.com/groups/search *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/Guth Venus There are no such things as gravitons. Molecular mass is NOT the reason for orbital mechanics. Galaxies orbit at rates when can NOT be explain by the mass of the matter of the galaxies themselves. That's the reason for the need for dark matter in the first place. Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter IS gravity. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:16:53 -0800 (PST), mpc755
wrote: On Nov 10, 1:18*am, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:44:23 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 3:38 pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 11:07 am, Painius wrote: It seems very likely to me that space and dark matter are one and the same. Which means what is postulated as dark matter is aether. Which means aether has mass. Which means aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Which means aether is physically displaced by matter. Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. That all sounds pretty true, if non-mainstream. My main question would concern the *pressure* required behind what you call the "aether". There would have to be some kind of power source that pushes the aether into matter to cause gravitation. Once more - you stated... Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. What is the source of the pressure that is exerted on the displaced aether that causes it to exert inward pressure toward matter? Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. And again, just like the battery in a DC circuit exerts a pressure that moves current through the circuit, there must be a source of the pressure that is exerted by the displaced aether. *In your opinion, what is that source? The source is the aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. The aether is, or behaves similar to a supersolid. Think of a bowling alley filled with a supersolid. As you roll the ball toward the pins the bowling ball displaces the supersolid. The supersolid displaces the bowling ball as the supersolid displaces back. This all occurs within the confines of the bowling alley. Consider the Universe to be a very large bowling alley where aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. The aether used to be considered an absolutely stationary space. This is what the Michelson-Morley experiment looked for. The aether is not an absolutely stationary space. Aether is displaced by matter. In order to help conceptualize this, in a simplified view, think of the aether as a stationary space except for the particles of matter moving through it and displacing it. Your bowling alley analogy works only so far as the walls, ceiling and floor maintain the volume of the bowling alley, thus exerting the pressure required by the displaced aether on the particles of matter. The Universe, however, is not necessarily a walled in, closed in space like the bowling alley. So if we perceive the Universe as an open-on-all-sides sort of place, then there are no walls, ceiling nor floor to exert pressure on the supersolid, which in turn exerts pressure (gravitational) on matter. So in an open Universe, what do you think the source of the pressure on the supersolid is? -- Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Suspicion always haunts the guilty mind; the thief doth fear each bush an officer." |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:58:15 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth
wrote: On Nov 9, 10:18*pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:44:23 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 3:38*pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 11:07 am, Painius wrote: It seems very likely to me that space and dark matter are one and the same. Which means what is postulated as dark matter is aether. Which means aether has mass. Which means aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Which means aether is physically displaced by matter. Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. That all sounds pretty true, if non-mainstream. *My main question would concern the *pressure* required behind what you call the "aether". *There would have to be some kind of power source that pushes the aether into matter to cause gravitation. Once more - you stated... Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. What is the source of the pressure that is exerted on the displaced aether that causes it to exert inward pressure toward matter? Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. And again, just like the battery in a DC circuit exerts a pressure that moves current through the circuit, there must be a source of the pressure that is exerted by the displaced aether. *In your opinion, what is that source? Perhaps aether is the last unknown element of what makes everything tick, and otherwise responsible for what ties everything together, as the grand unification of gravity that could represent the final nail in the coffin of physics. All that is correct, except that the science of physics would not die and will be better off when your statement is confirmed. And yet, oc and Wolter recognized the need for a very forceful power source to push the spatial medium, which oc and I dubbed the sub-Planckian energy domain (SPED), into matter to cause gravitation. So I would like Mike to give his opinion and description of what he thinks that source might be. -- Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "The less their ability, the more their conceit." |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On 11/10/2012 1:11 PM, Painius wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:16:53 -0800 (PST), wrote: Your bowling alley analogy works only so far as the walls, ceiling and floor maintain the volume of the bowling alley, thus exerting the pressure required by the displaced aether on the particles of matter. The Universe, however, is not necessarily a walled in, closed in space like the bowling alley. So if we perceive the Universe as an open-on-all-sides sort of place, then there are no walls, ceiling nor floor to exert pressure on the supersolid, which in turn exerts pressure (gravitational) on matter. So in an open Universe, what do you think the source of the pressure on the supersolid is? I'm with you on this one, Painus. MP3 is quite obviously insane. I'd recommend that he lie down with a cool cloth on his forehead and stay out of bowling alleys He needs to slow his roll. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. åäŗ® http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On 11/10/2012 1:26 PM, Painius wrote:
All that is correct, except that the science of physics would not die and will be better off when your statement is confirmed. And yet, oc and Wolter recognized the need for a very forceful power source to push the spatial medium, which oc and I dubbed the sub-Planckian energy domain (SPED), into matter to cause gravitation. So I would like Mike to give his opinion and description of what he thinks that source might be. I'm gonna go out on a limb and predict that it will involve a bowling alley. Just a shot in the dark. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. åäŗ® http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 10, 10:26*am, Painius wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:58:15 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 9, 10:18 pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:44:23 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 3:38 pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 11:07 am, Painius wrote: It seems very likely to me that space and dark matter are one and the same. Which means what is postulated as dark matter is aether. Which means aether has mass. Which means aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Which means aether is physically displaced by matter. Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. That all sounds pretty true, if non-mainstream. My main question would concern the *pressure* required behind what you call the "aether". There would have to be some kind of power source that pushes the aether into matter to cause gravitation. Once more - you stated... Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. What is the source of the pressure that is exerted on the displaced aether that causes it to exert inward pressure toward matter? Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. And again, just like the battery in a DC circuit exerts a pressure that moves current through the circuit, there must be a source of the pressure that is exerted by the displaced aether. In your opinion, what is that source? Perhaps aether is the last unknown element of what makes everything tick, and otherwise responsible for what ties everything together, as the grand unification of gravity that could represent the final nail in the coffin of physics. All that is correct, except that the science of physics would not die and will be better off when your statement is confirmed. And yet, oc and Wolter recognized the need for a very forceful power source to push the spatial medium, which oc and I dubbed the sub-Planckian energy domain (SPED), into matter to cause gravitation. So I would like Mike to give his opinion and description of what he thinks that source might be. -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "The less their ability, the more their conceit." mpc755 isn't set up to do the complex physics proof-testing on any scale that could demonstrate his aether form of such a clear/ transparent medium, that is 24 times more massive than the molecular mass that we ordinary physics wizards can detect and/or perceive of. With some additional analogy and others looking into what dark/clear energy or that of its inert or possibly 2D quantum string mass could be, and as to how it interacts with ordinary 3D molecular mass, would be a good thing. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 10, 1:11Ā*pm, Painius wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:16:53 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 10, 1:18Ā*am, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:44:23 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 3:38 pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 11:07 am, Painius wrote: It seems very likely to me that space and dark matter are one and the same. Which means what is postulated as dark matter is aether. Which means aether has mass. Which means aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Which means aether is physically displaced by matter. Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. That all sounds pretty true, if non-mainstream. My main question would concern the *pressure* required behind what you call the "aether". There would have to be some kind of power source that pushes the aether into matter to cause gravitation. Once more - you stated... Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. What is the source of the pressure that is exerted on the displaced aether that causes it to exert inward pressure toward matter? Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. And again, just like the battery in a DC circuit exerts a pressure that moves current through the circuit, there must be a source of the pressure that is exerted by the displaced aether. Ā*In your opinion, what is that source? The source is the aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. The aether is, or behaves similar to a supersolid. Think of a bowling alley filled with a supersolid. As you roll the ball toward the pins the bowling ball displaces the supersolid. The supersolid displaces the bowling ball as the supersolid displaces back. This all occurs within the confines of the bowling alley. Consider the Universe to be a very large bowling alley where aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. The aether used to be considered an absolutely stationary space. This is what the Michelson-Morley experiment looked for. The aether is not an absolutely stationary space. Aether is displaced by matter. In order to help conceptualize this, in a simplified view, think of the aether as a stationary space except for the particles of matter moving through it and displacing it. Your bowling alley analogy works only so far as the walls, ceiling and floor maintain the volume of the bowling alley, thus exerting the pressure required by the displaced aether on the particles of matter. The Universe, however, is not necessarily a walled in, closed in space like the bowling alley. Ā*So if we perceive the Universe as an open-on-all-sides sort of place, then there are no walls, ceiling nor floor to exert pressure on the supersolid, which in turn exerts pressure (gravitational) on matter. Ā*So in an open Universe, what do you think the source of the pressure on the supersolid is? -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Suspicion always haunts the guilty mind; the thief doth fear each bush an officer." I understand aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. I understand this to mean where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. If you prefer to not understand this and choose to believe in magic particles which flow toward the Earth and magically transition from particle to energy back to particle again then that is your choice. 'An Extended Dynamical Equation of Motion, Phase Dependency and Inertial Backreaction' http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3458 "We hypothesize that space itself resists such surges according to a kind of induction law (related to inertia); additionally, we provide further evidence of the āfluidicā nature of space itself." The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid, a supersolid, which is described in the article as the 'fluidic' nature of space itself. The 'back-reaction' described in the article is the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the matter. The following article describes the aether as an incompressible fluid resulting in what the article refers to as gravitational aether caused by pressure (or vorticity). 'Phenomenology of Gravitational Aether as a solution to the Old Cosmological Constant Problem' http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3955 "One proposal to address this puzzle at the semi-classical level is to decouple quantum vacuum from space-time geometry via a modification of gravity that includes an incompressible fluid, known as Gravitational Aether. In this paper, we discuss classical predictions of this theory along with its compatibility with cosmological and experimental tests of gravity. We argue that deviations from General Relativity (GR) in this theory are sourced by pressure or vorticity." The following article describes gravity as a pressure exerted by aether toward matter. 'The aether-modified gravity and the G Ģdel metric' http://arxiv.org/pdf/1109.5654v2 "As for the pressure, it is equal to p = 53āĪ±g,6a2 so, it is positive if Ī±g 3 which is the weaker condition than the previous one. One notes that the results corresponding to the usual gravity are easily recovered. Also, it is easy to see that the interval Ī±g 15 corresponds to the usual matter." The following article describes a gravitating vacuum where aether is the quantum vacuum of the 21-st century. 'From Analogue Models to Gravitating Vacuum' http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.1155 "The aether of the 21-st century is the quantum vacuum, which is a new form of matter. This is the real substance" The following articles describe what is presently postulated as dark matter is aether. 'Quantum aether and an invariant Planck scale' http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3753 "this version of aether may have some bearing on the abundance of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in our universe." "mass of the aether" 'Scalars, Vectors and Tensors from Metric-Affine Gravity' http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.5168 "the model obtained here gets closer to the aether theory of , which is shown therein to be an alternative to the cold dark matter." 'Unified model for dark matter and quintessence' http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0610135 "Superfluid dark matter is reminiscent of the aether and modeling the universe using superfluid aether is compatible." 'Vainshtein mechanism in Gauss-Bonnet gravity and Galileon aether' http://arxiv.org/pdf/1107.1892 "the perturbations of the scalar field do not propagate in the Minkowski space-time but rather in some form of āaetherā because of the presence of the background field" |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 10, 1:26*pm, Painius wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:58:15 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 9, 10:18 pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:44:23 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 3:38 pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 11:07 am, Painius wrote: It seems very likely to me that space and dark matter are one and the same. Which means what is postulated as dark matter is aether. Which means aether has mass. Which means aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Which means aether is physically displaced by matter. Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. That all sounds pretty true, if non-mainstream. My main question would concern the *pressure* required behind what you call the "aether". There would have to be some kind of power source that pushes the aether into matter to cause gravitation. Once more - you stated... Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. What is the source of the pressure that is exerted on the displaced aether that causes it to exert inward pressure toward matter? Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. And again, just like the battery in a DC circuit exerts a pressure that moves current through the circuit, there must be a source of the pressure that is exerted by the displaced aether. In your opinion, what is that source? Perhaps aether is the last unknown element of what makes everything tick, and otherwise responsible for what ties everything together, as the grand unification of gravity that could represent the final nail in the coffin of physics. All that is correct, except that the science of physics would not die and will be better off when your statement is confirmed. And yet, oc and Wolter recognized the need for a very forceful power source to push the spatial medium, which oc and I dubbed the sub-Planckian energy domain (SPED), into matter to cause gravitation. So I would like Mike to give his opinion and description of what he thinks that source might be. -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "The less their ability, the more their conceit." The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid. I believe aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. This means where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. A moving particle displaces the aether. The displaced aether fills-in where the particle had been. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward the matter. Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 10, 1:36*pm, HVAC wrote:
On 11/10/2012 1:11 PM, Painius wrote: On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:16:53 -0800 (PST), wrote: Your bowling alley analogy works only so far as the walls, ceiling and floor maintain the volume of the bowling alley, thus exerting the pressure required by the displaced aether on the particles of matter. The Universe, however, is not necessarily a walled in, closed in space like the bowling alley. *So if we perceive the Universe as an open-on-all-sides sort of place, then there are no walls, ceiling nor floor to exert pressure on the supersolid, which in turn exerts pressure (gravitational) on matter. *So in an open Universe, what do you think the source of the pressure on the supersolid is? I'm with you on this one, Painus. *MP3 is quite obviously insane. I'd recommend that he lie down with a cool cloth on his forehead and stay out of bowling alleys *He needs to slow his roll. Are you able to understand objects interact with a supersolid? You are in a bowling alley filled with a supersolid. You roll the bowling ball toward the pins. You are able to understand the bowling ball displaces the supersolid, correct? You are able to understand there is no loss of energy between the bowling ball and the supersolid because that's what supersolid means, correct? You are able to understand the bowling ball will roll forever through the supersolid, correct? The interaction of an object and a supersolid does not mean no interaction. It means no loss of energy in the interaction. The bowling ball requires energy to displace the supersolid. The supersolid returns to the bowling ball the same amount of energy as the supersolid 'displaces back'. Q. Is the bowling ball displacing the supersolid or is the supersolid displacing the bowling ball? A. Both occur simultaneously with equal force. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 10, 1:43Ā*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Nov 10, 10:26Ā*am, Painius wrote: On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:58:15 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 9, 10:18 pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:44:23 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 3:38 pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 11:07 am, Painius wrote: It seems very likely to me that space and dark matter are one and the same. Which means what is postulated as dark matter is aether. Which means aether has mass. Which means aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Which means aether is physically displaced by matter. Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. That all sounds pretty true, if non-mainstream. My main question would concern the *pressure* required behind what you call the "aether". There would have to be some kind of power source that pushes the aether into matter to cause gravitation. Once more - you stated... Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. What is the source of the pressure that is exerted on the displaced aether that causes it to exert inward pressure toward matter? Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. And again, just like the battery in a DC circuit exerts a pressure that moves current through the circuit, there must be a source of the pressure that is exerted by the displaced aether. In your opinion, what is that source? Perhaps aether is the last unknown element of what makes everything tick, and otherwise responsible for what ties everything together, as the grand unification of gravity that could represent the final nail in the coffin of physics. All that is correct, except that the science of physics would not die and will be better off when your statement is confirmed. And yet, oc and Wolter recognized the need for a very forceful power source to push the spatial medium, which oc and I dubbed the sub-Planckian energy domain (SPED), into matter to cause gravitation. So I would like Mike to give his opinion and description of what he thinks that source might be. -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "The less their ability, the more their conceit." mpc755 isn't set up to do the complex physics proof-testing on any scale that could demonstrate his aether form of such a clear/ transparent medium, that is 24 times more massive than the molecular mass that we ordinary physics wizards can detect and/or perceive of. With some additional analogy and others looking into what dark/clear energy or that of its inert or possibly 2D quantum string mass could be, and as to how it interacts with ordinary 3D molecular mass, would be a good thing. 'An Extended Dynamical Equation of Motion, Phase Dependency and Inertial Backreaction' http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3458 "We hypothesize that space itself resists such surges according to a kind of induction law (related to inertia); additionally, we provide further evidence of the āfluidicā nature of space itself." The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid, a supersolid, which is described in the article as the 'fluidic' nature of space itself. The 'back-reaction' described in the article is the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the matter. The following article describes the aether as an incompressible fluid resulting in what the article refers to as gravitational aether caused by pressure (or vorticity). 'Phenomenology of Gravitational Aether as a solution to the Old Cosmological Constant Problem' http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3955 "One proposal to address this puzzle at the semi-classical level is to decouple quantum vacuum from space-time geometry via a modification of gravity that includes an incompressible fluid, known as Gravitational Aether. In this paper, we discuss classical predictions of this theory along with its compatibility with cosmological and experimental tests of gravity. We argue that deviations from General Relativity (GR) in this theory are sourced by pressure or vorticity." The following article describes gravity as a pressure exerted by aether toward matter. 'The aether-modified gravity and the G Ģdel metric' http://arxiv.org/pdf/1109.5654v2 "As for the pressure, it is equal to p = 53āĪ±g,6a2 so, it is positive if Ī±g 3 which is the weaker condition than the previous one. One notes that the results corresponding to the usual gravity are easily recovered. Also, it is easy to see that the interval Ī±g 15 corresponds to the usual matter." The following article describes a gravitating vacuum where aether is the quantum vacuum of the 21-st century. 'From Analogue Models to Gravitating Vacuum' http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.1155 "The aether of the 21-st century is the quantum vacuum, which is a new form of matter. This is the real substance" The following articles describe what is presently postulated as dark matter is aether. 'Quantum aether and an invariant Planck scale' http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3753 "this version of aether may have some bearing on the abundance of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in our universe." "mass of the aether" 'Scalars, Vectors and Tensors from Metric-Affine Gravity' http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.5168 "the model obtained here gets closer to the aether theory of , which is shown therein to be an alternative to the cold dark matter." 'Unified model for dark matter and quintessence' http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0610135 "Superfluid dark matter is reminiscent of the aether and modeling the universe using superfluid aether is compatible." 'Vainshtein mechanism in Gauss-Bonnet gravity and Galileon aether' http://arxiv.org/pdf/1107.1892 "the perturbations of the scalar field do not propagate in the Minkowski space-time but rather in some form of āaetherā because of the presence of the background field" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 1161 | March 11th 13 08:37 PM |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | November 9th 12 09:43 PM |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 9th 12 05:30 PM |
Experimental evidence aether has mass | mpc755 | Astronomy Misc | 4 | November 27th 10 02:50 PM |
Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass implies imaginary mass | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 1st 05 08:36 PM |