#11
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
Posting it twice is just twice the bull****- On 11/9/2012 5:33 PM, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 5:10 pm, wrote: On 11/9/2012 3:57 PM, mpc755 wrote: Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. Sort of matter/antimatter, except without any bad reactions taking place? I see anti-matter as matter with opposite spin. This is different. The aether is, or behaves similar to a supersolid. Think of the bowling alley filled with a supersolid. As you roll the ball toward the pins the bowling ball displaces the supersolid. The supersolid displaces the bowling ball as the supersolid displaces back. This all occurs within the confines of the bowling alley. Consider the Universe to be a very large bowling alley where aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. I have a very important question: Ten pin or candle pin? Are you able to understand objects interact with a supersolid? You are in a bowling alley filled with a supersolid. You roll the bowling ball toward the pins. You are able to understand the bowling ball displaces the supersolid, correct? You are able to understand there is no loss of energy between the bowling ball and the supersolid because that's what supersolid means, correct? You are able to understand the bowling ball will roll forever through the supersolid, correct? The interaction of an object and a supersolid does not mean no interaction. It means no loss of energy in the interaction. The bowling ball requires energy to displace the supersolid. The supersolid returns to the bowling ball the same amount of energy as the supersolid 'displaces back'. Q. Is the bowling ball displacing the supersolid or is the supersolid displacing the bowling ball? A. Both occur simultaneously with equal force. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮 http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
Are you able to understand objects interact with a supersolid?
You are in a bowling alley filled with a supersolid. You roll the bowling ball toward the pins. You are able to understand the bowling ball displaces the supersolid, correct? You are able to understand there is no loss of energy between the bowling ball and the supersolid because that's what supersolid means, correct? You are able to understand the bowling ball will roll forever through the supersolid, correct? The interaction of an object and a supersolid does not mean no interaction. It means no loss of energy in the interaction. The bowling ball requires energy to displace the supersolid. The supersolid returns to the bowling ball the same amount of energy as the supersolid 'displaces back'. Q. Is the bowling ball displacing the supersolid or is the supersolid displacing the bowling ball? A. Both occur simultaneously with equal force. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 9, 2:19*pm, mpc755 wrote:
On Nov 9, 4:42*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 9, 12:57*pm, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 3:52*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 9, 12:44*pm, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 3:38*pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 11:07 am, Painius wrote: It seems very likely to me that space and dark matter are one and the same. Which means what is postulated as dark matter is aether. Which means aether has mass. Which means aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Which means aether is physically displaced by matter. Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. That all sounds pretty true, if non-mainstream. *My main question would concern the *pressure* required behind what you call the "aether". *There would have to be some kind of power source that pushes the aether into matter to cause gravitation. Once more - you stated... Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. What is the source of the pressure that is exerted on the displaced aether that causes it to exert inward pressure toward matter? -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "To live a creative life, you must lose your fear of being wrong." Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. Sort of matter/antimatter, except without any bad reactions taking place? I see anti-matter as matter with opposite spin. This is different. The aether is, or behaves similar to a supersolid. Think of the bowling alley filled with a supersolid. As you roll the ball toward the pins the bowling ball displaces the supersolid. The supersolid displaces the bowling ball as the supersolid displaces back. This all occurs within the confines of the bowling alley. Consider the Universe to be a very large bowling alley where aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. That's all fine and dandy. So, what's your best swag as to how much the all-inclusive universe (including its aether) weighs? In other words, what is the average IGM mass of a m3 worth of aether? http://www.space.com/11642-dark-matt...rcent-universe... "All the stars, planets and galaxies that can be seen today make up just 4 percent of the universe. The other 96 percent is made of stuff astronomers can't see, detect or even comprehend." Dark matter is aether. Dark energy is aether emitted into the Universal jet. Aether makes up 96% of the Universe. In other words, aether as dark/cleat matter is worth at least 24 times as much as molecular matter. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 9, 2:34*pm, mpc755 wrote:
On Nov 9, 5:33*pm, HVAC wrote: On 11/9/2012 5:19 PM, mpc755 wrote: "All the stars, planets and galaxies that can be seen today make up just 4 percent of the universe. The other 96 percent is made of stuff astronomers can't see, detect or even comprehend." Dark matter is aether. Dark energy is aether emitted into the Universal jet. Aether makes up 96% of the Universe. Absolute and utter hogwash. Are you able to understand objects interact with a supersolid? You are in a bowling alley filled with a supersolid. You roll the bowling ball toward the pins. You are able to understand the bowling ball displaces the supersolid, correct? You are able to understand there is no loss of energy between the bowling ball and the supersolid because that's what supersolid means, correct? You are able to understand the bowling ball will roll forever through the supersolid, correct? The interaction of an object and a supersolid does not mean no interaction. It means no loss of energy in the interaction. The bowling ball requires energy to displace the supersolid. The supersolid returns to the bowling ball the same amount of energy as the supersolid 'displaces back'. Q. Is the bowling ball displacing the supersolid or is the supersolid displacing the bowling ball? A. Both occur simultaneously with equal force. Harlow is incapable of understanding much of anything, especially if it's not mainstream and Semite approved. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:44:23 -0800 (PST), mpc755
wrote: On Nov 9, 3:38*pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 11:07 am, Painius wrote: It seems very likely to me that space and dark matter are one and the same. Which means what is postulated as dark matter is aether. Which means aether has mass. Which means aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Which means aether is physically displaced by matter. Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. That all sounds pretty true, if non-mainstream. *My main question would concern the *pressure* required behind what you call the "aether". *There would have to be some kind of power source that pushes the aether into matter to cause gravitation. Once more - you stated... Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. What is the source of the pressure that is exerted on the displaced aether that causes it to exert inward pressure toward matter? Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. And again, just like the battery in a DC circuit exerts a pressure that moves current through the circuit, there must be a source of the pressure that is exerted by the displaced aether. In your opinion, what is that source? -- Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Suspicion always haunts the guilty mind; the thief doth fear each bush an officer." |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 10, 1:18*am, Painius wrote:
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:44:23 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 3:38 pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 11:07 am, Painius wrote: It seems very likely to me that space and dark matter are one and the same. Which means what is postulated as dark matter is aether. Which means aether has mass. Which means aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Which means aether is physically displaced by matter. Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. That all sounds pretty true, if non-mainstream. My main question would concern the *pressure* required behind what you call the "aether". There would have to be some kind of power source that pushes the aether into matter to cause gravitation. Once more - you stated... Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. What is the source of the pressure that is exerted on the displaced aether that causes it to exert inward pressure toward matter? Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. And again, just like the battery in a DC circuit exerts a pressure that moves current through the circuit, there must be a source of the pressure that is exerted by the displaced aether. *In your opinion, what is that source? -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Suspicion always haunts the guilty mind; the thief doth fear each bush an officer." The source is the aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. The aether is, or behaves similar to a supersolid. Think of a bowling alley filled with a supersolid. As you roll the ball toward the pins the bowling ball displaces the supersolid. The supersolid displaces the bowling ball as the supersolid displaces back. This all occurs within the confines of the bowling alley. Consider the Universe to be a very large bowling alley where aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. The aether used to be considered an absolutely stationary space. This is what the Michelson-Morley experiment looked for. The aether is not an absolutely stationary space. Aether is displaced by matter. In order to help conceptualize this, in a simplified view, think of the aether as a stationary space except for the particles of matter moving through it and displacing it. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 9, 10:18*pm, Painius wrote:
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:44:23 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 3:38*pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 11:07 am, Painius wrote: It seems very likely to me that space and dark matter are one and the same. Which means what is postulated as dark matter is aether. Which means aether has mass. Which means aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Which means aether is physically displaced by matter. Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. That all sounds pretty true, if non-mainstream. *My main question would concern the *pressure* required behind what you call the "aether". *There would have to be some kind of power source that pushes the aether into matter to cause gravitation. Once more - you stated... Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. What is the source of the pressure that is exerted on the displaced aether that causes it to exert inward pressure toward matter? Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. And again, just like the battery in a DC circuit exerts a pressure that moves current through the circuit, there must be a source of the pressure that is exerted by the displaced aether. *In your opinion, what is that source? -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Suspicion always haunts the guilty mind; the thief doth fear each bush an officer." Perhaps aether is the last unknown element of what makes everything tick, and otherwise responsible for what ties everything together, as the grand unification of gravity that could represent the final nail in the coffin of physics. https://groups.google.com/forum/m/ http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/Guth Venus |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 10, 7:58*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Nov 9, 10:18*pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:44:23 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 3:38*pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 11:07 am, Painius wrote: It seems very likely to me that space and dark matter are one and the same. Which means what is postulated as dark matter is aether. Which means aether has mass. Which means aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Which means aether is physically displaced by matter. Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. That all sounds pretty true, if non-mainstream. *My main question would concern the *pressure* required behind what you call the "aether". *There would have to be some kind of power source that pushes the aether into matter to cause gravitation. Once more - you stated... Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. What is the source of the pressure that is exerted on the displaced aether that causes it to exert inward pressure toward matter? Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. And again, just like the battery in a DC circuit exerts a pressure that moves current through the circuit, there must be a source of the pressure that is exerted by the displaced aether. *In your opinion, what is that source? -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Suspicion always haunts the guilty mind; the thief doth fear each bush an officer." Perhaps aether is the last unknown element of what makes everything tick, and otherwise responsible for what ties everything together, as the grand unification of gravity that could represent the final nail in the coffin of physics. *https://groups.google.com/forum/m/ *http://groups.google.com/groups/search *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/Guth Venus Mainstream physics is completely screwed up. It is completely screwed up because it is in denial of the existence of aether. Not only is it in denial of the existence of the aether it is in denial of understanding aether has mass. Most, if not all, of the absurdities in mainstream physics have to do with its denial of the aether. The nonsense associated with trying to explain what occurs physically in nature in a double slit experiment to explaining what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity goes away when you correctly understand aether has mass. Mainstream physics is so screwed up it can't even bring itself to understand what the evidence of non-baryonic dark matter not anchored to matter means. Mainstream physics is so screwed up it can't even understand this means particles of matter move through and displace the aether. Quick summary of what is correctly explained by understanding aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space. - gravity - what occurs physically in nature in a double slit experiment - the casimir effect - non-baryonic dark matter not anchored to matter - offset between galaxy clusters and the light lensing through the space neighboring the galaxy clusters - the wave out ahead of our solar system - the pushing back and inward pressure toward the solar system discovered by voyager - the ring surrounding galaxy cluster collisions - the milky way's halo - gravitational waves - pilot-waves - the relationship between mass and energy And that's just the start... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 10, 8:14*am, mpc755 wrote:
On Nov 10, 7:58*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 9, 10:18*pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:44:23 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 3:38*pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 11:07 am, Painius wrote: It seems very likely to me that space and dark matter are one and the same. Which means what is postulated as dark matter is aether. Which means aether has mass. Which means aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Which means aether is physically displaced by matter. Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. That all sounds pretty true, if non-mainstream. *My main question would concern the *pressure* required behind what you call the "aether". *There would have to be some kind of power source that pushes the aether into matter to cause gravitation. Once more - you stated... Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. What is the source of the pressure that is exerted on the displaced aether that causes it to exert inward pressure toward matter? Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. And again, just like the battery in a DC circuit exerts a pressure that moves current through the circuit, there must be a source of the pressure that is exerted by the displaced aether. *In your opinion, what is that source? -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Suspicion always haunts the guilty mind; the thief doth fear each bush an officer." Perhaps aether is the last unknown element of what makes everything tick, and otherwise responsible for what ties everything together, as the grand unification of gravity that could represent the final nail in the coffin of physics. *https://groups.google.com/forum/m/ *http://groups.google.com/groups/search *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/Guth Venus Mainstream physics is completely screwed up. It is completely screwed up because it is in denial of the existence of aether. Not only is it in denial of the existence of the aether it is in denial of understanding aether has mass. Most, if not all, of the absurdities in mainstream physics have to do with its denial of the aether. The nonsense associated with trying to explain what occurs physically in nature in a double slit experiment to explaining what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity goes away when you correctly understand aether has mass. Mainstream physics is so screwed up it can't even bring itself to understand what the evidence of non-baryonic dark matter not anchored to matter means. Mainstream physics is so screwed up it can't even understand this means particles of matter move through and displace the aether. Quick summary of what is correctly explained by understanding aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space. - gravity - what occurs physically in nature in a double slit experiment - the casimir effect - non-baryonic dark matter not anchored to matter - offset between galaxy clusters and the light lensing through the space neighboring the galaxy clusters - the wave out ahead of our solar system - the pushing back and inward pressure toward the solar system discovered by voyager - the ring surrounding galaxy cluster collisions - the milky way's halo - gravitational waves - pilot-waves - the relationship between mass and energy And that's just the start... - what curved spacetime physically exists as in nature |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 10, 4:16*am, mpc755 wrote:
On Nov 10, 1:18*am, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:44:23 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 3:38 pm, Painius wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 9, 11:07 am, Painius wrote: It seems very likely to me that space and dark matter are one and the same. Which means what is postulated as dark matter is aether. Which means aether has mass. Which means aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Which means aether is physically displaced by matter. Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. That all sounds pretty true, if non-mainstream. My main question would concern the *pressure* required behind what you call the "aether". There would have to be some kind of power source that pushes the aether into matter to cause gravitation. Once more - you stated... Which means displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Which means displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. What is the source of the pressure that is exerted on the displaced aether that causes it to exert inward pressure toward matter? Aether exists where particles of matter do not. Where particles of matter exist the aether is displaced. And again, just like the battery in a DC circuit exerts a pressure that moves current through the circuit, there must be a source of the pressure that is exerted by the displaced aether. *In your opinion, what is that source? -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Suspicion always haunts the guilty mind; the thief doth fear each bush an officer." The source is the aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. The aether is, or behaves similar to a supersolid. Think of a bowling alley filled with a supersolid. As you roll the ball toward the pins the bowling ball displaces the supersolid. The supersolid displaces the bowling ball as the supersolid displaces back. This all occurs within the confines of the bowling alley. Consider the Universe to be a very large bowling alley where aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. The aether used to be considered an absolutely stationary space. This is what the Michelson-Morley experiment looked for. The aether is not an absolutely stationary space. Aether is displaced by matter. In order to help conceptualize this, in a simplified view, think of the aether as a stationary space except for the particles of matter moving through it and displacing it. Yes, but how is this aether/supersolid the causation of orbital mechanics, when it's well proven that molecular mass is objectively the cause? Molecular diamagnetics will disable those molecular bonds of gravity, although once sufficiently separated the stronger force of gravity at distance seems to take hold regardless of the amount of those molecular diamagnetic properties. In other words, the paramagnetic and diagrammatic items can coexist in a orbital dynamic coexistence as long as there's sufficient distance involved, but up close there are those magnetic forces of attraction or repulsion that simply exceed the force of gravity. If aether is a purely inert supersolid, as well as neither paramagnetic nor diamagnetic, and otherwise merely a transparent conductor or medium on behalf of accommodating photons and gravitons would start to make sense as to a cosmic supersolid volume of mass that's 24 times greater than molecular mass. https://groups.google.com/forum/m/ http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/Guth Venus |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 1161 | March 11th 13 07:37 PM |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | November 9th 12 08:43 PM |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 9th 12 04:30 PM |
Experimental evidence aether has mass | mpc755 | Astronomy Misc | 4 | November 27th 10 01:50 PM |
Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass implies imaginary mass | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 1st 05 08:36 PM |