#1
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 07:53:57 -0800 (PST), mpc755
wrote: On Nov 9, 10:47*am, Painius wrote: On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 08:48:58 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 8, 11:31 am, Painius wrote: On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 05:40:01 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 6, 1:55 pm, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 6, 4:47 pm, Painius wrote: On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:31:16 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 6, 2:50 pm, HVAC wrote: On 11/6/2012 1:41 PM, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 6, 1:17 pm, wrote: On 11/6/2012 12:55 PM, Mike Cavedon wrote: Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012...Dark_Core.html Ether exists exactly as much as ghosts exist. When performing ANY calculations, ether, god and ghosts can be treated exactly in the same manner...As if they do not exist at all. "space without ether is unthinkable" - Albert Einstein Times change. And mainstream physics is so screwed up it can't understand displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity and in a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether through both. "It is ironic that Einstein's most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed [..] The word 'ether' has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. . . . Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry. [..] It turns out that such matter exists. About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo." - Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University For some odd reason, they threw the baby out with the bathwater. And then they deny that's what happened. Einstein said, "According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable". Interpret that as you may. It certainly is NOT Einstein doing away with the ether. There is physical evidence 'non-baryonic dark matter' is not anchored to matter. This means matter moves through 'non-baryonic dark matter'. If matter moves through 'non-baryonic dark matter' then that means aether has mass. It is so simple it is ridiculous. Once you understand aether has mass you understand displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity. Once you understand aether has mass you understand the wave of wave- particle duality is a wave in the aether. Once you understand aether has mass you understand Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave. They are both waves in the aether. Perhaps you'll need to make aether much more complex, rather than "so simple it is ridiculous". For myself, it's that aether push of representing gravity that doesn't fly, because that makes molecular stuff as representing antigravity. There's another reason... It has to be explained how and why that "aether mass" does not generate heat through the atmosphere as it "drops" toward the ground to result in gravitation. The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid. By definition there is no loss of energy, as in heat, when an object interacts with a supersolid. No loss of energy? *That is very hard to imagine. *Please explain how space behaves similar to a "supersolid" and what precisely a supersolid is. There are those who would consider such a thing as a "supersolid" to be just a convenient invention that doesn't really exist. *After nearly fifty years, there is still no conclusive evidence for the existence of supersolids. Rather more likely that the spatial medium is comprised of subquark particles that regularly go between energetic and material states. *As this medium flows down through the atmosphere, there is no heat generated because the matter in the medium is not matter for but a short period before becoming pure energy again. On an atomic level, this medium flows into every atom of every material item it encounters. *This serves to rejuvenate each atom, to constantly replenish the forces of each atom. *The medium also flows on through the material items toward the major barycenter. *When it reaches the "center", it is then totally spent, for just enough space entered the material to replenish each atom. *Since this is a constant set of events, it first appears that the forces in each atom need no replenishment. *Space constantly replenishes the forces of each and every atom of matter it encounters. Gravitation is a byproduct of the above. *As space flows through a material object, it is similar to the flow of air through a windmill. It pushes down on the object and holds it in place, or it may push it closer to the barycenter and down to hit the ground. There is no reason for 'subquark particles'. Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. The 'flow' you refer to is the force exerted by the displaced aether toward and through the matter doing the displacing. The following article describes the aether as an incompressible fluid resulting in what the article refers to as gravitational aether caused by pressure (or vorticity). 'Phenomenology of Gravitational Aether as a solution to the Old Cosmological Constant Problem' http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3955 "One proposal to address this puzzle at the semi-classical level is to decouple quantum vacuum from space-time geometry via a modification of gravity that includes an incompressible fluid, known as Gravitational Aether. In this paper, we discuss classical predictions of this theory along with its compatibility with cosmological and experimental tests of gravity. We argue that deviations from General Relativity (GR) in this theory are sourced by pressure or vorticity." The following article describes gravity as a pressure exerted by aether toward matter. 'The aether-modified gravity and the G ?del metric' http://arxiv.org/pdf/1109.5654v2 "As for the pressure, it is equal to p = 53??g,6a2 so, it is positive if ?g 3 which is the weaker condition than the previous one. One notes that the results corresponding to the usual gravity are easily recovered. Also, it is easy to see that the interval ?g 15 corresponds to the usual matter." The following article describes a gravitating vacuum where aether is the quantum vacuum of the 21-st century. 'From Analogue Models to Gravitating Vacuum' http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.1155 "The aether of the 21-st century is the quantum vacuum, which is a new form of matter. This is the real substance" The following article describes what is presently postulated as dark matter is aether where the aether has mass. 'Quantum aether and an invariant Planck scale' http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3753 "this version of aether may have some bearing on the abundance of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in our universe." "mass of the aether" The following article describes what is presently postulated as dark matter is aether. 'Scalars, Vectors and Tensors from Metric-Affine Gravity' http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.5168 "the model obtained here gets closer to the aether theory of , which is shown therein to be an alternative to the cold dark matter." The following article describes the aether as superfluid dark matter. 'Unified model for dark matter and quintessence' http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0610135 "Superfluid dark matter is reminiscent of the aether and modeling the universe using superfluid aether is compatible." The following article describes the background field as the aether which is responsible for gravity. 'Vainshtein mechanism in Gauss-Bonnet gravity and Galileon aether' http://arxiv.org/pdf/1107.1892 "the perturbations of the scalar field do not propagate in the Minkowski space-time but rather in some form of ”aether” because of the presence of the background field" Each and every one of those proposals are speculation and nothing more, just like my idea. The sub-quarks are the quantum makeup of the Universe. They comprise space, they flow into matter and are a large part of the makeup of the matter. As Einstein pronounced, we are not objects "in space"; we are objects that are "spatially extended". We are an extension of space, and space is an extension of us. It is the flow of space into and through us that keeps our feet on the ground. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. -- Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "To live a creative life, you must lose your fear of being wrong." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 9, 3:13*pm, Painius wrote:
Each and every one of those proposals are speculation and nothing more, just like my idea. *The sub-quarks are the quantum makeup of the Universe. *They comprise space, they flow into matter and are a large part of the makeup of the matter. *As Einstein pronounced, we are not objects "in space"; we are objects that are "spatially extended". We are an extension of space, and space is an extension of us. *It is the flow of space into and through us that keeps our feet on the ground. *That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "To live a creative life, you must lose your fear of being wrong." The spatial extension is the state of displacement of the aether connected to and neighboring the matter doing the displacing. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On 11/9/2012 3:13 PM, Painius wrote:
"the perturbations of the scalar field do not propagate in the Minkowski space-time but rather in some form of â€aether†because of the presence of the background field" Each and every one of those proposals are speculation and nothing more, just like my idea. The sub-quarks are the quantum makeup of the Universe. They comprise space, they flow into matter and are a large part of the makeup of the matter. As Einstein pronounced, we are not objects "in space"; we are objects that are "spatially extended". We are an extension of space, and space is an extension of us. It is the flow of space into and through us that keeps our feet on the ground. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. At the end of the day all of this **** about spectral ether is absurd. Seriously, at no time do we ever have to make any adjustments to any calculations if you posit an ether. None. So why fix something that isn't broken? Please tell me why... -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. å˜äº® http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 9, 3:34*pm, HVAC wrote:
On 11/9/2012 3:13 PM, Painius wrote: "the perturbations of the scalar field do not propagate in the Minkowski space-time but rather in some form of ”aether” because of the presence of the background field" Each and every one of those proposals are speculation and nothing more, just like my idea. *The sub-quarks are the quantum makeup of the Universe. *They comprise space, they flow into matter and are a large part of the makeup of the matter. *As Einstein pronounced, we are not objects "in space"; we are objects that are "spatially extended". We are an extension of space, and space is an extension of us. *It is the flow of space into and through us that keeps our feet on the ground. *That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. At the end of the day all of this **** about spectral ether is absurd. Seriously, at no time do we ever have to make any adjustments to any calculations if you posit an ether. None. So why fix something that isn't broken? Please tell me why... So we can understand what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit experiment. Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether through both. So we can start to discuss what actually occurs physically in nature in a natural language. 'Quantum mechanics rule 'bent' in classic experiment' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13626587 'For his part, Professor Steinberg believes that the result reduces a limitation not on quantum physics but on physicists themselves. "I feel like we're starting to pull back a veil on what nature really is," he said. "The trouble with quantum mechanics is that while we've learned to calculate the outcomes of all sorts of experiments, we've lost much of our ability to describe what is really happening in any natural language. I think that this has really hampered our ability to make progress, to come up with new ideas and see intuitively how new systems ought to behave."' http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...inty-principle "Intriguingly, the trajectories closely match those predicted by an unconventional interpretation of quantum mechanics known as pilot-wave theory, in which each particle has a well-defined trajectory that takes it through one slit while the associated wave passes through both slits." A particle physically displaces the aether. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle enters and exits a single slit. It is the associated aether displacement wave which enters and exits both slits. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Strongly detecting the particle turns the associated aether wave into chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop and continues on the path it is traveling. What waves in a double slit experiment is the aether. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 1161 | March 11th 13 07:37 PM |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 9th 12 04:30 PM |
Experimental evidence aether has mass | mpc755 | Astronomy Misc | 4 | November 27th 10 01:50 PM |
Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass implies imaginary mass | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 1st 05 08:36 PM |