|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On 3/12/13 9:46 AM, Brad Guth wrote:
Your conditional laws of physics are noted, as is your faith-based Big Bang. Tests of Big Bang Cosmology The Big Bang Model is supported by a number of important observations, each of which are described in more detail on separate pages: 1. The expansion of the universe http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_exp.html Edwin Hubble's 1929 observation that galaxies were generally receding from us provided the first clue that the Big Bang theory might be right. 2. The abundance of the light elements H, He, Li http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_ele.html The Big Bang theory predicts that these light elements should have been fused from protons and neutrons in the first few minutes after the Big Bang. 3. The cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_cmb.html The early universe should have been very hot. The cosmic microwave background radiation is the remnant heat leftover from the Big Bang. These three measurable signatures strongly support the notion that the universe evolved from a dense, nearly featureless hot gas, just as the Big Bang model predicts. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On Mar 12, 7:49*am, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 3/12/13 9:46 AM, Brad Guth wrote: Your conditional laws of physics are noted, as is your faith-based Big Bang. * *Tests of Big Bang Cosmology * *The Big Bang Model is supported by a number of important * *observations, each of which are described in more detail * *on separate pages: * *1. The expansion of the universe *http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_exp.html * *Edwin Hubble's 1929 observation that galaxies were generally * *receding from us provided the first clue that the Big Bang * *theory might be right. * *2. The abundance of the light elements H, He, Li *http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_ele.html * *The Big Bang theory predicts that these light elements should * *have been fused from protons and neutrons in the first few * *minutes after the Big Bang. * *3. The cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation *http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_cmb.html * *The early universe should have been very hot. The cosmic * *microwave background radiation is the remnant heat leftover * *from the Big Bang. * *These three measurable signatures strongly support the notion * *that the universe evolved from a dense, nearly featureless * *hot gas, just as the Big Bang model predicts. Cosmic time is not relative to our extremely limited existence. You and others of your mainstream closed mindset kind can't even tell us what year Earth got its seasonal tilt or the Arctic ocean basin. In fact, you can't hardly explain anything of how humans even came to be. The only cosmic things proven lately is that the universe and our puny galaxy are anything but consistent or in any way unified. At least so far, there's not even an identical star to that of our sun. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 10:19:36 AM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
The only cosmic things proven lately is that the universe and our puny galaxy are anything but consistent or in any way unified. At least so far, there's not even an identical star to that of our sun. I guess this depends on your definition of 'identical', because there are many that are 'nearly identical', and it is just a matter of time before one is found... http://earthsky.org/space/the-sun-has-a-twin http://www.researchgate.net/publicat...ling_Our_S un http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...ble-Earth.html http://www.astrobio.net/pressrelease...ur-suns-sister http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/s...ar-to-Sun.html \Paul A |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On Mar 12, 5:32*pm, palsing wrote:
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 10:19:36 AM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote: The only cosmic things proven lately is that the universe and our puny galaxy are anything but consistent or in any way unified. *At least so far, there's not even an identical star to that of our sun. I guess this depends on your definition of 'identical', because there are many that are 'nearly identical', and it is just a matter of time before one is found... http://earthsky.org/space/the-sun-has-a-twin http://www.researchgate.net/publicat...618_A_Star_Clo... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...Habitable-worl... http://www.astrobio.net/pressrelease...ur-suns-sister http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/s...new-planets-fo... \Paul A Stars like our sun have come and gone billions if not trillions of times by now. Each and every stellar creation is one of a kind, unless intelligent design gets involved... |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
In article ,
Sam Wormley writes: The Big Bang Model is supported by a number of important observations, each of which are described in more detail on separate pages: No disagreement with the above, of course, nor the reasoning below that I've snipped. 1. The expansion of the universe http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_exp.html Edwin Hubble's 1929 observation that galaxies were generally receding from us... It was V. M. Slipher who provided the radial velocities, though Hubble is often incorrectly given credit. What Hubble actually provided were the galaxy _distances_. (The web page cited is correct if you read it carefully.) By plotting velocity against distance, Hubble discovered that recession speed is proportional to distance. -- Help keep our newsgroup healthy; please don't feed the trolls. Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123 Cambridge, MA 02138 USA |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
The Cooling of the Universe
On 3/15/13 5:21 PM, Steve Willner wrote:
In article , Sam Wormley writes: The Big Bang Model is supported by a number of important observations, each of which are described in more detail on separate pages: No disagreement with the above, of course, nor the reasoning below that I've snipped. 1. The expansion of the universe http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_exp.html Edwin Hubble's 1929 observation that galaxies were generally receding from us... It was V. M. Slipher who provided the radial velocities, though Hubble is often incorrectly given credit. What Hubble actually provided were the galaxy _distances_. (The web page cited is correct if you read it carefully.) By plotting velocity against distance, Hubble discovered that recession speed is proportional to distance. I agree. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Westchester, NY, Weather today, reports Twittering Fl Today | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 3 | April 21st 07 02:23 AM |
Westchester, NY, Weather today, reports Twittering Fl Today | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 3 | April 10th 07 10:04 PM |
Today | Christopher | Space Station | 0 | January 1st 05 01:51 PM |