#51
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 4, 5:17*am, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 4, 12:38*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Dec 3, 6:12*pm, mpc755 wrote: On Dec 3, 8:58*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Dec 3, 2:43*pm, mpc755 wrote: On Dec 3, 5:36*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Dec 3, 1:19*pm, mpc755 wrote: On Dec 3, 4:09*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Dec 3, 12:29*pm, mpc755 wrote: On Dec 3, 3:15*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Dec 3, 11:47*am, mpc755 wrote: On Dec 3, 2:16*pm, Brad Guth wrote: Wikipedia allows as much as you can offer, although making it stick as a front page theory or new interpretation rather than as a cranky rant sort of back page notation or link to an external page, is what takes persistence and a little help from your friends. *Do you have any friends? You should read the Wikipedia rules. They don't post new theories. Aether displaced by matter relating relativity and quantum mechanics is a new correct understanding of the physics of nature. You can create your very own Wikipedia page on this aether topic. Then eventually you can go back into other existing pages and edit a few of those to include a link to your personal Wikipedia page devoted to aether the way you interpret it. Once you have been proven as a reasonably good guy (usually this process takes a few weeks of yourself being positive and constructive to others), Wikipedia rules should allow you to directly edit other preexisting pages or topics. *Of course having an insider friend would make everything go much smoother. Do you have any such friends? If I create my own Wikipedia page having to do with aether displacement the page will be removed because aether displacement is a new theory and Wikipedia does not allow new theories to be posted on Wikipedia. Then place it as a novel idea or alternative notion that is supported by the research of all those other guys you keep harping about. *In other words, don't even bother to call it a new theory or even an improved one, but simply imply that it's an ongoing scientific interpretation of whatever's out there and that it could be responsible for gravity via its displacement. *You seem to have sufficient collaborating research that isn't entirely bogus to start with, so that alone makes your version of aether into a valid Wikipedia page, or at least worthy of becoming a footnote as an alternative to the existing theories. Of course aether could be simply loads of positrons, helium and those pesky photons with no place special to go. *But that's just my swag at it. Wikipedia does not allow new theories to be posted. Aether displacement is a new theory. Therefore, it will not be allowed to be posted on Wikipedia. Actually it's a very old theory, and what little there is of it does exist in Wikipedia. *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_theories *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_...cal_element%29 Just add your new and improved version to the pile, and be happy. Create a Wikipedia account, log in and edit or contribute whatever without intentionally ****ing everyone off. *You seem to be a nice enough person, so they shouldn't automatically reject nor otherwise banish whatever you have to share. Aether displacement is a new theory. But in order to get that message across, you'll have to step on a few thousand toes. Can't you even manage to create your own webpage or private Google Group that only you get to manage? Physics will eventually decide correctly understanding what occurs physically in nature is important in physics. "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it." / Max Planck There is evidence non-baryonic dark matter is not anchored to matter. This means mater moves through and displaces the aether. So, when is that interpretation getting into any of our K-12 textbooks? You are aware that not 0.1% of educated Americans even know about these public Usenet/newsgroups, and perhaps only 0.1% of those that know of these public newsgroups ever bother to contribute or interact by way of reading our stuff and offering feedback. That gets these Usenet/newsgroups down to an active audience or classroom of 300 out of 300 million, and the rest of the world is at least ten fold worse off. Don't you think we should at least try to fix that problem first? The Google Groups+ version of accessing Usenet/newsgroups and for creating personal newsgroups to suit, offers a number of interactive communications and publication solutions at little or no cost to those of us smart enough to tie their own shoelaces. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 1161 | March 11th 13 07:37 PM |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 196 | November 15th 12 02:11 PM |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | November 9th 12 08:43 PM |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 9th 12 04:30 PM |