Austin's Bob Mosley III Leads Vicious 'Shoot the 51-L Messenger' Campaign

In sci.space.policy John Maxson wrote:
Jon Berndt wrote in message
...

Mr. Maxson seemed plenty interested in throwing about
names when he thought it might help him.

More libel and defamation, I see. Is that all you can do?

Maybe you should conisder finding out what the terms "libel"
and "defmaion" actually mean? Becuase most of what you call
by them doesn't apepar to be.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)


--
Sander

+++ Out of cheese error +++

"Seemed," "when," "most," "appear?" Do you lame critics
ever do *anything* but hedge?

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)



Sander Vesik wrote in message
...
In sci.space.policy John Maxson wrote:
Jon Berndt wrote in message
...

Mr. Maxson seemed plenty interested in throwing about
names when he thought it might help him.

More libel and defamation, I see. Is that all you can do?

Maybe you should conisder finding out what the terms "libel"
and "defmaion" actually mean? Becuase most of what you call
by them doesn't apepar to be.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)


--
Sander

+++ Out of cheese error +++

Sci.space abuse is on topic for sci.space, until something
is done about it. That includes the abuse you contribute.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)


Sander Vesik wrote in message
...
In sci.space.policy John Maxson wrote:
"Seemed," "when," "most," "appear?" Do you lame critics
ever do *anything* but hedge?


As a matter of fact - 90% of what you post is not just compltete
rubbish, its downright braindead spamming of the newsgroups over
and over again with formulaic contentfree messages containing
accusations of libel and defamation at the top followed by
message text that has hardly anything to do with such claims or
with the newgroups these are being posted to.

So how about posting some posts that contain new material that
is actually on-topic for teh newsgroups or shutting up ? If there
is no content, there is nothing really to critisize, only to filter.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)


--
Sander

+++ Out of cheese error +++

My posts generally run along these lines:

http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=bf70kk%24i1h%241%40ins22.netins.net

..

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)


Scott M. Kozel wrote in message
...
"John Maxson" wrote:

Sci.space abuse is on topic for sci.space, until something
is done about it. That includes the abuse you contribute.

Maxson's apparently blind to the massive amounts of abuse
that HE contributes.

What took you so long, to continue whining for Mosley?

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)



Scott M. Kozel wrote in message
...
"John Maxson" wrote:

My posts generally run along these lines:

http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=bf70kk%24i1h%241%40ins22.netins.net

Oh, the deceptively attributed alleged missive, that you never would
answer my questions about, after about a dozen posts several weeks ago
where I requested you to do that.

Most of your posts are a whine the "abuse" you think you are subject to.


Scott M. Kozel wrote
"John Maxson" wrote:

Sci.space abuse is on topic for sci.space, until something
is done about it. That includes the abuse you contribute.

Maxson's apparently blind to the massive amounts of abuse
that HE contributes.

See? He tries to change the subject, again, rather than discuss the
attributions of the alleged missive.

"John Maxson" wrote:

What took you so long, to continue whining for Mosley?

Scott M. Kozel wrote
"John Maxson" wrote:

My posts generally run along these lines:

http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=bf70kk%24i1h%241%40ins22.netins.net

Oh, the deceptively attributed alleged missive, that you never would
answer my questions about, after about a dozen posts several weeks ago
where I requested you to do that.

The subject title hasn't changed. If you're reduced
to changing the subject, you should change the title.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)


Scott M. Kozel wrote
in message ...

See? He tries to change the subject, again, rather than discuss the
attributions of the alleged missive.

"John Maxson" wrote:

What took you so long, to continue whining for Mosley?

"John Maxson" wrote:

The subject title hasn't changed. If you're reduced
to changing the subject, you should change the title.

What difference would that make? You avoid inconvenient questions, no
matter what the thread header.

Oh, the deceptively attributed alleged missive, that you never would
answer my questions about, after about a dozen posts several weeks ago
where I requested you to do that.


Scott M. Kozel wrote

See? He tries to change the subject, again, rather than discuss the
attributions of the alleged missive.

In article , "Scott M. Kozel"
wrote:

See? He tries to change the subject, again, rather than discuss the
attributions of the alleged missive.

"John Maxson" wrote:

What took you so long, to continue whining for Mosley?

Face it--Maxson's a moron. You, I, and many other people have tried to
engage him in discussion in a rational fashion. However, failing to
agree absolutely with his lunacy, or daring to question his sources or
assumptions, draws nonsense such as you have experienced.

It is painfully clear that, while Maxson may have something worthwhile
to say, he is utterly unable to either explain or support his
contentions. This is a shame. Where he willing to actually engage in
discussion, instead of flapdoodle such as this thread, he might
contribute something truly worthwhile.

Moe

Moe Blues posts his frequent abuse
and defamation from Usenetserver.com.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)


Moe Blues wrote in message
...

Face it--Maxson's a moron. You, I, and many other people have tried to
engage him in discussion in a rational fashion. However, failing to
agree absolutely with his lunacy, or daring to question his sources or
assumptions, draws nonsense such as you have experienced.

It is painfully clear that, while Maxson may have something worthwhile
to say, he is utterly unable to either explain or support his
contentions. This is a shame. Where he willing to actually engage in
discussion, instead of flapdoodle such as this thread, he might
contribute something truly worthwhile.

Moe