|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Houston, You Have a Problem
On Jul 22, 8:38 am, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: "Danny Deger" wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 21, 7:24 pm, Jim Logajan wrote: "Danny Deger" wrote: P.S. You can find a copy of my transcripts at http://www.dannydeger.net/Documents/Transcripts.pdf I can see how taking "History of Witchcraft" would come in handy for engineering work. :-) It really was a good class. Great instructor. I learned the correct answer to this question, "How many accused witches were burned at the Salem witch trails?" Anybody know how many? Yes. Geesh, you took a class to learn it was zero? Congratulations, you win the prize!!! Danny Deger |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Houston, You Have a Problem
From Danny Dot:
On Jul 21, 7:20 pm, wrote: From Danny Dot: On Jul 21, 6:29 pm, B A R R Y wrote: I don't know why some feel the need to pick on spelling and grammar. I take this as a sign my story, complete with documentation is strong. They can't pick on the story, so they pick on the typos and such. My very first response gave specific feedback about failure to take accountability for personal decisions. There was a lot that I held back on (including spelling and grammar feedback), hoping that one clear cut example would serve as a touchstone for not only the rest of the paper, but your very attitude toward life. Last I checked, it was NASA officials that lied to the local officials to have me locked up. Please explain how I am accountable for them lying? Are you saying I decided to have them lie? Take a stab at them working with a local judge to deny me my due process for a hearing or an attorney. I missed the part where you explained my part in this was. Please refresh my memory. Don't forget the recent abuse of NASA sick leave policy I have provided documentation of. Please explain how I am accountable for that. Here's a direct quote from your text: "I made it a point to insult management at every opportunity I could. I knew this put me at risk." You declared war against the enemy you perceived, and now you are crying because they crushed you. My feedback to you was a plug to strive to recognize that which is beyond your control and to do your best to avoid those obstacles. I told you specific options you had available in following your flight lead on a base turn. Weeks before that I told you options available for energy management in landing the shuttle. In dealing with office problems at NASA, you had options there too. One excellent option that many people do in situations like your is to transfer to a different work group. You chose to fight the storm, and appear surprised to find that NASA is stronger than you. I am not addressing the right or wrong of your situation. Justice is a human concept. It relies on humans to uphold it. If those in authority and power do not share your perspective on justice, then there can be no expectation for it to be upheld. Your efforts toward justice will be wasted. I won't say that it was wrong of your flight lead to fly an aggressive final turn. Good pilots can get away with that. I won't say that it was wrong of you to follow your lead through that turn. A good wingman can get away with that too. My suggestion to you was to rethink your view that your flight lead was wrong. That your flight lead tried to kill you. And that you had no had no responsibility for your near-death experience. Ditto for everything that happened at NASA. Perhaps the saddest part of your story is that with a different attitude, NASA might have been happy to have taken you into their astronaut corps. ~ CT |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Houston, You Have a Problem
On Jul 22, 8:50 am, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: snip As for nitpicking the spelling, some of it is certainly in good humor. Especially my comment about you wanting to be given a brake (sic). There's a general rule on usenet that as soon as you critique someone's spelling or grammar a similar mistake will be found in your own post. I think you've created a corrallary of that rule that as soon as you try to defend a spelling or grammar mistake of your own, you'll make another. Yes, I did find my "Give me a break" post ironic. snip Hell, I have an ex-employee that I'm sure believes that I think he's incompetent and didn't appreciate his work. The reality, I think he was capable of great work and did appreciate much of his effort. But his approach wasn't mind and he never could fully understand why we butted heads. So, the reality is, the 'truth' is probably somewhere between what he thinks and what I think. So it the case in your story. Making a statement to local authorities I was "terrorizing all of NASA by threatening to come to their home and injure them if they don't all resign". Then being part of a local judge refusing to give me a hearing is hardly in the same category you are talking about here. There was no misunderstanding on my part. NASA officials performed these acts and they left a document trail. I do understand your concern that I might be in the middle of a big misunderstanding and I thank you for not throwing insults in my direction as you point this fact out. A great deal of what I write about in my book could be in this category, but not the abuse of power I describe above. Danny Deger |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Houston, You Have a Problem
On Jul 20, 7:34 pm, Brian Thorn wrote:
First, due to "space" being the medium "Unidentified Flying Objects" must transit from their home planet in order to attack (almost always sleepy or tipsy) people and probe their rectums on lonely country roads in the middle of the night, Not true, eh? I say it is, and I've got the hemorrhoids to prove it. Anyway, my microchip implant itches whenever I discuss the subject. Having worked in the government myself for a little while, the thought of govt people keeping a conspiracy secret for periods over, say, a month, is entirely absurd. Civil service life is dominated by the kind of lowbrow snottiness and vindictiveness that Danny documents so thoroughly. Any tidbit that can be used in the internecine wars will be used, no matter how important it might be to the nation as a whole. Dangerous Bill |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Houston, You Have a Problem
Jim Logajan wrote:
(Derek Lyons) wrote: He didn't say "nothing can be told" he said "nothing can be told about your ability to teach". This is all so pointlessly confrontational and typical Usenet arguing wherein rigor is applied when it serves a personal end and tossed aside when it doesn't. ROTFL. It's very amusing when you accuse me of that, and then turn around and indulge in it yourself. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Houston, You Have a Problem
On Jul 22, 11:10 am, wrote:
snip Here's a direct quote from your text: "I made it a point to insult management at every opportunity I could. I knew this put me at risk." You declared war against the enemy you perceived, and now you are crying because they crushed you. You understand the situation exactly. They did crush me but violated many laws to do it. Lying to local officials and being part of denying due process is not something a government agency should do. I am now in the process of fighting back by exposing their gross misconduct. snip You chose to fight the storm, and appear surprised to find that NASA is stronger than you. Surprise is not one of my emotions. Anger yes, surprise no. When I was locked up in 1999, I knew I had declared open warfare with the Johnson Space Center Director, George Abbey. Part of me was quite impressed that he could silence me by having me locked up. I knew my lockup was illegal, and I knew the local authorities would tend to support Abbey over me. I was afraid I could not even trust the local judges. I was right. Documentation now proves a local judge was behaving improperly. No, I am not surprised NASA is stronger than me. BUT I AM MAD AS HELL AND I AM NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE :-) I am not addressing the right or wrong of your situation. Justice is a human concept. It relies on humans to uphold it. If those in authority and power do not share your perspective on justice, then there can be no expectation for it to be upheld. Your efforts toward justice will be wasted. You may be right. In fact you are probably right. My only hope for justice is to get my story, complete with documentation, exposed in the press. I have found that the people in power support the other people in power. I won't say that it was wrong of your flight lead to fly an aggressive final turn. Good pilots can get away with that. I won't say that it was wrong of you to follow your lead through that turn. A good wingman can get away with that too. My suggestion to you was to rethink your view that your flight lead was wrong. That your flight lead tried to kill you. Where in the heck did I say he wanted to kill me? Please don't put words in my mouth. I only said he wanted to embarrass me by flying a turn tighter than I could. He did not know, and I did not know the consequences of flying into his jet wash. If I had known, I certainly would not have. If he had known, he certainly would not have flown such a tight turn that I had to follow. But I thank you for not throwing random insults at me in your posts. I enjoyed reading actually. You have good insight on the situation, Danny Deger |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Houston, You Have a Problem
wrote in message
ups.com... Wow, Greg. For a person who typically does a decent job with post structure, there were enough glaring mistakes in your reply to make me wonder whether you did it intentionally. Ha! chance = change corrallary = corollary corrobarated = corroborated worse = worst intepretation = interpretation mind = mine Wow, yeah that is bad. I guess it proves the rule. :-) ~ CT From Greg Moo "Derek Lyons" wrote in message ... wrote: On Jul 21, 6:29 pm, B A R R Y wrote: I don't know why some feel the need to pick on spelling and grammar. I take this as a sign my story, complete with documentation is strong. They can't pick on the story, so they pick on the typos and such. ROTFLMAO. Don't worry Derek, I'm sure all the lurkers support him. :-) Seriously, Danny, I have not read your book. When I get a chance I may. However, the problem is, based on your other comments here, I, like others have already formed opinions in regards to you and your credibility. Whether your book can chance that remains to be seen. As for nitpicking the spelling, some of it is certainly in good humor. Especially my comment about you wanting to be given a brake (sic). There's a general rule on usenet that as soon as you critique someone's spelling or grammar a similar mistake will be found in your own post. I think you've created a corrallary of that rule that as soon as you try to defend a spelling or grammar mistake of your own, you'll make another. Also, whether you like it or not, there is nothing you can post that proves your story. For the completely cynical, all the documentation you're posting could be made up. That's the worse case scenario in a sense. I'm not accusing you of that, but simply pointing out that your documentation can't by itself prove anything since it can't be independently corrobarated. It can only suggest and imply. Again, I repeat my suggestion, if you really truly believe you have a case, get an investigative writer to help you and to do some of their own research. In addition, unfortunately for your case, the excerpts you've posted previously do seem to indicate a "I TOLD THEM and no one listened." (and no, I'm not referring to the meetings and lock you're referring to.) Which may be completely true, or may be your intepretation of events. Hell, I have an ex-employee that I'm sure believes that I think he's incompetent and didn't appreciate his work. The reality, I think he was capable of great work and did appreciate much of his effort. But his approach wasn't mind and he never could fully understand why we butted heads. So, the reality is, the 'truth' is probably somewhere between what he thinks and what I think. So it the case in your story. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Houston, You Have a Problem
Danny Deger wrote:
You posted no documents that confirm gross misconduct on the part of NASA management. Here is the one proving NASA (Jackie Reese) lied to my doctors to have me locked up http://dannydeger.net/Documents/Rees...%20Doctors.pdf No, that is your _claim_ that she lied. It is however very interesting documentation of your bullying her. Here is the documenting my actual behavior in this time period. http://dannydeger.net/Documents/Jeff%20Bertsch's%20Comments%20on%20Danny%20Deger.h tm If I accept is as gospel truth (as you wish me to) it doesn't place you in a very positive light. Uncontrolled outbursts? Ongoing displays of anger? It's all in there. Here is the one documenting NASA acted with a local judge to have my due process denied. http://dannydeger.net/Documents/Rees...of%20Venue.pdf It's fascinating that the same spelling errors you make such light of here on Usenet occur right in the opening of this legal document. I smell a pattern. At any rate - you seem to have failed to note that (as I interpret the document) the facility you were being treated at is _in_ Galveston County. Here is the one proving Vanessa Bowen, a Human Resources Representative, presented herself as a medical professional to my doctor http://dannydeger.net/Documents/Stone%20Bowen.pdf I see no evidence whatsoever that she claimed to be a medical professional. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Houston, You Have a Problem
On Jul 22, 12:03 pm, (Derek Lyons) wrote:
Danny Deger wrote: You posted no documents that confirm gross misconduct on the part of NASA management. Here is the one proving NASA (Jackie Reese) lied to my doctors to have me locked up http://dannydeger.net/Documents/Rees...%20Doctors.pdf No, that is your _claim_ that she lied. It is however very interesting documentation of your bullying her. The claim of a lie is proven by the there being no mention of making homicidal threats in the documentation generated by my management. The two documents go hand in hand to prove the lie to local officials. Here is the documenting my actual behavior in this time period. http://dannydeger.net/Documents/Jeff%20Bertsch's%20Comments%20on%20Da... If I accept is as gospel truth (as you wish me to) it doesn't place you in a very positive light. Uncontrolled outbursts? Ongoing displays of anger? I will plea guilty to being angry and showing it. But where is the statements I had made threats to come to people's home and injure them if they don't resign. This document is obviously a very detailed account of my actions the summer of 1999, If I did make homicidal threats to my coworkers, as claimed by Jackie Reese in the first document, these threats would be documented here. It's all in there. Here is the one documenting NASA acted with a local judge to have my due process denied. http://dannydeger.net/Documents/Rees...of%20Venue.pdf It's fascinating that the same spelling errors you make such light of here on Usenet occur right in the opening of this legal document. I smell a pattern. You smell a pattern that I am a bad typist? I plead guilty of that charge. At any rate - you seem to have failed to note that (as I interpret the document) the facility you were being treated at is _in_ Galveston County. Here is the one proving Vanessa Bowen, a Human Resources Representative, presented herself as a medical professional to my doctor http://dannydeger.net/Documents/Stone%20Bowen.pdf I see no evidence whatsoever that she claimed to be a medical professional. It is the opening statement that Ms. Bowen claimed to be part of EAP, the Employee Assistance Program. But I do thank for keeping the thread on track. Just one small divergence to my poor typing skills. Not bad overall. Danny Deger |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Houston, You Have a Problem
From Danny Dot:
On Jul 22, 11:10 am, wrote: snip Here's a direct quote from your text: "I made it a point to insult management at every opportunity I could. I knew this put me at risk." You declared war against the enemy you perceived, and now you are crying because they crushed you. You understand the situation exactly. They did crush me but violated many laws to do it. Lying to local officials and being part of denying due process is not something a government agency should do. I am now in the process of fighting back by exposing their gross misconduct. snip You chose to fight the storm, and appear surprised to find that NASA is stronger than you. Surprise is not one of my emotions. Anger yes, surprise no. When I was locked up in 1999, I knew I had declared open warfare with the Johnson Space Center Director, George Abbey. Part of me was quite impressed that he could silence me by having me locked up. I knew my lockup was illegal, and I knew the local authorities would tend to support Abbey over me. I was afraid I could not even trust the local judges. I was right. Documentation now proves a local judge was behaving improperly. No, I am not surprised NASA is stronger than me. BUT I AM MAD AS HELL AND I AM NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE :-) I am not addressing the right or wrong of your situation. Justice is a human concept. It relies on humans to uphold it. If those in authority and power do not share your perspective on justice, then there can be no expectation for it to be upheld. Your efforts toward justice will be wasted. You may be right. In fact you are probably right. My only hope for justice is to get my story, complete with documentation, exposed in the press. I have found that the people in power support the other people in power. I won't say that it was wrong of your flight lead to fly an aggressive final turn. Good pilots can get away with that. I won't say that it was wrong of you to follow your lead through that turn. A good wingman can get away with that too. My suggestion to you was to rethink your view that your flight lead was wrong. That your flight lead tried to kill you. Where in the heck did I say he wanted to kill me? Please don't put words in my mouth. I only said he wanted to embarrass me by flying a turn tighter than I could. He did not know, and I did not know the consequences of flying into his jet wash. If I had known, I certainly would not have. If he had known, he certainly would not have flown such a tight turn that I had to follow. But I thank you for not throwing random insults at me in your posts. I enjoyed reading actually. You have good insight on the situation, My bad about that part of your final turn story. I remember reading somewhere in your story about someone trying to kill you and I must have gotten that crossed. I jumped in on this thread in hopes that I could add something that helps. I'm sure that there are lots of people who are faced with problems of this type. Not much fun. ~ CT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Houston, You Have a Problem | Danny Deger | Space Shuttle | 101 | July 25th 07 12:07 AM |
Houston, You Have a Problem | Danny Deger | Space Shuttle | 9 | July 21st 07 02:42 AM |
Houston, we have a problem. | GatherNoMoss | Policy | 72 | February 23rd 07 06:41 PM |
"Houston, we've got a problem" | jjustwwondering | Policy | 0 | March 7th 04 08:38 AM |
Newsweek CW column: Houston, YOU'RE the problem. | ElleninLosAngeles | Space Shuttle | 2 | September 3rd 03 01:29 PM |