|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Black holes disproven Now
Well here's SR 101:
cos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=1 1/sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=c Electromagnetic red and blue shi[f]t. Then gravitational black and white shift: sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=z 1/sin(sgn(v)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(d)csc(z))=g Which give us the Schartzchild radius and the Godel radius of any black hole not virutal, quantum, or constant rate: (t_1^2g/d)/z+z/(t_2^2g/d)-z+g=0-d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2!d_S=vt_1=(d_G=vt_2|d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2) for-each z=m, d_G:Godel radius, and d_S=Schartzchild radius For which information exists in the partial differential: dz/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z)=0 dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z)=c Therefo lim z-0 lim m-0 f(z)+f(m)-f'(z)/mz=v, sqrt(v+z^2)=(2dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))^1/3+sqrt(c/micro*eplison),(m-z) The black hole evaporates before anything is destroyed. Yet this information is not in a black hole. To get out this information must exist be symmetric, to enter the Schwartchild radius, it must be in duplex parity with the Godel radius or the event horizon will collapse the star of its planet of origin (even within one light year which is the maximum to any planet in the Milky Way). This is known as hyper-conductivity. Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" Cyberneticist http://www.usag-ac.info "BURT" wrote in message ... The energy shift to light revealed in Pound Rebka means infinite energy shift to light for black hole horizons. Incoming light goes infinitely blue shifted or infinitely energetic. While outgoing light gets infinitely red shifted to zero energy. Both these predictions for light's energy at any event horizon are nonsense and disproves their existence. Mitch Raemsch; Falling light changes colour |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Black holes disproven Now
Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote:
Well here's SR 101: cos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=1 1/sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=c Electromagnetic red and blue shi[f]t. Then gravitational black and white shift: sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=z 1/sin(sgn(v)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(d)csc(z))=g Which give us the Schartzchild radius and the Godel radius of any black hole not virutal, quantum, or constant rate: (t_1^2g/d)/z+z/(t_2^2g/d)-z+g=0-d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2!d_S=vt_1=(d_G=vt_2|d_S= vt_1-d_G=vt_2) for-each z=m, d_G:Godel radius, and d_S=Schartzchild radius For which information exists in the partial differential: dz/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v )csc(z)=0 dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v )csc(z)=c Therefo lim z-0 lim m-0 f(z)+f(m)-f'(z)/mz=v, sqrt(v+z^2)=(2dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z) |)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))^1/3+sqrt(c/micro*eplison),(m-z) The black hole evaporates before anything is destroyed. Yet this information is not in a black hole. To get out this information must exist be symmetric, to enter the Schwartchild radius, it must be in duplex parity with the Godel radius or the event horizon will collapse the star of its planet of origin (even within one light year which is the maximum to any planet in the Milky Way). This is known as hyper-conductivity. Wow! Here is SR debunking 101 The clock malfunctioned and your ruler is rubber. One line, I win. Think about that, or forever be the history repeating dingalings that do not know how to properly time things nor how to measure distance in science. -- James M Driscoll Jr Spaceman |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Black holes disproven Now
On Jun 23, 5:02*am, "Spaceman"
wrote: Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote: Well here's SR 101: cos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=1 1/sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=c Electromagnetic red and blue shi[f]t. *Then gravitational black and white shift: sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=z 1/sin(sgn(v)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(d)csc(z))=g Which give us the Schartzchild radius and the Godel radius of any black hole not virutal, quantum, or constant rate: (t_1^2g/d)/z+z/(t_2^2g/d)-z+g=0-d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2!d_S=vt_1=(d_G=vt_2|d_S*= vt_1-d_G=vt_2) for-each z=m, d_G:Godel radius, and d_S=Schartzchild radius For which information exists in the partial differential: dz/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(*v )csc(z)=0 dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(*v )csc(z)=c Therefo lim z-0 lim m-0 f(z)+f(m)-f'(z)/mz=v, sqrt(v+z^2)=(2dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z*) |)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))^1/3+sqrt(c/micro*eplison),(m-z) The black hole evaporates before anything is destroyed. *Yet this information is not in a black hole. *To get out this information must exist be symmetric, to enter the Schwartchild radius, it must be in duplex parity with the Godel radius or the event horizon will collapse the star of its planet of origin (even within one light year which is the maximum to any planet in the Milky Way). *This is known as hyper-conductivity. Wow! Here is SR debunking 101 The clock malfunctioned and your ruler is rubber. One line, I win. Think about that, or forever be the history repeating dingalings that do not know how to properly time things nor how to measure distance in science. -- James M Driscoll Jr Spaceman- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - At the center of a mass gravity dops to zero therefore there is no gravity inside a black hole. If there were gravity inside a black hole it would push matter first at the speed of light and then faster past the speed of light inside. Black holes are disproven in that they make nonsense predictions. Mitch Raemsch |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Black holes disproven Now
And then, we'll... OK hardon, here's one, try thinking linearly before you
corrupt my document off whatever whimsical Wangian Eurpium normalization becomes the next blacklist. LINK: http://www.usag-ac.info/cgi-bin/view.cgi?id=326 I'll have to correct this as for all those exiles, don't keep us tuned by such disinformation. Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" Cyberneticist http://www.usag-ac.info wrote in message ... On Jun 23, 5:02 am, "Spaceman" wrote: Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote: Well here's SR 101: cos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=1 1/sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=c Electromagnetic red and blue shi[f]t. Then gravitational black and white shift: sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=z 1/sin(sgn(v)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(d)csc(z))=g Which give us the Schartzchild radius and the Godel radius of any black hole not virutal, quantum, or constant rate: (t_1^2g/d)/z+z/(t_2^2g/d)-z+g=0-d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2!d_S=vt_1=(d_G=vt_2|d_S*= vt_1-d_G=vt_2) for-each z=m, d_G:Godel radius, and d_S=Schartzchild radius For which information exists in the partial differential: dz/dcos(sgn(s)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(w)csc(z)))dsin(sgn(s)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(*v )csc(z)=0 dm/dcos(sgn(s)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(w)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(s)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(*v )csc(z)=c Therefo lim z-0 lim m-0 f(z)+f(m)-f'(z)/mz=v, sqrt(v+z^2)=(2dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z*) |)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))^1/3+sqrt(c/micro*eplison),(m-z) The black hole evaporates before anything is destroyed. Yet this information is not in a black hole. To get out this information must exist be symmetric, to enter the Schwartchild radius, it must be in duplex parity with the Godel radius or the event horizon will collapse the star of its planet of origin (even within one light year which is the maximum to any planet in the Milky Way). This is known as hyper-conductivity. Wow! Here is SR debunking 101 The clock malfunctioned and your ruler is rubber. One line, I win. Think about that, or forever be the history repeating dingalings that do not know how to properly time things nor how to measure distance in science. -- James M Driscoll Jr Spaceman- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - At the center of a mass gravity dops to zero therefore there is no gravity inside a black hole. If there were gravity inside a black hole it would push matter first at the speed of light and then faster past the speed of light inside. Black holes are disproven in that they make nonsense predictions. Mitch Raemsch |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Black holes disproven Now
Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote:
And then, we'll... OK hardon, here's one, try thinking linearly before you corrupt my document off whatever whimsical Wangian Eurpium normalization becomes the next blacklist. LINK: http://www.usag-ac.info/cgi-bin/view.cgi?id=326 I'll have to correct this as for all those exiles, don't keep us tuned by such disinformation. Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" Cyberneticist http://www.usag-ac.info Relativists can not think linearly without sucking on thier "transform" lollipops. -- James M Driscoll Jr Spaceman |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Black holes disproven Now
On Jun 22, 11:34 pm, "Patrick Meuser-Bianca" pmeuser-bia...@usag-
ac.info wrote: Well here's SR 101: cos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=1 1/sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=c Electromagnetic red and blue shi[f]t. Then gravitational black and white shift: sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=z 1/sin(sgn(v)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(d)csc(z))=g Which give us the Schartzchild radius and the Godel radius of any black hole not virutal, quantum, or constant rate: (t_1^2g/d)/z+z/(t_2^2g/d)-z+g=0-d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2!d_S=vt_1=(d_G=vt_2|d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2) for-each z=m, d_G:Godel radius, and d_S=Schartzchild radius For which information exists in the partial differential: dz/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z)=0 dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z)=c Therefo lim z-0 lim m-0 f(z)+f(m)-f'(z)/mz=v, sqrt(v+z^2)=(2dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))^1/3+sqrt(c/micro*eplison),(m-z) The black hole evaporates before anything is destroyed. Yet this information is not in a black hole. To get out this information must exist be symmetric, to enter the Schwartchild radius, it must be in duplex parity with the Godel radius or the event horizon will collapse the star of its planet of origin (even within one light year which is the maximum to any planet in the Milky Way). This is known as hyper-conductivity. Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" Cyberneticisthttp://www.usag-ac.info "BURT" wrote in message ... The energy shift to light revealed in Pound Rebka means infinite energy shift to light for black hole horizons. Incoming light goes infinitely blue shifted or infinitely energetic. While outgoing light gets infinitely red shifted to zero energy. Both these predictions for light's energy at any event horizon are nonsense and disproves their existence. Mitch Raemsch; Falling light changes colour Where's our public owned supercomputer simulations? (or don't the regular laws of physics apply?) - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Black holes disproven Now
On Jun 23, 3:05 pm, wrote:
On Jun 23, 5:02 am, "Spaceman" wrote: Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote: Well here's SR 101: cos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=1 1/sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=c Electromagnetic red and blue shi[f]t. Then gravitational black and white shift: sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=z 1/sin(sgn(v)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(d)csc(z))=g Which give us the Schartzchild radius and the Godel radius of any black hole not virutal, quantum, or constant rate: (t_1^2g/d)/z+z/(t_2^2g/d)-z+g=0-d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2!d_S=vt_1=(d_G=vt_2|d_S*= vt_1-d_G=vt_2) for-each z=m, d_G:Godel radius, and d_S=Schartzchild radius For which information exists in the partial differential: dz/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(*v )csc(z)=0 dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(*v )csc(z)=c Therefo lim z-0 lim m-0 f(z)+f(m)-f'(z)/mz=v, sqrt(v+z^2)=(2dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z*) |)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))^1/3+sqrt(c/micro*eplison),(m-z) The black hole evaporates before anything is destroyed. Yet this information is not in a black hole. To get out this information must exist be symmetric, to enter the Schwartchild radius, it must be in duplex parity with the Godel radius or the event horizon will collapse the star of its planet of origin (even within one light year which is the maximum to any planet in the Milky Way). This is known as hyper-conductivity. Wow! Here is SR debunking 101 The clock malfunctioned and your ruler is rubber. One line, I win. Think about that, or forever be the history repeating dingalings that do not know how to properly time things nor how to measure distance in science. -- James M Driscoll Jr Spaceman- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - At the center of a mass gravity dops to zero therefore there is no gravity inside a black hole. If there were gravity inside a black hole it would push matter first at the speed of light and then faster past the speed of light inside. Black holes are disproven in that they make nonsense predictions. Mitch Raemsch A zero gravity black hole interior seems doable. At least a reverse- gravity BH core seems entirely logical. Perhaps the black looking shell or sphere of a given BH is merely a weird crust or layer of antimatter. - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Black holes disproven Now
So's local connectionism, the problem exists when there is a relative supply
of energy and there is any disinformation the equivalent mass of its equivalent matter, there' alot from absolute zero to about one degree kelvin that reflects this range, the exchange of heat for example in LaPlacian entropy gives us much more than the Lwas of Thermodynamics as for Boyle and Hooke, the 'spring' as you see is the recoil into such relativity as to each locality where there is a critical density of heat and a critical volume of plasma, these do not consist energy. The energy expended into a reaction is the same mass of its reactant times the velocity of such matter about it and one half of that is the knowledge. Such notion of knowledge then did not exist. So is the conceptual equivalent of local connectionism to such information that doesn't either anymore than what does not have knowledge http://www.nytimes.com, there'd be report to the reform of physics that this is allways as for what does not inform us as to the relationships that had pre-existed to the momentum that such a statement, "energy can be neither creat or destroyed" means the same oversights for what understandings were prevented so then what energy was vented for every pre-existent creation subtract all the shading to an understandable recovery in such mass that reflects the difference, as past values would show the same sort of patterns as the last resort of what we see now. Its a pity such a subject is so disinformative. It's a damn crying shame that anyone would want to capitalize an intangible subject like a person, yet all the information relative to a person, has this power in which its use becomes its misuse. That's what limits entropy and increases disease, as those who've been committed against there will into technology for the proposition of precessive acts that such phenomenon are indicative of people who don't know their birth-time. See CPH Theory, even Hosein Javadi states a black hole is born, yet not to this antic, even now these trends subsist to what could be a stable incorproation of day-care for the stabilization of such terrain for the reclamation of these media in conjunction with the layering of the twenty seven dimensional momentum to return the moon to its original orbit (as the proper techniques for these sort of operations have been unsigned and linked to unauthorized access as so many connected to fanandemics of misporportional certainty that we can safely say that there is no discrete systems in linear space--linear time is the result of these decommissions, as, less roll operations in existing software that is so relative the hardware in order to inflict non-linear time for co-efficient exlcusions. How so this does come to pass as even what ages have become the divide of a greater repositorry for such 'repugnant' practices as the basis for the deforestation where these snakes lie as like now, the ciritical mass resists, for whatever plots on the territories of a fuure's market that reflects each and every practice to get the whole contingent in this time, back to where they came from as for the proclamation of universal law and whateveer contradictions such information services claim are critical. Brain washing. We'd see a return to Mars by the bounded ranging of this very message the same as a map to get to Deimos, but whoso the relationship between my progress and the means to effect is destruction continues to be so evident. BTW, a hardon is a particle to the rise of Atlantis, by the time we reognize it as the eight wonder of the world, there'd be that much less ocean to walk on it. These targets for magnetic polar anti-tangets are the culprits as is the magnetic reflection of hyper-conductivity. It complements coolons that have curled the same neural information into genetic helixes and strands that such lands suite as for the accounting of all murderons and burnons in the development of para-forcal systems to these techlogies that have been built to unsigned and unauthorized practices or respects, could what the difference be to replace them... Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" Cyberneticist http://www.usag-ac.info "Spaceman" wrote in message ... Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote: And then, we'll... OK hardon, here's one, try thinking linearly before you corrupt my document off whatever whimsical Wangian Eurpium normalization becomes the next blacklist. LINK: http://www.usag-ac.info/cgi-bin/view.cgi?id=326 I'll have to correct this as for all those exiles, don't keep us tuned by such disinformation. Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" Cyberneticist http://www.usag-ac.info Relativists can not think linearly without sucking on thier "transform" lollipops. -- James M Driscoll Jr Spaceman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Black holes not black after all (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 17th 08 06:31 AM |
Black holes not black after all (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee[_1_] | News | 0 | May 16th 08 02:37 AM |
Black holes: Saddam holes | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 7 | May 14th 06 05:10 AM |
Black Holes Aren't So Black (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 2 | October 5th 05 10:57 PM |
Black Holes Aren't So Black (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | October 3rd 05 03:49 PM |