A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Musk plans for mars



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 1st 16, 11:54 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default Musk plans for mars

On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 3:41:42 PM UTC-4, JF Mezei wrote:
Musk outlined some plans for mars colonisation. He says the plan is to
bring transport costs down by many orders of magnitudes so that the
ticket prices are closer to the cost of a home (so paople can move to
Mars easily).

Musk plans to build mega rocket (bigger than Saturn 5) with 100
passengers per trip. Musk looking at expanding to 200. Plan is to send 1
million people to Mars.
Rocket should have ~10,000(t) compared to Saturn 5 ~3000 (t)

Stage 1 would have 128MN of thurst at sea level, 42 Raptor engines.

Landing the stage 1 back would cost about 7% of fuel. (down from current
use).

Of the 42 engines, 7 in the centre would be gimballed, the rest would be
fixed.


450 tonnes of cargo to Mars. Trip time caries betwene 80 and 140 days
depending on year/planet alignment.



To achieve this, there are some concepts that need to be implemented:

Full reusability
Since it takes so long for the return trip, Musk says about 12 re-uses
for the interplanetary ship lasting about 20-30 years.

In-orbit refuelling
The interplanetary ship is launched without fuel, orbits earth after
launch. Second launch bring up fuel, docks to the first ship to transfer
fuel and then interplanetary ship departs.

Tanker version of spacecraft will launch 3 to 5 times to transfer enough
fuel for each interplanetary ship and for each launch window, there
would be many interplanetary ship launched and fueled (so the launch pad
would be busy launching them and the refueling ones.

Produce propellant on Mars
Loading propellant on earth for the return trip from mars costs way too
much.

Right choice of propellant
This one is simple: methane. Hydrogen could also be produced on mars but
very hard to store and requires much bigger tanks.


Musk wants to R&D so that carbon fibre can be used for tanks.


  #2  
Old October 3rd 16, 12:59 AM posted to sci.space.policy
William Mook[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,840
Default Musk plans for mars

I think with his two stage RLV design 400 tons is more achievable, but if he can get his structure fraction down to 3.5% from 4.2% - he can get another 50 tons out of the deal.

They will likely go to Mars in stasis, in large fleets orbited over the entire synodic period. That way capital utilisation is maximised. Meanwhile, 'live' crews - mostly doctors - visit those in stasis. They're awakened on a schedule every 28 days - and surgeries cosmetic and other can be scheduled as well. People spend a day or two in awakened state - and assessed physically and psychologically. In this way over a 90 day to 120 day trip - people can enjoy a very fine luxury experience - at minimal cost in terms of weight or money.

http://www.sei.aero/eng/papers/uploa...2010162015.pdf

This was presented at the 66th IAF conference - and Musk was there. Just saying.

200 t - 300 kW - 100 people. So, 400 t 600 kW - 200 people - is his payload.



On Sunday, October 2, 2016 at 11:54:41 AM UTC+13, bob haller wrote:
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 3:41:42 PM UTC-4, JF Mezei wrote:
Musk outlined some plans for mars colonisation. He says the plan is to
bring transport costs down by many orders of magnitudes so that the
ticket prices are closer to the cost of a home (so paople can move to
Mars easily).

Musk plans to build mega rocket (bigger than Saturn 5) with 100
passengers per trip. Musk looking at expanding to 200. Plan is to send 1
million people to Mars.
Rocket should have ~10,000(t) compared to Saturn 5 ~3000 (t)

Stage 1 would have 128MN of thurst at sea level, 42 Raptor engines.

Landing the stage 1 back would cost about 7% of fuel. (down from current
use).

Of the 42 engines, 7 in the centre would be gimballed, the rest would be
fixed.


450 tonnes of cargo to Mars. Trip time caries betwene 80 and 140 days
depending on year/planet alignment.



To achieve this, there are some concepts that need to be implemented:

Full reusability
Since it takes so long for the return trip, Musk says about 12 re-uses
for the interplanetary ship lasting about 20-30 years.

In-orbit refuelling
The interplanetary ship is launched without fuel, orbits earth after
launch. Second launch bring up fuel, docks to the first ship to transfer
fuel and then interplanetary ship departs.

Tanker version of spacecraft will launch 3 to 5 times to transfer enough
fuel for each interplanetary ship and for each launch window, there
would be many interplanetary ship launched and fueled (so the launch pad
would be busy launching them and the refueling ones.

Produce propellant on Mars
Loading propellant on earth for the return trip from mars costs way too
much.

Right choice of propellant
This one is simple: methane. Hydrogen could also be produced on mars but
very hard to store and requires much bigger tanks.


Musk wants to R&D so that carbon fibre can be used for tanks.

  #3  
Old October 3rd 16, 06:21 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Fred J. McCall[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,018
Default Musk plans for mars

William Mook wrote:

I think with his two stage RLV design 400 tons is more achievable, but if he can get his structure fraction down to 3.5% from 4.2% - he can get another 50 tons out of the deal.


You have no idea what his actual structure fraction will be, so so far
you're just pulling numbers out of your ass.


They will likely go to Mars in stasis, in large fleets orbited over the entire synodic period. That way capital utilisation is maximised. Meanwhile, 'live' crews - mostly doctors - visit those in stasis. They're awakened on a schedule every 28 days - and surgeries cosmetic and other can be scheduled as well. People spend a day or two in awakened state - and assessed physically and psychologically. In this way over a 90 day to 120 day trip - people can enjoy a very fine luxury experience - at minimal cost in terms of weight or money.


Except that's not what he says he's going to do or how he says it will
work. Musk plans on sending people long before 'stasis' is ready.

Perhaps you should let Musk talk for Musk and stop making **** up?


http://www.sei.aero/eng/papers/uploa...2010162015.pdf

This was presented at the 66th IAF conference - and Musk was there. Just saying.


Except he was detailing things about his vision for Mars long before
that conference. No doubt lots of things were presented that he'll
make no use of at all.


200 t - 300 kW - 100 people. So, 400 t 600 kW - 200 people - is his payload.


Numbers straight from Mookie's ass.


--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Musk plans for mars Jeff Findley[_6_] Policy 54 October 12th 16 08:57 PM
Musk and Mars Greg \(Strider\) Moore Policy 15 July 5th 14 05:59 AM
Musk and Mars Robert Clark[_4_] Astronomy Misc 1 June 30th 14 03:40 PM
Musk lays out plans for reusability of the Falcon 9 rocket Jeff Findley[_2_] Policy 4 January 5th 14 07:13 PM
Elon Musk and Mars Greg \(Strider\) Moore Policy 19 August 3rd 13 06:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.