No Dirt Could Exist On U.S. Flags On The Moon

Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
the flag to adhere any“dirt” to the flag.

Ref. 1:
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627377 http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627515

Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Examina...nce_of_ stars
Quote from Ref. 2:“In the Apollo 11 press conference, Neil Armstrong
states that he was "never able to see stars from the lunar surface or
on the daylight side of the moon by eye" [6] Stars were visible with
the naked eye only when they were in the shadow of the Moon. All of
the landings were in daylight.[7]”

Ref. 3:
http://www.space.com/14725-moon-temp...ays-night.html
Quote from Ref. 3: “Temperatures on the moon are very hot in the
daytime, about 100 degrees Centigrade. A single "day" on the moon
lasts about 28 Earth days, meaning the lunar daytime is nearly two
Earth weeks long.”

Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

In article ,
says...

Wretch Fossil wrote:

Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
the flag to adhere any?dirt? to the flag.

Static charge from solar wind. We're done here.

Agreed. The lunar dust stuck to the EVA suits so badly that the wear
and tear was starting to really tear up the outer coverings.

Jeff
--
" Ares 1 is a prime example of the fact that NASA just can't get it
up anymore... and when they can, it doesn't stay up long. "
- tinker

Wretch Fossil writes:

Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
the flag to adhere any“dirt� to the flag.

Read some things up. Static charge let dust cling to *everything*,
including the flag and the suits. This became a real problem since the
astronauts carried loads of dust into the LEM. The dust also was crazily
abrasive and began to damage things quickly.


Jochem

--
"A designer knows he has arrived at perfection not when there is no
longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away."
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery

On May 22, 8:16*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Wretch Fossil wrote:
Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
the flag to adhere any dirt to the flag.

Static charge from solar wind. *We're done here.

Where's Brad Guth when we need him?


Mark L. Fergerson

On 5月22日, 下�11時16分, Fred J. McCall wrote:
wrote:
Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
the flag to adhere any dirt to the flag.

Static charge from solar wind. Â*We're done here.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
Â*territory."
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* --G. Behn

Impossible. Also, this American flag decal shows no "dirt" from
"static charge from solar wind":
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...34-20469HR.jpg

On Thu, 24 May 2012 07:38:43 -0700, Fred J. McCall
wrote:

" wrote:

On May 22, 8:16*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Wretch Fossil wrote:
Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
the flag to adhere any dirt to the flag.

Static charge from solar wind. *We're done here.

Where's Brad Guth when we need him?


More to the point, under what hypothetical situation could we possible
NEED The Guthball?

"They won't let us use monkeys in the experiments any more."


--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank]

On 5月22日, 下�11時16分, Fred J. McCall wrote:
wrote:
Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
the flag to adhere any dirt to the flag.

Static charge from solar wind. Â*We're done here.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
Â*territory."
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* --G. Behn

Static charge from solar wind resulted in "a layer of suspended dust
about
one meter above the lunar surface." (Ref. 1). However, the anomalies
on the American flags were about two meters high (Ref. 2). Anyway, the
American flag decal (about one meter from the ground, Ref. 3) on Lunar
Module showed no signs of soil/dirt/dust/particles in this image:
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...34-20469HR.jpg

Ref. 1: fifth line in abstract of this NASA article:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/ca...010034552..pdf

Ref. 2:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...044315525&p=78

Ref. 3:
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...13-18340HR.jpg

In article ,
says...

Wretch Fossil wrote:

On 5?22?, ??11?16?, Fred J. McCall wrote:
wrote:
Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
the flag to adhere any dirt to the flag.

Static charge from solar wind. *We're done here.


Impossible.


I see. Basic physics is 'impossible' in your world, while massive
conspiracies can be kept secret for decades.

I think we now have a good picture of your world....

I think we're close to a clinical diagnosis as well. Wretch Fossil just
needs a professional opinion to confirm it.

Jeff
--
" Ares 1 is a prime example of the fact that NASA just can't get it
up anymore... and when they can, it doesn't stay up long. "
- tinker

On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:58:22 AM UTC-4, Wretch Fossil wrote:
Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
the flag to adhere any“dirt” to the flag.

Ref. 1:
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627377 http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627515

Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Examina...nce_of_ stars
Quote from Ref. 2:“In the Apollo 11 press conference, Neil Armstrong
states that he was "never able to see stars from the lunar surface or
on the daylight side of the moon by eye" [6] Stars were visible with
the naked eye only when they were in the shadow of the Moon. All of
the landings were in daylight.[7]”

Ref. 3:
http://www.space.com/14725-moon-temp...ays-night.html
Quote from Ref. 3: “Temperatures on the moon are very hot in the
daytime, about 100 degrees Centigrade. A single "day" on the moon
lasts about 28 Earth days, meaning the lunar daytime is nearly two
Earth weeks long.”

Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

I did my thesis on particle charging and lunar dust in direct sunlight in vaccuum is ideal for charging and being attracted to a wonderful dielectric surface like a synthetic flag. If there was NOT dust on the flag, I'd be suspicious. This environment is so well suited for particle charging that such charging is proposed to be used for transport of large volumes of dust for industrial purposes. You'd expect the dust to best cling to dielectric surfaces like space suits and flags. It would cling less to conductors which would bleed away the charge.

On 5月22日, 下�11時16分, Fred J. McCall wrote:
wrote:
Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
the flag to adhere any dirt to the flag.

Static charge from solar wind. Â*We're done here.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
Â*territory."
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* --G. Behn

Added on May 27:
No dirt could have these shapes of magnified neuron remains.

Shapes of magnified neuron remains on American flags on the Moon:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...044309463&p=76
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...044282671&p=67