A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Patent portions updates

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 26th 20, 12:02 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Jeff Findley[_6_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 2,083
Default Patent portions updates

In article , says...

don't talk to Sylvia she is just a troll

Baseless assertion.

All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone.
These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends,
employer, or any organization that I am a member of.
Old March 26th 20, 04:23 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Dean Markley
external usenet poster
Posts: 455
Default Patent portions updates

On Monday, March 23, 2020 at 6:41:38 PM UTC-4, wrote:
Il giorno lunedì 23 marzo 2020 23:01:40 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 23-Mar-20 10:30 pm, wrote:
Il giorno lunedì 23 marzo 2020 09:56:39 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 23-Mar-20 5:14 pm,
Il giorno lunedì 23 marzo 2020 03:31:07 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 23-Mar-20 3:21 am,

We are preparing an advanced PNN F432 prototype patent which demonstrates not only the possibility of violating the principle of action and reaction but also the principle of inertia and the second law of dynamics.
Only by exceeding Newton's laws will interstellar flight and reach worlds equal to Earth be possible.
Our goal is to sell PNN prototypes and we will do it whether they help us or not

Please notify when you file the application so that I can file an
objection based on the fact that it is has not been demonstrated to
work, and violates the accepted laws of physics.


Whoever gave me this 20 years www.asps.it/pat98.jpg ago established that this description www.asps.it/setupdip.htm (use the translator) did not violate any laws of physics.

You yourself said that it did in your OP.


I see that it does not put any links to not be denied. I repeat that as mentioned in www.asps.it/setupdip.htm the thrust was too low to be used. She does not want to do or can not do the math.

Do you dispute that you said that it violates laws of physics in your
original posting?

Translate this is not mine http://www.sagredo.eu/varie/terzopr-em.pdf

Action reaction principle can be circumvented in electrodynamics.
You speak like a philosopher


You're not going to raise any money here. Particularly not when you can't engage in rational discussion.

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lunar water brings portions of Moon's origin story into question Yousuf Khan[_2_] Astronomy Misc 50 June 8th 11 07:55 PM
Portions of Ilan Ramon's Flight Diary recovered Tiro Verus History 1 March 7th 05 03:53 PM
ASTRO: From the summer: Network Nebula in Ha, [OIII] and [SII] and other portions of The Veil Richard Crisp Astronomy Misc 8 January 10th 04 09:46 PM
ASTRO: From the summer: Network Nebula in Ha, [OIII] and [SII] and other portions of The Veil Richard Crisp CCD Imaging 8 January 10th 04 09:46 PM
Woo hoo! New patent ... Scott Lowther Policy 4 July 3rd 03 06:09 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2020 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.