|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and
Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as
Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book 100 Years Of E=mc2. https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 An open letter to Dr Alexander Inpain as he introduced on Wrap Forum. What you got in Cheating and Misusing Name of CERN ? www.cern.ch Part I In previous many posts on Special Relativity Forum you introduced yourself as Dr Alexander Inpain who working at CERN and running Nuclear Reactors. Also your reply showed that you are an administrators and post my replies on the Notice Boards of the CERN. So I gave lot of weightage to yours comments, which were absolutely unscientific. So , I could not assess how a person with SUCH POOR KNOWLEDGE can be at CERN? It became clear when I inquired from CERN regarding it. So you CHEATED scientific community on the WHOLE. It is matter of shame. ON 28 Sep I got letter from Head Physics Dept., Dr Jean-Jacques Blaising ( pasted below). Subject: Is Dr Inpain at CERN Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:27:30 +0200 From: "Jean-Jacques Blaising" Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert To: "ajay sharma" CC: "Jean-Jacques Blaising" Dear Mrs Sharma, Mr Inpain is not a member of the the CERN personnel and is not registered at CERN as a scientific associate. Regards, Jean-Jacques Blaising That you are not associated with CERN with any capacity. So you are a liar WHO WILL BELIEVE YOU. You have cheated the scientific community. Part II You don’t deserve the reply , but let me add. However I am posting this reply on various Internet Groups for information. You have posted some links Un moderated Internet Groups has NO scientific validity. Even a child knows this; it is merely a forums for interactions. My work is published in international journals after PEER REVIEW. I will welcome ANYONE to contradict it in the PHYSICS ESSAYS (as it originally published in it) www.physicsessays.com See how links given by you are scientifically MEANINGLESS.. http://groups.google.com/group/epist...7b3f49b8974b7a It has nothing to do with my work. http://gase1234.tripod.com/ASharma.pdf This link is without Name and Place. 100s times I asked ( see numerous posts , sci.physics.relativity) on google group that put your name and address in it. But it was not put. How can you believe a person who cannot put his name and address on the post? Apparently he is also like your elder brother. So EVERYTHING IS CLEAR. Only persons like you can give importance to this Even then if you put angle phi 89 then it SUPPORS my work . The end result is the same. It is incomplete in the sense that final numerical values are not calculated. Further http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdis...or=macactupapi This link shows the lack of UNDERSTADING of 11th Class Physics i.e. application of Conservation of Momentum. What I can do? I can advise to read 11th class book. Earlier it was big NOTE by some UNKNOWN but now cut to Half. However this author has promised me long back that author will contradict me in PHYSICS ESSAYS. But the promise is not kept. Part III MY WORK IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, FLAWLESS. Author/Editors/Publishers/Referees is all correct Still there ANYONE is welcome to contradict the work in Physics Essays giving the facts e.g. What is Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper ? What are conditions under which it is derived? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharma’s Interpretation? How Ajay Sharma’s apper is different from Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper How Ajay Sharma’s interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations? I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS. If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your interpretation and published the paper it is OK. There are thousands of link to my work on the internet. All the references are given below for the purpose. Part IV References. References of Einstein’s work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharma’s work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Ajay Sharma Email 1st October 2006 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper an
AJAY SHARMA wrote: Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book 100 Years Of E=mc2. https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 An open letter to Dr Alexander Inpain as he introduced on Wrap Forum. What you got in Cheating and Misusing Name of CERN ? www.cern.ch Part I In previous many posts on Special Relativity Forum you introduced yourself as Dr Alexander Inpain who working at CERN and running Nuclear Reactors. Also your reply showed that you are an administrators and post my replies on the Notice Boards of the CERN. So I gave lot of weightage to yours comments, which were absolutely unscientific. So , I could not assess how a person with SUCH POOR KNOWLEDGE can be at CERN? It became clear when I inquired from CERN regarding it. So you CHEATED scientific community on the WHOLE. It is matter of shame. ON 28 Sep I got letter from Head Physics Dept., Dr Jean-Jacques Blaising ( pasted below). Subject: Is Dr Inpain at CERN Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:27:30 +0200 From: "Jean-Jacques Blaising" Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert To: "ajay sharma" CC: "Jean-Jacques Blaising" Dear Mrs Sharma, Mr Inpain is not a member of the the CERN personnel and is not registered at CERN as a scientific associate. Regards, Jean-Jacques Blaising That you are not associated with CERN with any capacity. So you are a liar WHO WILL BELIEVE YOU. You have cheated the scientific community. Part II You don’t deserve the reply , but let me add. However I am posting this reply on various Internet Groups for information. You have posted some links Un moderated Internet Groups has NO scientific validity. Even a child knows this; it is merely a forums for interactions. My work is published in international journals after PEER REVIEW. I will welcome ANYONE to contradict it in the PHYSICS ESSAYS (as it originally published in it) www.physicsessays.com See how links given by you are scientifically MEANINGLESS.. http://groups.google.com/group/epist...7b3f49b8974b7a It has nothing to do with my work. http://gase1234.tripod.com/ASharma.pdf This link is without Name and Place. 100s times I asked ( see numerous posts , sci.physics.relativity) on google group that put your name and address in it. But it was not put. How can you believe a person who cannot put his name and address on the post? Apparently he is also like your elder brother. So EVERYTHING IS CLEAR. Only persons like you can give importance to this Even then if you put angle phi 89 then it SUPPORS my work . The end result is the same. It is incomplete in the sense that final numerical values are not calculated. Further http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdis...or=macactupapi This link shows the lack of UNDERSTADING of 11th Class Physics i.e. application of Conservation of Momentum. What I can do? I can advise to read 11th class book. Earlier it was big NOTE by some UNKNOWN but now cut to Half. However this author has promised me long back that author will contradict me in PHYSICS ESSAYS. But the promise is not kept. Part III MY WORK IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, FLAWLESS. Author/Editors/Publishers/Referees is all correct Still there ANYONE is welcome to contradict the work in Physics Essays giving the facts e.g. What is Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper ? What are conditions under which it is derived? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharma’s Interpretation? How Ajay Sharma’s apper is different from Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper How Ajay Sharma’s interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations? I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS. If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your interpretation and published the paper it is OK. There are thousands of link to my work on the internet. All the references are given below for the purpose. Part IV References. References of Einstein’s work . A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. . DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharma’s work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Ajay Sharma Email 1st October 2006 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper an
AJAY SHARMA wrote: AJAY SHARMA wrote: Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book 100 Years Of E=mc2. https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 An open letter to Dr Alexander Inpain as he introduced on Wrap Forum. What you got in Cheating and Misusing Name of CERN ? www.cern.ch Part I In previous many posts on Special Relativity Forum you introduced yourself as Dr Alexander Inpain who working at CERN and running Nuclear Reactors. Also your reply showed that you are an administrators and post my replies on the Notice Boards of the CERN. So I gave lot of weightage to yours comments, which were absolutely unscientific. So , I could not assess how a person with SUCH POOR KNOWLEDGE can be at CERN? It became clear when I inquired from CERN regarding it. So you CHEATED scientific community on the WHOLE. It is matter of shame. ON 28 Sep I got letter from Head Physics Dept., Dr Jean-Jacques Blaising ( pasted below). Subject: Is Dr Inpain at CERN Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:27:30 +0200 From: "Jean-Jacques Blaising" Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert To: "ajay sharma" CC: "Jean-Jacques Blaising" Dear Mrs Sharma, Mr Inpain is not a member of the the CERN personnel and is not registered at CERN as a scientific associate. Regards, Jean-Jacques Blaising That you are not associated with CERN with any capacity. So you are a liar WHO WILL BELIEVE YOU. You have cheated the scientific community. Part II You don’t deserve the reply , but let me add. However I am posting this reply on various Internet Groups for information. You have posted some links Un moderated Internet Groups has NO scientific validity. Even a child knows this; it is merely a forums for interactions. My work is published in international journals after PEER REVIEW. I will welcome ANYONE to contradict it in the PHYSICS ESSAYS (as it originally published in it) www.physicsessays.com See how links given by you are scientifically MEANINGLESS.. http://groups.google.com/group/epist...7b3f49b8974b7a It has nothing to do with my work. http://gase1234.tripod.com/ASharma.pdf This link is without Name and Place. 100s times I asked ( see numerous posts , sci.physics.relativity) on google group that put your name and address in it. But it was not put. How can you believe a person who cannot put his name and address on the post? Apparently he is also like your elder brother. So EVERYTHING IS CLEAR. Only persons like you can give importance to this Even then if you put angle phi 89 then it SUPPORS my work . The end result is the same. It is incomplete in the sense that final numerical values are not calculated. Further http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdis...or=macactupapi This link shows the lack of UNDERSTADING of 11th Class Physics i.e. application of Conservation of Momentum. What I can do? I can advise to read 11th class book. Earlier it was big NOTE by some UNKNOWN but now cut to Half. However this author has promised me long back that author will contradict me in PHYSICS ESSAYS. But the promise is not kept. Part III MY WORK IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, FLAWLESS. Author/Editors/Publishers/Referees is all correct Still there ANYONE is welcome to contradict the work in Physics Essays giving the facts e.g. What is Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper ? What are conditions under which it is derived? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharma’s Interpretation? How Ajay Sharma’s apper is different from Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper How Ajay Sharma’s interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations? I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS. If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your interpretation and published the paper it is OK. There are thousands of link to my work on the internet. All the references are given below for the purpose. Part IV References. References of Einstein’s work . A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. . DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharma’s work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Ajay Sharma Email 1st October ---------- 2006 ----------------------- Can Dr Alexander Inpain will respond? . Ever since the letter dated 28 Sep 2206 from Head TP , CERN, Dr "Jean-Jacques Blaising" was put on the web , Dr Inpain stopped responding on the net. Dr Jean-Jacques Blaising has pointed out he is not AT ALL associated with CERN. The world of science simply wants to know what necessity of DEEFAMING CERN and this scientific ABUSE. It is due to actions of such persons , the whole Internet community is being taken lightly. Otherwise , Internet is boon for exchange of ideas. Can Dr Alexander Inpain will respond ? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|