|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The continuing decline of science writing
From a CNN online article about Google Moon Prize:
by A. Pawlowski ".....a company that launches cremated human remains into Earth's orbit, recently..." An Earth orbit is not posessive....It should have read simply "Earth orbit". I have seen this mistake made by others, also. Shame on the journalists.....or is it "journalist's"? Our schools are failing to teach proper English and writing. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The continuing decline of science writing
M wrote:
From a CNN online article about Google Moon Prize: by A. Pawlowski ".....a company that launches cremated human remains into Earth's orbit, recently..." An Earth orbit is not posessive....It should have read simply "Earth orbit". I have seen this mistake made by others, also. Shame on the journalists.....or is it "journalist's"? Our schools are failing to teach proper English and writing. This easily qualifies as the dumbest usenet post of all time. Oops, I forgot to capitalize usenet. Sorry. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The continuing decline of science writing
M wrote:
".....a company that launches cremated human remains into Earth's orbit, recently..." An Earth orbit is not posessive....It should have read simply "Earth orbit". Shame on the journalists.....or is it "journalist's"? Our schools are failing to teach proper English and writing. The post would be better titled "The continuing proliferation of ill-informed but self-assured 'Language is going to hell' laments"... or possibly "The continuing sci.space.* tradition of condescension to non-space-obsessives." There's no authority, nor any conclusive weight of usage, for your "An Earth orbit is not possessive." I can infer your case for reserving that for any orbit around the Earth, and "Earth's orbit" for our planet's path around the sun. But there's very little chance it will gain widespread acceptance, and no reason at all to take the schools to task for failing to inculcate it. Of course, that's only my opinion as a career writer for 35 years, former HS English teacher and college professor of writing. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The continuing decline of science writing
Monte Davis wrote: There's no authority, nor any conclusive weight of usage, for your "An Earth orbit is not possessive." All your orbits are belong to us. Kang The Klingon Empire |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The continuing decline of science writing
On Jul 2, 10:52*am, Pat Flannery wrote:
Monte Davis wrote: There's no authority, nor any conclusive weight of usage, for your "An Earth orbit is not possessive." All your orbits are belong to us. Kang The Klingon Empire The Enterprise just got back from orbiting Uranus searching for Klingons, they must have missed you! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Decline of AT CNC - December 2007 onwards | ukastronomy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 7th 08 09:26 AM |
Decline of AT CNC - December 2007 onwards | ukastronomy | UK Astronomy | 0 | February 7th 08 09:25 AM |
Decline of AT CNC - December 2007 onwards | ukastronomy | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | February 7th 08 09:25 AM |
it should consequently decline despite quaint handsome hills | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 14th 07 12:24 PM |
altering science writing to fit Internet and not journals; Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 11 | August 11th 05 06:57 AM |