|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Replacing Past Shuttle Missions with Rockets and Things
I finished reading This New Ocean about a month ago. Two of its main themes are how the space industry and the military are interlocked and wound tightly together. The other theme is the group of people who supported the "manned" missions to space and the moon vs. the scientists who thought sending men to space was a waste of money and resources; scientist who thought research could be done better and cheaper with pilotless rockets and satellites. This has me wondering about the space shuttle. In the part about the Challenger explosion the author mentions how sad it was and how big a blow it was to space flight and all that, and of course the speech Reagan gave that night. But the author also says no one said anything about the payload in the shuttle (a spy satellite I think) and that it could actually have been deployed on a rocket. So basically, the deaths of the astronauts were a waste. So my question: how many of the missions the shuttle went on could actually have been done with pilotless rockets? Besides the "human" experiments in space could the shuttle have been replaced with rockets for most of it's missions? What about the all important military spy satellites and such? Could all of that have been done by rockets? How about a percentage of total shuttle missions that could have been replaced with unmanned missions? 50% More or less? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Replacing Past Shuttle Missions with Rockets and Things
"Steen" wrote in
. dk: Von Fourche wrote: speech Reagan gave that night. But the author also says no one said anything about the payload in the shuttle (a spy satellite I think) Challenger carried a TDRS-satellite http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TDRS and that it could actually have been deployed on a rocket. So Of course. That goes for all satellites, the Shuttle has brought up. Except for the ones they brought back (or intended to bring back, like Spartan-Halley, which was also on Challenger). There is currently no other spacecraft capable of retrieving spacecraft like the shuttle can. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Replacing Past Shuttle Missions with Rockets and Things
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:10:54 -0600, "Jorge R. Frank"
wrote: There is currently no other spacecraft capable of retrieving spacecraft like the shuttle can. ....And I've gotten the impression that with CEV there *won't* be that sort of capability. I could see, perhaps, a cargo return version, but there's the issue of soft landing vs the semi-hard one we're going to see when CEV becomes operational. The Shuttle provides this. OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shuttle musings/rant. | N9WOS | Space Shuttle | 2 | August 12th 05 01:01 PM |
Things fall off of rockets all the time. | Unclaimed Mysteries | Policy | 3 | July 30th 05 05:50 AM |
NASA Instituting Crowd Control on Shuttle | Bill | Space Shuttle | 6 | March 26th 05 12:15 AM |
Reviewing the past 12 monyhs, KSC enters 2004 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 24th 03 03:32 PM |
Shuttle dumped within 5 years | Ultimate Buu | Policy | 220 | October 5th 03 03:50 AM |